Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Probe Spots 9 Terror Suspects in Merchant Marine
Netscape news & CNN ^ | 4 March 2004 | Caroline Drees

Posted on 03/05/2004 1:48:20 AM PST by An.American.Expatriate

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A 14-month investigation by the U.S. Coast Guard and FBI has uncovered nine merchant mariners with possible terrorist links, raising renewed concerns that U.S. ships and ports are vulnerable to attack.

Coast Guard spokeswoman Jolie Shifflet said on Thursday that "Operation Drydock," prompted by national security concerns after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, had also led to the arrest of about a dozen others whose active arrest warrants for crimes from minor misdemeanors to attempted murder had long gone unnoticed.

The Coast Guard said it investigated the records of more than 200,000 people who hold U.S. merchant mariner credentials.

It also revoked or suspended the licenses of roughly 200 other commercial seamen for a range of offenses, Shifflet said. None of those arrested, dismissed or suspended had been linked to terrorism.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.netscape.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: coastguard; enemywithin; fbi; jihadinamerica; merchantmarine; operationdrydock; terror; uscg
Heads Up!!
1 posted on 03/05/2004 1:48:20 AM PST by An.American.Expatriate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate
You have described the impossibility of trying to defeat the guerrilla in the field. If you protect the airlines, they will go after the ships. If you find the seamen, they will infiltrate the chemical workers or whatever.

Every guerrilla army (forget the term "terrorists." This is simply a guerrilla army with no limits on their targets.) must have the support of a host country or entity.

You cannot defeat the guerrilla in the field, but you can defeat him by making the price too high for the support country or entity. For example, we could not have won at Yorktown without the French fleet offshore to interdict the British fleet.

In this case, the support comes (came in the case of Iraq) from certain countries and a larger, trans-border group of Islamic fundamentalists.

No matter where they are found, they must be destroyed. Not impeded, not injured; they must be destroyed.

When that happens, the symptom of terrorism goes away.
2 posted on 03/05/2004 5:50:16 AM PST by MindBender26 (For more news, first, fast and factual.... Stay tuned to your local FReeper station !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
"No matter where they are found, they must be destroyed. Not impeded, not injured; they must be destroyed."

===

Exactly.

Thank God, that Bush and Rumsfeld recognized this early on and is proceeding accordingly.

"This is not a criminal action," the secretary of defense told Bush over a secure line. "This is war."
Rumsfeld's instant declaration of war, previously unreported, took America from the Clinton administration's view that terrorism was a criminal matter to the Bush administration's view that terrorism was a global enemy to be destroyed.
"That was really a breakthrough strategically and intellectually," recalls Douglas Feith, undersecretary of defense for policy. "Viewing the 9/11 attacks as a war that required a war strategy was a very big thought, and a lot flowed from that."
Rumsfeld wanted a war that was fought with ruthless efficiency: special forces, high-tech firepower, a scorecard for killing or capturing terrorists. He had no desire to become the world's jailer.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1083532/posts


God help us, if Kerry gets elected and takes us back to the ineffective Clinton approach.
3 posted on 03/05/2004 7:56:42 AM PST by FairOpinion ("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our country." --- G. W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate; Servant of the Nine
So we really don't know squat about the nine?
4 posted on 03/06/2004 1:00:54 AM PST by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson