Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Chris Matthews Unable or Unwilling to understand a simple exchange between Bush and Russert?
MSNBC

Posted on 02/09/2004 3:28:15 PM PST by rocklobster11

I just saw Chris Matthews on Lester Holt, and Lester asked him whether the National Guard issue would continue. Chris said that it would because Bush didn't answer the question.

Lester mentioned Terry McAuliffe's statement about Bush being AWOL. Chris brought up the president's answer about people not bad-mouthing the National Guard, and said that Terry McAuliffe had not said anything bad about the National Guard. Well, Russert did not ask Bush to comment on Terry McAuliffe, he asked Bush to comment on the National Guard issue. I've seen many stories in the press about how the National Guard is not real service and that people enlisted in the National Guard as a way of avoiding going to Vietnam. Thus, I think Bush's statement was right on.

Then Lester asked Chris about Bush getting out of the Guard 8 months early in order to go to HBS. Chris responded that HBS started in September and the period in question was from May of the previous year to May of that year. Well, that may have been Chris's period in question, but Tim Russert specifically asked the president if he had gotten out of the Guard 8 months early in order to attend HBS, and the president said yes.

So it seems that we have people saying three things about Bush's service

  1. Bush got into the Guard as a political favor to his father. Note that there have been several stories that specifically countered this claim, and there have been no stories mentioning anybody who can back up the claim of political favor. It appears that the Texas Guard did have a waiting list when Bush enlisted, but there was no waiting list for pilots, because of the amount of full time training required and because of the physical and mental requirements to become a pilot.
  2. Bush was AWOL during the time he was supposed to have been reporting to the Guard in Alabama. Bush specifically answered that he did report and did serve in Alabama, and the other side has provided no proof to the contrary, other than a story from the Boston Globe in 2000, in which the source has since said that he was misquoted.
  3. Bush got out the Guard early due to somebody pulling political strings. The fact is that Bush went thru proper channels in getting released early. Bush had been trained as a pilot (of F-102's I think), and the Guard was in the process of switching to a new generation of Fighters. It would not have made sense to retrain Bush on those Fighters when he only had 8 months of service left.

Here's the text of the Russert interview, and I think the president answered the questions fully.

President Bush: Political season is here.  I was  I served in the National Guard.  I flew F 102 aircraft.  I got an honorable discharge.  I've heard this  I've heard this ever since I started running for office.  I  I put in my time, proudly so.

I would be careful to not denigrate the Guard. It's fine to go after me, which I expect the other side will do. I wouldn't denigrate service to the Guard, though, and the reason I wouldn't, is because there are a lot of really fine people who served in the National Guard and who are serving in the National Guard today in Iraq.

Russert: The Boston Globe and the Associated Press have gone through some of their records and said there’s no evidence that you reported to duty in Alabama during the summer and fall of 1972.

President Bush: Yeah, they re they're just wrong. There may be no evidence, but I did report; otherwise, I wouldn't have been honorably discharged. In other words, you don't just say "I did something" without there being verification. Military doesn't work that way. I got an honorable discharge, and I did show up in Alabama.

Russert: You did were allowed to leave eight months before your term expired. Was there a reason?

President Bush: Right. Well, I was going to Harvard Business School and worked it out with the military.

Russert: When allegations were made about John McCain or Wesley Clark on their military records, they opened up their entire files. Would you agree to do that?

President Bush: Yeah. Listen, these files I mean, people have been looking for these files for a long period of time, trust me, and starting in the 1994 campaign for governor. And I can assure you in the year 2000 people were looking for those files as well. Probably you were. And absolutely. I mean, I

Russert: But would you allow pay stubs, tax records, anything to show that you were serving during that period?

President Bush: Yeah. If we still have them, but I you know, the records are kept in Colorado, as I understand, and they scoured the records.

And I'm just telling you, I did my duty, and it's politics, you know, to kind of ascribe all kinds of motives to me. But I have been through it before. I'm used to it. What I don't like is when people say serving in the Guard is is may not be a true service.

Russert: Would you authorize the release of everything to settle this?

President Bush: Yes, absolutely.

We did so in 2000, by the way.


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: awol; bush; ignorantmedia; matthews; nationalguard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

1 posted on 02/09/2004 3:28:19 PM PST by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11; cyncooper
Is Chris Matthews unstable?

YES!
2 posted on 02/09/2004 3:30:34 PM PST by EllaMinnow (If you want to send a message, call Western Union.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
It's just another media-manufactured microgate conjured by the left, like 16-WordGate, Wilson/PlameGate, HalliburtonGate and StockpileGate.
3 posted on 02/09/2004 3:33:14 PM PST by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
I actually like Hardball. Chris's over the top, in your face, cut you off before you get a chance to say anything style is entertaining. He usually has good guests as well. I just think he should occasionally do a little research before spouting off.
4 posted on 02/09/2004 3:33:45 PM PST by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
I used to watch him every night, but I'm going through a stage where I can't bear to listen to him, so I'm watching Law & Order re-runs instead.

His Scooter Libby paranoia gets on my nerves.
5 posted on 02/09/2004 3:37:53 PM PST by EllaMinnow (If you want to send a message, call Western Union.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
I so much appreciate you posting this. I saw this.

For context you should know that Tim Russert started the ball rolling on this last night. As you know the interview was played in full yesterday morning, then Dateline played about 20 minutes of excerpts last night. Then Stone Phillips asked a very SERIOUS looking Russert, right out of the gate, if this AWOL story had been adequately addressed and Russert said NO. I was stunned and have posted on various threads about it. Then Russert appeared on Imus this morning and continued to push this story as having not been answered adequately by President Bush.

Finally, I see the Chris Matthews exchange with Lester Holt that you also observed. I wanted to cry, they are acting like President Bush is being deceitful.

Matthews, when he mentioned McAuliffe, said "Nobody is trashing the Guard". Has Chris seen the Kerry comments from yesterday where he happens to lump in the Guard with draft-dodgers? There have been many comments from many democrats disparaging President Bush's service.

And the icing on the cake with this Matthews/Holt exchange: Holt points out President Bush has addressed this issue over the years many times. Matthews says this time it's different because he's facing a genuine war hero.

6 posted on 02/09/2004 3:41:30 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
You shouldn't spend so much time on this. Kerry in his heart knows that he's not a genuine person; he knows he's a scheming blowhard and that people instinctively don't like him. So he's trying a pre-emptive strike on the character and national security issues.

However, when people fucus on the race, they will find President Bush the superior on both character and on national security, and will not like Kerry because he's not a regular, stable human being.
7 posted on 02/09/2004 3:42:05 PM PST by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
Thank you for alerting me to this thread.
8 posted on 02/09/2004 3:42:34 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
Mathews is a Socialist pig! End of story!
9 posted on 02/09/2004 3:44:57 PM PST by Doc Savage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66
I appreciate knowing just how far some in the media will go in assisting the dem candidate and trying to harm the republican.

We should all know who is coming from where.
10 posted on 02/09/2004 3:45:21 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
I you don't have the facts, argue the law. If you don't have the law, argue the facts. If you don't have either, lie.

And I don't suppose any of these "journalists" will question Kerry being discharged early to run for Congress.

11 posted on 02/09/2004 3:46:10 PM PST by colorado tanker ("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
Your life will become more peaceful when you cease watching the motor mouths.
12 posted on 02/09/2004 3:46:55 PM PST by verity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
How about seeing Drudge post this as his main story today? I've got to assume everyone in the press knows there is no story here but has nothing else to report today. Or perhaps I'm giving the press too much credit.
13 posted on 02/09/2004 3:49:30 PM PST by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
And I don't suppose any of these "journalists" will question Kerry being discharged early to run for Congress.

And there is the crux of my frustration. Since Matthews already christened Kerry a "genuine war hero" he clearly is interested in "digging" (harrassing and denigrating) one side, using an issue that seems convenient at the moment. He'll beat it while it's viable or is so thoroughly debunked he'll be forced to give it up.

14 posted on 02/09/2004 3:51:56 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66
Kerry in his heart knows that he's not a genuine person;

Deeper in his heart he knows he's not a hero. The truth regarding this will also come out.

15 posted on 02/09/2004 3:53:34 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
I rarely go to Drudge anymore. Are you saying he is running something on this, or are you saying he should?

Brit right now quoting Kerry before Congress in 1971 where he lies about our soldiers over in Vietnam.

16 posted on 02/09/2004 3:53:49 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
"For context you should know that Tim Russert started the ball rolling on this last night. As you know the interview was played in full yesterday morning, then Dateline played about 20 minutes of excerpts last night. Then Stone Phillips asked a very SERIOUS looking Russert, right out of the gate, if this AWOL story had been adequately addressed and Russert said NO."

Who needs more evidence that the presss is out to get the president - just as they went after his father in retaliation for what they considered a media blackout during the Gulf War?

17 posted on 02/09/2004 3:54:46 PM PST by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
The so called "Mainstream Media" is trying to elect any Democrat and they lie so much they wouldnt know the truth if it hit them in the face.
The bad part about this is so many Americans are so damned dumb they dont realize it.
The Democrats and the NEA know what they are doing when they keep dumbing our kids down. They are all in bed together and feed this country a steady diet of lies!
18 posted on 02/09/2004 3:55:18 PM PST by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
CHRIS IS NOW IN FULL CAMPAIGHN MODE(DEMOCRATIC, ELITE MEDIA)
19 posted on 02/09/2004 3:56:03 PM PST by Helms (Liberals believe we are Crash Dummies on the hectic highway of the Cosmos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helms
I thought CNBC was trying to be more balanced by putting on the Dennis Miller show. Then I realized that they made it the most boring show ever, so it is sure to fail. It should have been set up like a conservative version of Politically Incorrect.
20 posted on 02/09/2004 4:01:16 PM PST by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson