Freepmail me if you want on/off this ping list.
Posted on 02/02/2004 5:40:58 AM PST by OXENinFLA
I find it odd when I hear people say they "Don't pay attention to politics".
Let me see if I understand this correctly.
They don't pay attention to the people that write the laws they have to live by?
Then of course yell and complain about all these new laws AFTER they are in effect.
That brings me to the point of this thread.
Here I'd like have an outlet to direct my yelling and complain DURING the process of the laws being made. Along with those wonderful and witty remarks made by our elected officials.
And also to give fellow Freepers links to various helpful Government web sites so they can research further and add to the thread.
Where to begin? (At the beginning, of course.)
C-SPAN what a great thing. Where you can watch or listen live to most Government happenings. (I'd like stress this on little thing about C-SPAN that I love, NO COMMERCIAL INTERRUPTIONS.)
C-SPAN 1 carries the HOUSE.
C-SPAN 2 carries the SENATE.
C-SPAN 3 (most places web only) carries a variety of committee meetings live or other past programming.
A great thing about our Government is they make it really easy for the public to research what the Politicians are doing and saying (on the floor anyway).
THOMAS where you can see a RECORD of what Congress is doing each day. You can also search/read a verbatim text of what each Congressmen/women or Senator has said on the floor or submitted 'for the record.' [This is where the real juicy stuff can be found.]
Also found at Thomas are Monthly Calendars for the Majority and Minority
(I'd like to rant for a second. Prior to Senator Frist's office running the calendar any bills and amendments talked about would be linked on the calendar the next day. Now all you get is when the Senate will meet and the bill # without a link. I'd like to see it change back.)
Roll Call Votes can be found here.
1:00 p.m.: Convene and begin a period of morning business.
2:00 p.m.: Resume consideration of the motion to proceed to S.1072, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible and Efficient Transportation Equity Act.
Freepmail me if you want on/off this ping list.
Bob Graham (D-FL):Penetrating these organizations will require a new, more aggressive human intelligence capability. Osama and his cohorts are unlikely to turn up at an embassy cocktail party. We must be capable of getting human sources close to the leaders of these organizations. John Walker Lindh was a misguided California college student who became a member of al-Qaida and even met Osama bin Laden. Unfortunately, John Walker Lindh did not work for the CIA.
I can't wait for Graham to leave the Senate.
I'm not sure how this whole Ricin thing is going to effect the days ahead.
Freepmail me if you want on/off this ping list.
Floor Schedule for Tuesday, February 3, 2004.
9:45 a.m.: Convene and begin a period of morning business.
10:30 a.m.: Resume consideration of S.1072, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible and Efficient Transportation Equity Act.
Mr. SMITH. Mr. President, I rise today to speak about the need for hate crimes legislation. On May 1, 2003, Senator Kennedy and I introduced the Local Law Enforcement Enhancement Act, a bill that would add new categories to current hate crimes law, sending a signal that violence of any kind is unacceptable in our society.
I wish I could be more specific in discussing the involvement of foreign governments in the 9-11 plot. Unfortunately, the administration will not allow me to do so. After 7 months of effort to de-classify the report that we filed on December 20, 2002, the CIA, the FBI and other agencies decided to keep significant portions secret. In particular, there are 27 pages that were virtually completely censored. These are pages 396 through 422 from Part Four of the report, which is entitled, ``Finding, Discussion and Narrative Regarding Certain Sensitive National Security Matters.''
This censorship is troubling for a number of reasons. First, it reduces the information available to the public about some of the most important government actions--or to be more accurate, inactions--prior to September 11. Second, it precludes the American people from asking their government legitimate questions, such as:
Was there a reason that some, but not all, of the terrorists were receiving foreign support while they were in the United States?
Or is it not more likely that they were all receiving similar support?
What evidence do we have that the infrastructure of support that existed prior to 9-11 has been dismantled?
Or is it not more likely that such an infrastructure is still in place for the next generation of terrorists?
How many trained operatives of al-Qaida, Hezbollah, and other international terrorist organizations are there inside the United States of America?
What are the skills and capabilities of these operatives?
What was the scale and skills of Iraqi operatives inside the United States prior to the war in Iraq and at the current date?
What was the comparative threat to the people of the United States of Iraq and the trained agents of international terrorists placed inside our country?
Has the number, skill set, funding or ability to avoid disclosure of international terrorist operatives within the United States of America been enhanced by support from foreign governments?
How professional and aggressive have been the efforts of agencies such as the FBI and the CIA in answering those questions?
And, how was the information that our government might have had prior to September 11th utilized after September 11th to enhance the security of our homeland and American interests abroad?
Unfortunately, almost 2 1/2 years after the tragedy, the administration and the Congress--in the main--have not initiated the reforms necessary to reduce the chances of another 9-11. Given the seriousness of that situation, some of what was withheld from this report bordered on the absurd. For examples of the absurdity, some of the information censored from these pages actually appears in other parts of the report. Let me cite three examples.
First, much of the censored information about Omar al-Bayoumi is available on pages 173-175. Mr. Bayoumi was an employee of the Saudi Civil Aviation Authority and a suspected Saudi intelligence agent based in California. He had extensive contacts with two of the Saudi hijackers, Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi. The same day that Bayoumi picked up the hijackers at a restaurant in Los Angeles, he had attended a prior meeting at the Saudi consulate in Los Angeles. Bayoumi co-signed a lease for the two hijackers, paid their first month's rent, hosted a welcome party for them, helped them get driver's licenses and flight school applications. He also introduced them to others who served as their translator and in other support roles.
Second, much of the censored information about Osama Bassnan, another Saudi national who was a neighbor of the two hijackers in San Diego, which appears on pages 175 through 177.
Third, much of the information about a San Diego business manager which was censored also appears on pages 179 and 180.
I would note that the declassified sections of the report point out that, despite public assurances from U.S. officials that Saudi Arabia has cooperated in counter terrorism efforts, the Joint Inquiry received testimony that Saudi officials in fact ``had been uncooperative and often did not act on information implicating Saudi nationals.''
[Page: S341] GPO's PDF
What this indicates is that in the months following the release of our recommendation that the administration ``aggressively'' address the foreign government involvement in 9-11, the Bush administration not only failed to pursue and investigate foreign government involvement, the administration misused the classification process to protect the foreign governments that may have been involved in 9-11. There is no reason for the Bush administration to continue to shield make-believe allies who are supporting, either directly or indirectly, terrorists who want to kill Americans.
The recommendations we have made here are consistent with recommendations made by other bodies that have been formed to analyze our intelligence structure over the last decade. The political reality is that there is a broad agreement that these reforms need to be made, yet there is institutional resistance that has been too great to overcome.
Congress has assumed responsibility for reform of the intelligence community. Now is the time to act so that we might receive the appreciation of the American people for reducing the likelihood of another tragedy like 9-11. The consequence of inaction will be legitimate, strong and unavoidable criticism should we be struck again.
If 9-11 was not a big enough shock wave to overcome the resistance to change, what will it take?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.