Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Silent About Rush
American Spectator ^ | 01/29/04 | R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr.

Posted on 01/28/2004 9:09:57 PM PST by Pokey78

WASHINGTON -- Really, it is not very amazing that a government vendetta has been launched against Rush Limbaugh, the very successful and gifted talk show host. Governments have attempted to suppress criticism for centuries. The Founding Fathers were acutely aware of that and provided strong protections in our system of government for dissent and for free speech. But would Thomas Jefferson, for instance, have anticipated that a journalist's fellow communicators would remain silent while one of their own was being threatened with jail?

Right now extreme measures are being taken against Limbaugh, and what impresses me more than a government's repressive measures against him is the meekness of his colleagues. First there is the quietude of the press in general. I suppose that was to be expected. Many years ago when the great dissenter, H.L. Mencken, was being harassed on a petty and very much trumped-up obscenity charge, the national press averted its gaze. At the time Mencken was no small fish. He was then considered a champion of their great cause, freedom of speech. Mencken attributed the press's cowardliness to "smugness."

Yet the American press is today highly politicized and its politics are antithetical to Limbaugh's. The press is liberal. Limbaugh is a dissident in the best sense of the word. He is conservative. That the press in general ignores the attempts to suppress him is another example of its stupendous hypocrisy, but this is not surprising.

What is surprising is the quietude of the conservative press. Why is it not hollering from its syndicated columns, its intellectual reviews, its handful of newspapers and the Fox News? I assume this is another example of what Mencken diagnosed as "smugness." Still it is dismaying.

Limbaugh has admitted to becoming hooked on prescription drugs while trying to mollify the pain he has suffered from back and ear maladies. No one disputes he suffered this pain. No one I have encountered claims he was taking the prescription medication OxyContin for kicks. If he were, I am told that there are superior drugs pursuant to kicks. Anyway, the misuse of medications and reliance on OxyContin all end in the same hell on earth. Limbaugh has involuntarily been there, and he has now sought treatment. He wants out. Every authority I have consulted tells me that given his admission and given his voluntary rehab he would normally be let off. The Hollywood coke snorters get this sort of judgment. Why not Limbaugh? Should he have been snorting coke?

But Palm Beach County prosecutors, having apparently leaked information about the case as well as some of the negotiating documents between them and Limbaugh's lawyers, now want Limbaugh to plead guilty to a felony punishable by up to five years in prison. Limbaugh's lawyer, the respected civil libertarian, Roy Black, considers this "preposterous." It is worse than that, which is presumably why the American Civil Liberties Union has filed a legal brief on behalf of Limbaugh. Another brief on his behalf has been filed by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, which wants to scotch the prosecutors' release of his medical records.

The harassment of Limbaugh provides another unlovely glimpse into the workings of the liberal elites. From the days of FDR they have used the law to persecute political opponents. FDR used the IRS and FBI against such an array of opponents from former Secretary of the Treasury Andrew Mellon, to publishers Moses Annenberg and Col. Robert R. McCormick, to labor leader John L. Lewis. All were innocent. Limbaugh is in good company.

Still it is repulsive to see the rest of the press sitting quietly by. That Limbaugh, a first offender and recovering addict to pain killers rather than street drugs, is being unfairly harassed is clear to anyone but a political zealot. Conceivably his harassment will end in court appearances and even a jail term. Will that please his opponents? "We got Limbaugh on an OxyContin charge." It might be a first.


R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. is the editor in chief of The American Spectator, a contributing editor to the New York Sun, and an Adjunct Fellow at the Hudson Institute. His Madame Hillary: The Dark Road to the White House is being published in February by Regnery Publishing.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: jr; remmetttyrrell; rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 01/28/2004 9:09:58 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
God Bless Rush Limbaugh
2 posted on 01/28/2004 9:15:55 PM PST by ChadsDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
As usual, Tyrrell nails the truth and upholds conservative principles. Tyrrell has a book coming out soon (Feb) on that great fraud Hillary Clinton. I hope all Freepers will buy and read it. She may be the next un-Dean if Kerry cannot fool enough Democrats into letting him become the Dukakis of 2004.
3 posted on 01/28/2004 9:17:15 PM PST by elhombrelibre (Liberalism corrupts. Absolute Liberalism corrupts absolutely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Bttt.
4 posted on 01/28/2004 9:19:15 PM PST by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
I've never understood "btt." What does it mean?

All the best,
5 posted on 01/28/2004 9:22:07 PM PST by elhombrelibre (Liberalism corrupts. Absolute Liberalism corrupts absolutely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/574593/posts explains some of the little things like bttt...
6 posted on 01/28/2004 9:24:43 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (The only good news for Democrats is they could save $$ by switching to Geico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
Better yet - click this: http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a1fed9e6421.htm
7 posted on 01/28/2004 9:25:47 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (The only good news for Democrats is they could save $$ by switching to Geico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
btt - bump to the top
8 posted on 01/28/2004 9:26:27 PM PST by Mean Daddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
Bump is used when someone wants to post a reply to a thread simply to "bump" it back to the top of the "Latest Posts" list so more visitors will see it. BTTT - "Back To The Top" is used interchangeably with "Bump".

Revised & Updated! -- THE LEXICON OF FREEREPUBLIC

9 posted on 01/28/2004 9:26:32 PM PST by Pokey78 (Steyn: Leftists demonize Wolfowitz because his name begins with a big scary animal and ends Jewishly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
Bttt - Bump to the top, not Btt
10 posted on 01/28/2004 9:27:03 PM PST by Mean Daddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78; holdonnow
The silence is shameful.
11 posted on 01/28/2004 9:29:52 PM PST by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. Impeach activist judges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy
I thought bttt was the sound of someone sticking out one's tongue and giving the "raspberries" in disgust.
12 posted on 01/28/2004 9:30:00 PM PST by graycamel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
Bttt means "Back To The Top"... this is from the old days when there was no way to search for a thread... once it scrolled off the "latest posts" page it was gone, unless you knew the URL, had a bookmark set or could get it from your browser's cache.

So, we used to "bump" threads to make them show up on the latest posts page in order to give them a wider audience.

Has it been 6 years already? Time flies.


13 posted on 01/28/2004 9:31:40 PM PST by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
E-mail the prosecuter and tell him what you think of this harrassment. Be civil, please.

Let Limbaugh prosecuter know how you feel!

14 posted on 01/28/2004 9:32:31 PM PST by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. Impeach activist judges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
I first got here in '98 back when Drudge had a link off of his site. Too bad he's not got one today so more people would know the site.
15 posted on 01/28/2004 9:33:54 PM PST by elhombrelibre (Liberalism corrupts. Absolute Liberalism corrupts absolutely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
Matt had a link for a long time, but after the food fights in '99 he deep-sixed it.
16 posted on 01/28/2004 9:35:21 PM PST by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
I recall. It's regrettable that we fight amongst ourselves so much and don't direct more fire at those whose positons we're really are against.
17 posted on 01/28/2004 9:40:56 PM PST by elhombrelibre (Liberalism corrupts. Absolute Liberalism corrupts absolutely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ChadsDad
>>>God Bless Rush Limbaugh

Ditto.

18 posted on 01/28/2004 9:47:52 PM PST by Reagan Man (The choice is clear. Reelect BUSH-CHENEY in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre; Prince Charles
IMHO, Drudge needs to get over it already. Maybe he's mad that FR frequently scoops him! ;)
19 posted on 01/28/2004 9:51:00 PM PST by ru4liberty (I don't know what tomorrow holds, but I know Who holds tomorrow. May His Name ever be praised!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Rush, Tyrrell, and Reagan have a lot in common. They stand up for the truth and they stand by their friends.
20 posted on 01/28/2004 9:52:04 PM PST by elhombrelibre (Liberalism corrupts. Absolute Liberalism corrupts absolutely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson