Skip to comments.
FReep Senate poll on capture of Saddam
Senate Republican Conference ^
Posted on 01/14/2004 1:41:19 PM PST by Phantom Lord
Quick Poll
Is the world better off now that the U.S. has captured Saddam Hussein, or would it be better had the U.S. never invaded Iraq?
The world is actually in worse condition, and Saddam should still be in power because the U.S. acted rashly. Better off now that the U.S. is upholding U.N. resolutions and holding Saddam accountable for his actions.
The condition of the world is the same now as it was before the war in Iraq.
Needs a FReeping
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: capture; iraq; saddam; saftey; terror; un
To: Phantom Lord
Seriously....BUMP
2
posted on
01/14/2004 1:43:38 PM PST
by
WVNan
(Hell is ......like, so uncool.)
To: WVNan
FReeped
3
posted on
01/14/2004 2:01:44 PM PST
by
scott0347
To: Phantom Lord
The anti's are winning. This must be up at DU.
4
posted on
01/14/2004 2:08:06 PM PST
by
j_tull
(created by God and endowed by Him with certain inalienable rights which no civil authority may usurp)
To: Phantom Lord
I strongly encourage FREEPERS to take the poll and help the Senate Republican . . . . conference?
SADLY, at the moment--the nays have it by quite a margin.
5
posted on
01/14/2004 2:38:17 PM PST
by
Quix
(Particularly quite true conspiracies are rarely proven until it's too late to do anything about them)
To: Phantom Lord
I don't like the crap about "upholding UN resolutions."
6
posted on
01/14/2004 2:39:23 PM PST
by
Sloth
("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
To: j_tull
I saw it on DU this morning. They have been hitting it hard. Who else would think that people would be better off with Saddam in power?
7
posted on
01/14/2004 2:41:22 PM PST
by
MamaB
To: j_tull
Freeped 52 to 40 anti's still ahead.
8
posted on
01/14/2004 2:43:17 PM PST
by
encm(ss)
To: Phantom Lord
I posted the same poll a while ago and the Admin's pulled it. Claimed they didn't care what was going on at Duh. can someone explain this bit of hypocrisy to me? I see references to Duu around here all the time, see above.
To top it off someone actually accused me of being a duu for putting it up.
Same poll, dim's are killing it and FR tells me they aren't interested in allowing us to respond to a poll from the Senate Republican Conference?
What gives?
9
posted on
01/14/2004 2:45:48 PM PST
by
gimmealewinsky
(Send the frenchies to show'em how to surrender...)
To: gimmealewinsky
Is the world better off should have read; is America better off? More of this nonsense insinuating that the US is the world policeman.
10
posted on
01/14/2004 2:55:37 PM PST
by
meenie
To: Phantom Lord
This poll is bogus because you can set your browser to high privacy which will stop the cookie it tries to send to you. I just voted 100 times. Polls like this are worthless. Just let it go (or vote, vote, vote).
IE Explorer
Tools
Internet Options
Privacy
Move Slider to High
Begin voting until your heart is content
Codeflier
To: meenie
That's a good pt. and the inference that we did this to help support the UN, and help its legitimacy. What a useless money hole that little club is.
12
posted on
01/14/2004 3:16:17 PM PST
by
gimmealewinsky
(Send the frenchies to show'em how to surrender...)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson