Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
Wrong decision here. I believe in a right to privacy, but it doesn't apply here at all, not to 'family members'.

4 posted on 03/30/2004 7:38:54 AM PST by HarryCaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: HarryCaul
The "right not to be offended" and its continuing implications...
5 posted on 03/30/2004 7:43:26 AM PST by thoughtomator (Voting Bush because there is no reasonable alternative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: HarryCaul; OXENinFLA
'family members'.

That's the new meme, it expands 'victim status' to an exponential number of people.

7 posted on 03/30/2004 7:45:02 AM PST by StriperSniper (Ernest Strada Fanclub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: HarryCaul
I agree with you - after 11 years, if the family hasn't moved on - they're in serious trouble.

But .. the family may have made the stink about the photos because they were told they had to - if they didn't want to join Foster. We'll probably not know the truth about this for many more years.
76 posted on 03/30/2004 8:28:20 PM PST by CyberAnt (The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson