Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Truth about Bush and WMD
The Intellectual Conservative ^ | 28 March 2004 | Christopher Tremoglie

Posted on 03/29/2004 10:17:45 AM PST by Lando Lincoln

Former President Clinton said in 1998 that Iraq had WMDs and that the U.S. would need to use force if Saddam Hussein rejected peace. Yet Ramsey Clark is leading a movement to impeach President Bush for lying about Saddam's possession of WMDs?

The assertion that the President Bush manipulated WMD intelligence data and grossly exaggerated the state of Iraq's weapons program is a grave one. It is worthy of impeachment. Former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark is leading a movement to impeach the President. Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) has accused the President of lying and manipulating the data and reiterates Clark's thoughts. Senator John Kerry (D-MA) says the president needs to be honest with the people.

Honest! Remember that word.

The revelation by Chief Weapons Inspector David Kay that U.S. intelligence was "almost all wrong" about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) leave Americans unsure of their President's credibility. The statements by the president's administration deceived the American people. They inferred that Iraq was undoubtedly in possession of WMD and would use them.

Lies! Our country and its people are sick of the lies involving war!

The President said "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them." And now there are no weapons? He is on record as saying, "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." The statements from the administration and fellow party members concurred with the president's statements leading the American people to believe that Iraq possessed WMD. "We have known for years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." said the Congresswoman from California. Furthermore, in backing the president's intention on military action on Iraq, several Senators stated, ""We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and to take necessary actions...to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."

Honesty! Remember that word.

What about the people? There were massive amounts of people protesting this war. Millions gathered worldwide. Obviously, public sentiment was against this war, and now it appears the facts were too.

Honesty! Remember that word.

Confronting the President who made those comments and impeaching that President is unfeasible. President Clinton made them in 1998. Also, the next time Senator John Kerry is giving a speech (and before his one millionth declaration of his Vietnam service) about how he would make a better president then George Bush, would someone please suggest to him a cure for amnesia? He was among the Senators quoted above urging military action in October 1998. The Congresswoman who was quoted about Iraq WMD was Nancy Pelosi in December 1998, now the Democrat Majority Leader.

So in 1998 under Clinton there was evidence of Weapons of Mass Destruction but now under President Bush, there isn't any?

Honest? Lying to the public? Isn't that the Democrats' claim?

This is the truth that the Democrats do not want you to hear. The truth is that President Bush never lied or manipulated anyone. In going to war, President Bush used the intelligence available to him - the same intelligence that Clinton, Kerry and the other "Democratogogues" supported during the Clinton regime - and made a decision in which he thought was the best available method to secure the nation and eliminate the possibility of future terrorist threats. As Senator Joseph Lieberman said "The case was there back as far as '98, as far as I was concerned, to get rid of Saddam--all the stronger after September 11th, because we would naturally say to ourselves, 'We don't want to look back after Saddam sponsors some horrific action against us and say why didn't we stop him when we had the chance?"

Proud to be an American, aren't you? If you can stomach it, here is more truth.

The rallies held worldwide saying "Bush is a horror!" and "Bush is a war criminal!" and things of that nature; the rallies held by peace-seeking citizens that were formed, supported and orchestrated by International A.N.S.W.E.R (Act Now Stop War End Racism) among others. While seemingly a nice acronym, A.N.S.W.E.R. is endorsed and funded by fanatical Communist and Muslim groups that have a main objective for the demise of the United States. Ramsey Clark is a card-carrying member of this group. That's right, the same Ramsey Clark who is leading an impeachment movement.

Honesty, right?

If the criteria for impeaching a President are lying and manipulating the public, what justice do his accusers, especially the Democrats, deserve after denying facts they stated six years ago? This is absolutely ridiculous and has to stop. The fact that the "democratogogues" are getting away with this must be pointed out to the American people. If not, the Democrats will imply and insinuate that Bush lied, thinking they can influence the presidential election and regain control of the White House, which is all they are truly concerned about doing. The American people have a right to know what is going on, especially when we are sending our troops overseas. To use the pain and sorrow of our country's citizens; to manipulate the public to achieve power is the lowest of lows. If this continues, the question will not be whether Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, but rather, who is the more imminent threat: terrorists or Democrats?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: allliars; bush; kerry; prewarintelligence; prewaritelligence; ramseyclark; wmd
Lando
1 posted on 03/29/2004 10:17:46 AM PST by Lando Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
bump
2 posted on 03/29/2004 10:18:43 AM PST by EggsAckley (....."I see the idiot is here"............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
The Clinton admin also put forth that al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein were in cahoots.

Someone should ask Clarky-boy about that.

3 posted on 03/29/2004 10:19:22 AM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Honesty is the best policy, but not the policy of Democrats.
4 posted on 03/29/2004 10:24:12 AM PST by AngieGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AngieGOP
Impeach the disinterred Roosevelt for his "lies" about Germany's atomic weapons program, which led to another Democrat's attacking Japan with our resulting nukes instead.
5 posted on 03/29/2004 10:59:57 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Looks like a very good script for the Bush add.
6 posted on 03/29/2004 11:19:15 AM PST by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Was 9-11 Revenge for the Starr Report?
What is the True "Living History" of 9-11?

LIVING HISTORY - 9 1 1

1) September 11,1998

House of Representatives releases some 445 pages of the Starr report. Millions of people read the report on the internet.

and then....

2) September 11 1999

reports:
CONVICTED TERRORISTS
set FREE By BILL CLINTON
http://www.freep.com/news/nw/qfree11.htm

(many felt that the release of the Puerto Rico Terrorists was a bid to win support for Hillary in New York from the Puerto Rico community)

3) September 11, 2000

Hillary was to be honored in New York..protests are planned.
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a39afbfb003fe.htm

NEW YORK (August 30) - In a move that critics say smacks of partisan politics, the World Jewish Congress will honor Hillary Clinton next month at a black-tie fund-raising dinner here. The event is scheduled for September 11, less than two months before voters go to the polls to decide whether she or her Republican challenger, Rep. Rick Lazio, should represent New York in the US Senate.

**
While on the Senate Floor, warnings of danger prophecy the coming terror to come...

Date: September 2000

Mr. CRAIG.
Mr. President, I came to the floor to talk about a significant date in this Nation's fight against terrorism. This week marks the **Clinton-Gore administration's decision to jeopardize American lives by surrendering to one of the most violent terrorist groups ever to operate on this country's soil.**

One year ago this week, President Clinton opened the jailhouse doors for 11 members of a terrorist group known as the FALN, which is dedicated to the violent pursuit of Puerto Rican independence. The FALN has claimed responsibility for some 130 bombings at civilian, political, and military sites in the United States. In all, the group murdered six Americans and maimed, often permanently, 84 others, including law enforcement officers.

On one occasion, members attacked a Navy bus in Puerto Rico killing two sailors and wounding nine others. As a result, 16 members of this violent terrorist group were convicted of dozens of felonies against the United States, and as soon as these 16 were in prison, the bombings stopped. ..... "


4) September 11, 2001

Terrorists attack the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

Hillary Clinton's major media foe, Barbara Olson murdered when her plane hits the Pentagon...9-11.

The Capitol Building, and our entire US Representative Government, is only spared from this "coupe" when passengers on Flight 93 attack the terrorists and foil the attentions to take this all the way to Washington D.C.

7 posted on 03/29/2004 11:25:16 AM PST by Joy Angela ( Hitlery *is* The Bad Seed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
Just releasing the myriad of still classified Pearl Harbor documents would be enough ... But then Dubya, Rove, Hughes, Card, ..., et. al., have never really learned to deflect a dim-0-crat attacks very effectively.

Just wondering - in the tea leaves - Is George W. a one term President? And if so, what does that say about the inept GOP Congressional leadership?

The early "line" on the final "9-11" Commission report, almost as if pre-ordained in this election season - is that "9-11" was preventable by the Bush_43 administration. Surprise, suprise, surprise, ...

8 posted on 03/29/2004 11:42:26 AM PST by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
bmp
9 posted on 03/29/2004 11:44:51 AM PST by shield (The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
We didn't have to prove Saddam had WMD, he had to prove he didn't.
10 posted on 03/29/2004 11:46:32 AM PST by petercooper (Obviously, common sense is not prerequisite to voting rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
I shall be overjoyed when that SOB Ramsey Clark meets his maker!!
11 posted on 03/29/2004 11:48:22 AM PST by verity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: verity
Please forgive me. Today is communist manifesto day at FR. My quote for this thread.

" A lie told often enough becomes the truth."

- Lenin
12 posted on 03/29/2004 12:34:38 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz (In 2004 Vote for Democracy. Vote Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson