Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 07/15/2004 4:19:46 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

locked



Skip to comments.

Jesus Was Black, Not White, Group Says
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 2/24/04 | Melanie Hunter

Posted on 02/24/2004 10:06:43 PM PST by kattracks

(1st Add: Includes comments by Rev. Jesse Peterson, president of B.O.N.D.)

(CNSNews.com) - One day before it debuts in theaters, a black activist group is protesting the Mel Gibson-written, directed and produced "The Passion of the Christ" film, not because of the film's violent depiction of Jesus Christ's final hours. Instead, they say the film is historically inaccurate because Jesus is portrayed as a white man, not a black man.

"Strangely absent from the debate is one very basic inaccuracy which has been long promoted in order to bolster white supremacy and maintain a revisionist history that is beneficial to only people of European descent," said Malik Z. Shabazz, national chairman of the New Black Panther Party in a statement Tuesday.

"This purposely omitted fact is that Jesus was not a European white man. Jesus Christ was a black man - a dark skinned Hebrew Israelite from Northern Africa and even the only Biblical physical description confirms this (Rev. 13:20)," said Shabazz.

"Not only does this film wrongfully depict Christ as white but all the disciples and Israelites are people of European descent, which presents a historical and physical impossibility," he added.

The New Black Panther Party and other black activists plan to stage protests nationwide over the controversy. Not only does the group claim the movie is "false," but also "harmful and racist."

The Anti-Defamation League recently expressed to Gibson its concern that the film would drum up anti-Semetism. Shabazz said his group disagrees with the ADL's claims that the film is "anti-semetic" and challenged the ADL to "deny the historical accuracy of the Jews' attack on Christ."

But Shabazz says, the "true controversy" surrounding the film "lies in the maligned history of African people through the world and the continual inaccuracies presented in every Hollywood production to date of any Biblical story from the 10 Commandments to the Christmas Story."

"These false images presented are 'anti-black' and these false images and interpretations only seek to further the racist and white supremist idea that God and Jesus Christ 'The Messiah' or 'Savior' is European and white," he added.

"This is clearly one more example of how black people in this country are treated unfairly. Black/African history has and continues to be misrepresented, black people worldwide are subjected to the psychologically abusive images of white supremacy and have no collective voice to defend or promote a Black agenda," Shabazz concluded.

Movie 'not racist,' says black conservative

But Rev. Jesse Peterson, president of the black conservative group, B.O.N.D. (Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny) said claims that Jesus is black takes away from the overall message.

Peterson said he saw the movie last weekend and "there's nothing in this movie that is racist at all."

"It was inspiring spiritually," he said. "I think that it's gonna reconfirm the faith in many Christians and it's gonna encourage those who had doubt about Christ. There will be many, I believe, that will believe in him. I knew that this thing would come out that 'he wasn't black' and that 'it's racist.' It's not."

Peterson explained that "the Bible clearly states that Christ was in Israel and that he was a Jew." The movie, he said "clearly points that out as well."

Peterson said to "cry racism is a non-issue. This is an attempt for attention. It's shameful to make that kind of assertion about this movie."

When asked specifically whether Shabazz's physical description of Jesus and his birthplace of Northern Africa was accurate, Peterson said, "I've heard that over and over again, and at one point when I resented white Americans, I believed that too."

But, he said, "in all honesty there is no, I think, perfect description of what Christ looked like anyway, and I think that each race…the white race at one point said that he looked white [with] blue eyes and blond hair. That wasn't true. The blacks are trying to claim him…Hispanics, everybody are trying to claim him as their own."

Peterson said that's why the Scripture clearly states "'do not create a graven image of him, because it will divide and cause confusion.'

"The most important thing is that he was a spirit. It's the spirit of the man, not necessarily what he looked like. And that's the focus that this movie brings out," Peterson said, adding that he thinks blacks and white are likely to focus on Jesus' "spirit rather than the color."

He said the Bible does point out that Jesus was "born in that area, but still he was a Jew, and at that time, maybe they didn't have the straight hair, but it doesn't mean he was…a black, African man."

Peterson said in the movie, Jesus is a dark-skinned man, not white with blue eyes, but a dark-skinned man. "He's not black, but he's not white either," he said.

Race not an issue

Peterson took the New Black Panther Party to task for making Jesus' race an issue.

"It's a shame that you have racist organizations like the New Black Panther Party that will come out and allow the devil or darkness to use them, because that's what's happening," he said. "It's a distraction. It's a trick of the devil to come out and call this movie racist…that he was black, he had nappy hair. That's a distraction."

Peterson believes the group is taking away from the spiritual message of the movie, a message, he said that can possibly help people that are hurting spiritually.

"I think that when people go to this movie, they need to look beyond the color. And I think most will, whether they want to or not…look at the spirit and the suffering that Christ went through," Peterson said.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.




TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blackpanthers; christ; christians; jessepeterson; newblackpantherparty; racebaiting; racialdivision; racism; thepassion; waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-249 next last

1 posted on 02/24/2004 10:06:43 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks

JESUS was OLIVE SKINNED NOT WHITE OR BLACK >.

2 posted on 02/24/2004 10:08:52 PM PST by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I always thought Jesus was a Presbyterian
3 posted on 02/24/2004 10:09:17 PM PST by woofie ( If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I seriously doubt it. How many Jews have you ever seen that were black? Not too many. There's Sammy Davis Junior, Whoopi Goldberg, and Jews from Ethiopia.
4 posted on 02/24/2004 10:09:32 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: KQQL
If Jews are white, Jesus was white.
6 posted on 02/24/2004 10:10:33 PM PST by luvbach1 (In the know on the border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Even if he was black. Does it really matter? This article gives me a headache.
7 posted on 02/24/2004 10:11:02 PM PST by Crispy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: woofie
No, no. Jesus was only a Presbyterian in a Lyle Lovett and Robert Earl Keen song :)
8 posted on 02/24/2004 10:13:02 PM PST by txzman (Jer 23:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: woofie
I always thought Jesus was a Presbyterian

That reminds me of the Jewish comdian commenting about Goldwater getting the Republican nomination for President in 1964, "I always knew the first Jewish president would be an Episcopalian."

9 posted on 02/24/2004 10:13:05 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
LOL. Behtlehem is in Northern Africa?

I saw Khaddafi on TV and he did NOT look black.

10 posted on 02/24/2004 10:13:39 PM PST by GeronL (http://www.ArmorforCongress.com......................Send a Freeper to Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Yeah, just another one of those racist movies. I was just as PO'd when The Ten Commandments showed Moses as a white guy, when everyone knows he was black. Same nonsense in Ghandi. Same for the movie JFK. Everyone knows JFK was black! This list goes on and on. Those Hollywood scum are constantly putting out "historical" movies showing famous people who are supposedly white, or other races, when in reality all the famous people from history were black.
11 posted on 02/24/2004 10:14:12 PM PST by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Rev. Jesse Peterson is on our side. The side of common sense.
12 posted on 02/24/2004 10:14:14 PM PST by Indie (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Since no one was alive back then, I really don't care myself.
13 posted on 02/24/2004 10:15:32 PM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Judah,..........David............Jesus was Jewish. Is Bible reading really that rare now?
14 posted on 02/24/2004 10:15:45 PM PST by Gal.5:1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The New Black Panther Party and other black activists plan to stage protests nationwide over the controversy.

That being the case, I just have to see it!

Fanatical liberal groups protesting it can only mean that it is a very accurate and powerful movie!

15 posted on 02/24/2004 10:15:46 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I'm still trying to find Rev 13:20. From what Bible is this?

At least we know that Adam wasn't a white Southern man. Have you ever tried to take a rib from a white Southerner?
16 posted on 02/24/2004 10:15:59 PM PST by abishai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
Since blue-eyed, blonde and red-headed Jews are not that rare today, geneticists assume some gene-mixing through intermarriage between Jews and Northern Europeans in which Judaism was assumed by the gentile half of the union. In Jesus' time, without such mixng, it is a reasonable assumption that the Hebrews were darker than many Jews of today, but not black.
17 posted on 02/24/2004 10:16:15 PM PST by luvbach1 (In the know on the border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
The 13th chapter of Revelation has only 18 verses!
18 posted on 02/24/2004 10:17:21 PM PST by texpat72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Jews in the first century were black???
19 posted on 02/24/2004 10:17:35 PM PST by E=MC<sup>2</sup>
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indie; mhking
Well if Jesus was black, he'd be a black conservative. More reasons to hate Jesus now.
20 posted on 02/24/2004 10:17:50 PM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-249 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson