Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"I'll explain them all as we go along," Kerry swiftly replied to the heckler. "I never run away from anything, especially George Bush."

As soon as I figure out why I voted for them and can get some good lies and excuses for my votes down in my stump speech!

Then he pointed to a basketball net in the Boys' and Girls' Club gymnasium and read words stenciled on the backboard. "A winner never quits and a quitter never wins," he said, calling that an apt summary of his makeup.

Because I can never think of my own sayings just like the way I copied Bush's "Bring it On" and used it as my own. And just like the way I announced my running for president standing an aircraft carrier just because Bush gave a speech on one. Man I have no personality!

1 posted on 02/05/2004 12:35:06 PM PST by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: areafiftyone
He's a dork.
2 posted on 02/05/2004 12:36:49 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Kerry is going to get sliced and diced.
5 posted on 02/05/2004 12:38:21 PM PST by Dog (Have you forgotten -- - --- -- the day when those towers fell...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Actually he used a technicality to leave Vietnam. Three purple hearts with no missed duty. How many WW2 veterans came home on 3 scratches?
6 posted on 02/05/2004 12:38:45 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Please God, don't give us another Clinton "I this and me that" president!
7 posted on 02/05/2004 12:39:24 PM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
"I'll explain them all as we go along," Kerry swiftly replied to the heckler.

Fortunately for John f-in, the press will never remind him of these terrible missteps, and he'll never have to explain nuthin' to nobody.

Here's an "apt summary of his makeup": Botox, blush and a $150 haircut.

8 posted on 02/05/2004 12:41:37 PM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
The Massachusetts lawmaker had just received an endorsement from Maine Gov. John Baldacci when somebody from the crowd of about 400 shouted, "Why don't you tell them about your vote on the war and the Patriot Act?"

I guarantee this "heckler" was a Deaniac!

A Mainer = Extreme liberal AND one who hates anyone from Massachusetts!
9 posted on 02/05/2004 12:42:07 PM PST by Jackson Brown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
From the Cape Cod Times today:

Big Dig dollars flowed to Kerry donor
Senator's office says intervention on behalf of insurer was not related to subsequent campaign support.

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON - A Senate colleague was trying to close a loophole that allowed a major insurer to divert millions of federal dollars from the nation's most expensive construction project. John Kerry stepped in and blocked the legislation.

Over the next two years, the insurer, American International Group, paid Kerry's way on a trip to Vermont and donated at least $30,000 to a tax-exempt group Kerry used to set up his presidential campaign. Company executives donated $18,000 to his Senate and presidential campaigns.

Were the two connected? Kerry says not.

But to some government watchdogs, the tale of the Massachusetts senator's 2000 intervention, detailed in documents obtained by The Associated Press, is a textbook case of the special interest politicking that Kerry rails against on the presidential trail.

"The idea that Kerry has not helped or benefited from a specific special interest, which he has said, is utterly absurd," said Charles Lewis, head of the Center for Public Integrity that just published a book on political donations to the presidential candidates.

"Anyone who gets millions of dollars over time, and thousands of dollars from specific donors, knows there's a symbiotic relationship. He needs the donors' money. The donors need favors. Welcome to Washington. That is how it works."

The documents obtained by AP provide a window into Kerry's involvement in a two-decade-old highway and tunnel construction project in his home state of Massachusetts. Known as the Big Dig, it had become infamous for its multibillion dollar cost overruns.

Kerry's office confirmed yesterday that as member of the Senate Commerce Committee he persuaded committee chairman John McCain, R-Ariz., to drop a provision that would have stripped $150 million from the project and ended the insurance funding loophole.

Kerry actually was angered by the loophole but didn't want money stripped from the project because it would hurt his constituents who needed the Boston project finished, spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter said.

When the "AIG investment scheme (came) to light, John Kerry called for public hearings to investigate the parties involved and the legality of the investment practices. However, he firmly believed cutting funding for the Big Dig was not the answer," Cutter said.

Instead of McCain's bluntly worded legislation, Kerry asked for a committee hearing in May 2000. Kerry thanked McCain at the start of the hearing for dropping his legislation and an AIG executive was permitted to testify that he believed the company's work for the Big Dig was a good thing even though it was criticized by federal auditors.

Asked why Kerry would subsequently accept a trip and money from AIG in 2001 and 2002 if he was angered by the investment scheme, Cutter replied: "Any contributions AIG made to the senator's campaign came years after the investigation. Throughout his career, John Kerry has stood up to special interests on behalf of average Americans. This case is no different."

The New York-based insurer, one of the world's largest, declined to comment on its donations to Kerry, simply stating, "AIG never requested any assistance from Senator Kerry concerning the insurance we provided the Big Dig."

The project has become a symbol of government contracting gone awry, known for its huge cost overruns that now total several billion dollars, and its admissions of mismanagement.

During the 1990s, Sens. Kerry and Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., helped win new federal funding for the project as its costs skyrocketed and threatened to burden the state's government. In 1998, Kerry was credited with winning $100 million in new federal funding.

But in 1999, the Transportation Department uncovered a financing scheme in which the project had overpaid $129.8 million to AIG for worker compensation and liability insurance that wasn't needed, then had allowed the insurer to keep the money in a trust and invest it in the market. The government alleged AIG kept about half of the profits it made from the investments, providing the other half to the project.

Outraged by the revelations, McCain submitted legislation that would have stripped $150 million from the Big Dig and banned the practice of allowing an insurer to invest and profit from excessive premiums paid with government money. "Any refunds of insurance premiums or reserve amounts, including interest, that exceed a project's liabilities shall be immediately returned to the federal government," McCain's legislation declared.

But Kerry and Kennedy intervened, and McCain withdrew the legislation.

(Published: February 5, 2004)
12 posted on 02/05/2004 12:44:39 PM PST by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Ducking and weaving. Trying to do a rope-a-dope on the voters.
14 posted on 02/05/2004 12:46:44 PM PST by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Pompous windbag.
15 posted on 02/05/2004 12:48:09 PM PST by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Well, we still have one hope. If Dean drops out, maybe Algore will support Kerry-- then he's doomed.
19 posted on 02/05/2004 12:49:40 PM PST by Mark (Treason doth never prosper, for if it prosper, NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
"There was a right way to hold Saddam Hussein accountable," including working through the United Nations and "living up to the words 'last resort."

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."

Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

21 posted on 02/05/2004 12:52:22 PM PST by love n hate tattoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
In his campaigning around the country for numerous democratic hopefuls it is said that Clinton is doing the work of three men:

Larry, Moe and Curly.

Which one are you Johnny? The missing link?

26 posted on 02/05/2004 12:59:46 PM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
"living up to the words 'last resort."

Interpretation: Doing nothing until it's too late to do something useful.

They should try to pin him down on exactly what it would have taken for him to make the decision to go into Iraq. It would be more lies, but it would also be amusing to watch.

31 posted on 02/05/2004 1:10:04 PM PST by trebb (Ain't God good . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
A winner never quits and a quitter never wins

But Democrats do not support or endorse Winners and Achievers.
Democrats would rather not keep score.
Democrats would rather outlaw dodge-ball!
If there are winners, then their must be losers and we sure don't want to hurt their feeling, do we?

32 posted on 02/05/2004 1:10:31 PM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
DYKWIA?

"I never run away from a fight. Instead, I try to disappear into the crowd."

33 posted on 02/05/2004 1:13:17 PM PST by amordei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
The next time Kerry and his Demo friends criticize our effort in Iraq, he should consider this:

It took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno to take the Branch Davidian compound. That was a 51-day operation.

It took less time to find Saddam's sons in Iraq than it took Hillary Clinton to find the Rose Law Firm billing records.

It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to destroy the Medina Republican Guard than it took Teddy Kennedy to call the police after his Oldsmobile sunk at Chappaquiddick.

It took less time to take Iraq than it took to count the votes in Florida!!!!!!

Damn our military is GREAT


34 posted on 02/05/2004 1:15:21 PM PST by dmzTahoe (Go Zags!!!...#8 and still rising.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Kerry did not specifically defend his vote on Iraq, but said,

"There was a right way to hold Saddam Hussein accountable," including working through the United Nations and "living up to the words 'last resort."'

What a maroon this Kerry is -

From Powell's opening remarks to the UN:


New York City
February 5, 2003

...

Last November 8, this Council passed Resolution 1441 by a unanimous vote. The purpose of that resolution was to disarm Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction. Iraq had already been found guilty of material breach of its obligations stretching back over 16 previous resolutions and 12 years.

Resolution 1441 was not dealing with an innocent party, but a regime this Council has repeatedly convicted over the years.

Resolution 1441 gave Iraq one last chance, one last chance to come into compliance or to face serious consequences. No Council member present and voting on that day had any illusions about the nature and intent of the resolution or what serious consequences meant if Iraq did not comply.

Over 16 previous resolutions and 12 years.

I think that says HOW effective the UN is without action (by us - the US)) to back up those words.

37 posted on 02/05/2004 1:24:48 PM PST by _Jim ( <--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
What Kerry doing? Shadow boxing?
40 posted on 02/05/2004 1:42:18 PM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
With a head the size of a pumpkin I wouldnt yell that too loud..too damn easy to lay the dukes or boots to a melon that big...
42 posted on 02/05/2004 1:46:48 PM PST by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
He's not too smart. He should have learned his lesson from Howard Dean. People don't like brash in-your-face pompous politicians. You need high likability to be President. Reagan had it. George W. Bush has it. Kerry doesn't.
44 posted on 02/05/2004 2:01:16 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson