Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Repeats Support For School Vouchers
CNN ^ | 02/14/04

Posted on 02/14/2004 8:49:12 AM PST by Cathryn Crawford

Edited on 04/29/2004 2:03:54 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush, celebrating the nation's first federally funded school voucher program set up in the District of Columbia, said Friday he hopes it will turn into "change across the country" in education.

"At some point in time, in order to challenge mediocrity where we find mediocrity, parents have to be given other options," Bush said in a speech at Archbishop Carroll High School.


(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: education; vouchers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 02/14/2004 8:49:13 AM PST by Cathryn Crawford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
Reform public schools.
1.Disband the N.E.A
2.Pass a federal right to work statute for teachers,no union membership allowed.
3.Require teachers to actually get a degree in the subject they are teaching.
4.Criminalise the use of the word "feelings"

And by the way,people with Ed.Doctorates are not Phd's so stop calling yourselves "Dr."
2 posted on 02/14/2004 9:00:51 AM PST by Redcoat LI ("If you're going to shoot,shoot,don't talk" Tuco BenedictoPacifico Juan Maria Ramirez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer; Aquinasfan; Land of the Irish
School Choice for All Americans!
End Secular Humanist Tyranny !

3 posted on 02/14/2004 9:25:49 AM PST by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
The voucher initiative was defeated in California by division within the conservative and Christian circles.

The argument was that wherever State money goes so does State regulation. Because of this, lots of Christians voted against vouchers because they did not want their private Christian schools being forced to teach the moral equivalency of Homosexuality or other such nonsense.

I am torn over this.

The courts have ruled that if you accept "State" then you accept the strings that come with it, i.e. inane regulation. If you don't want to have the "Heather has Two Mommies" crap foisted on your kids then don't accept the money.

4 posted on 02/14/2004 9:42:58 AM PST by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan
CORRECTION: The courts have ruled that if you accept "State" MONEY then you accept the strings that come with it, i.e. inane regulation. If you don't want to have the "Heather has Two Mommies" crap foisted on your kids then don't accept the money. Yes, I know it isn't the "State's" money but the courts do and since they have the power of the state behind them and all we have is logic, we are screwed.
5 posted on 02/14/2004 9:45:38 AM PST by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan
The correct solution to the state-money/state-regs problem is clear legislation and the elimination of activist judges. In the mean time the simple workaround is to issue income tax credits for tuition. Then the schools are receiving fund directly from parents and not the gov. The only drawback is that the poorest children still can't take advantage of that - but isn't that the way the liberals usually force the system to be?
6 posted on 02/14/2004 9:51:52 AM PST by azcap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan
That would be the Libertarian paranoia.

Chapter 1 Title Four funding has proven them wrong on their paranoia.

7 posted on 02/14/2004 10:26:23 AM PST by loudmouths
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
How about this. All money paid for education, be it private or homeschool become tax exempt. Would this work?
8 posted on 02/14/2004 10:31:50 AM PST by netmilsmom (Don't put a question mark where God put a period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
We have school choice now. Everyone has the choice to send their children to private school. They just have to pay for it themselves. What's wrong with that?
9 posted on 02/14/2004 6:45:00 PM PST by CalKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Torie
A trickle to be sure but sometimes trickles have a way of busting open the dams.
10 posted on 02/14/2004 6:48:35 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CalKat
We have school choice now. Everyone has the choice to send their children to private school. They just have to pay for it themselves. What's wrong with that?

The problem with that is parents who send their children to private school already have paid in taxes the cost of sending their children to public school.

Another problem with that is the simple fact that competition breeds efficiency.

11 posted on 02/14/2004 6:51:47 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CalKat
And it is one of the last places of refuge from government.

12 posted on 02/14/2004 6:54:02 PM PST by Lijahsbubbe (The brighter you are, the more you have to learn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
People without children also pay in taxes the cost of sending other people's children to school. Do you think childless people shouldn't have to pay taxes for other people's children to go to school?
13 posted on 02/14/2004 6:56:24 PM PST by CalKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CalKat
Do you think childless people shouldn't have to pay taxes for other people's children to go to school?

Certainly not. Do you think the government has a right to confiscate more than half of my income?

14 posted on 02/14/2004 7:02:14 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
So people who have children in private school should get a tax credit so their children can go to private school, but people with no children should not get a similar credit, even though they're not using the public school system?

And no, I don't think the federal government should confiscate more than half your income. Do they?
15 posted on 02/14/2004 7:16:21 PM PST by CalKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
And constitutional authority for federal funding of education is found where?
16 posted on 02/14/2004 7:34:08 PM PST by inquest (The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loudmouths
So you've found one aspect of federal education funding that (for now) doesn't have strings attached. So that's one down and 999,999 to go. For starters, just look at the effects that Title IX has wrought.
17 posted on 02/14/2004 7:35:41 PM PST by inquest (The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
"At some point in time, in order to challenge mediocrity where we find mediocrity, parents have to be given other options," Bush said in a speech at Archbishop Carroll High School.

Preach it brother!

And as the gov't schools go, so goes abortion, and homosexual marriage, etc. Evil people with evil ideas are attracted to the captive audience in gov't schools like flies to shi-.

18 posted on 02/15/2004 7:39:57 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CalKat
Everyone has the choice to send their children to private school. They just have to pay for it themselves. What's wrong with that?

Parents who can't afford to homeschool or private school are forced to send their children, sometimes against their will, to schools where they are prevented from exercising their religion freely. If this doesn't constitute a violation of the "free exercise" clause of the First Amendment, I don't know what does.

A far more equitable system would be a voucher system, where all parents would be given an equal amount of money to be spent on tuition at the gov't or private school of their choice.

19 posted on 02/15/2004 7:45:02 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Check this out. Imagine going to a school where if you don't accept homosexuality, you might not get your diploma ("students will be required blah, blah, blan..."):

http://www.worldmag.com/world/issue/02-14-04/opening_5.asp

I'm sure they will hold acceptance of homosexuality over the heads of the kids who have second thoughts about whether they want to "embrance homosexuality." Threatening your academic status is one way to gain compliance. Of course, it could backfire and garner nothing but contempt for public school officials and homosexuals.

At least the word in out on Boulder schools and students and their parents can decide if students want to attend or find other educational venues.

I just think it's a disgusting way for the public schools to promote "tolerance."



20 posted on 02/15/2004 8:00:02 AM PST by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson