Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LurkedLongEnough
The Vince Foster cover-up is now sealed and completed. FWIW, I don't think the Clintons had him killed - but it's hard to understand how a man can drive to the park without car keys, walk down a dirt trail without getting the soles of his shoes dirty, and shoot himself without getting blowback on his hand. But who am I to second-guess our omniscient government?
2 posted on 03/30/2004 7:29:31 AM PST by dirtboy (Howard, we hardly knew ye. Not that we're complaining, mind you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
Wrong decision here. I believe in a right to privacy, but it doesn't apply here at all, not to 'family members'.

4 posted on 03/30/2004 7:38:54 AM PST by HarryCaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy
- but it's hard to understand how a man can drive to the park without car keys, walk down a dirt trail without getting the soles of his shoes dirty, and shoot himself without getting blowback on his hand.

You left out being dead before his car arrived, and firing the gun without getting fingerprints on it.

8 posted on 03/30/2004 7:49:38 AM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy; longshadow
The Vince Foster cover-up is now sealed and completed. FWIW, I don't think the Clintons had him killed - but it's hard to understand how a man can drive to the park without car keys, walk down a dirt trail without getting the soles of his shoes dirty, and shoot himself without getting blowback on his hand. But who am I to second-guess our omniscient government?

It sounds like you two have a pretty good case even without the photos. I'm guessing that other official investigative information is available even though the photos aren't, right?

28 posted on 03/30/2004 8:48:58 AM PST by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy
I don't think the Clintons had him killed

Naive.

It was either the Clintons or someone they are beholden to in the Arkansas Mafia. No one other than the President had the power to cover up his murder, and he would have to have had a motive to do so.

ML/NJ

64 posted on 03/30/2004 3:30:27 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy
I believe the Clintons may have had a hand in it because there are too many people associated with them that have expired one way or another. Why not Mr. Foster?
72 posted on 03/30/2004 6:37:02 PM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy
Hmm, and how come we never had forensics evidence published about carpet fibers on his trousers and that cozy apt. he and Hill shared in D.C.? Did the Secret Service clean up that apt of signs of a murder or suicide? I'd like to know what my tax dollars paid for.
87 posted on 03/31/2004 4:11:39 PM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy
Ya!

And Kennedy was shot by a lone gunman. How do I know? Because the government told me it was the truth.
89 posted on 03/31/2004 8:52:27 PM PST by ASTM366
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson