Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court Voids a Bush Move on Energy
The New York Times ^ | January 14, 2004 | Matthew L. Wald

Posted on 01/14/2004 9:09:00 AM PST by SunkenCiv

Should be titled, "Court acts illegally on energy":

Court Voids a Bush Move on Energy
by Matthew L. Wald
January 14, 2004
The rule, which applies to central air-conditioners for houses, was one of several published by the Clinton administration during its last few days in office. It was effectively rescinded in a memorandum sent by Andrew H. Card Jr., chief of staff in the Bush White House, to the Energy Department, which formally acted in the early months of the new administration. Tuesday's decision, by a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in New York, appears to put limits on the power of a new president to reverse policies of his predecessor. It establishes that once a rule is published in the Federal Register, it cannot be reversed without a lengthy administrative process, even if it has not yet taken effect; the air-conditioner rule does not become effective until 2006... Eliot Spitzer, attorney general of one plaintiff, New York State, said... that the decision made an important procedural point. "The chief of staff of the president," he said, "cannot unilaterally say rules that have been issued will not take effect."

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Philosophy; US: California; US: Connecticut; US: Maine; US: Massachusetts; US: Nevada; US: New Hampshire; US: New Jersey; US: New York; US: Rhode Island; US: Vermont
KEYWORDS: bjornlomberg; bjornlomborg; courtpacking; courts; energy; energycrisis; environment; georgewbush; globalwarming; greenhouseeffect; stoptheexcerpts; water
requires free, no-strings registration, but note that articles and op-eds are not typically online for more than a week or four.
1 posted on 01/14/2004 9:09:01 AM PST by SunkenCiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: SunkenCiv
Government wants stricter efficiency rules for air conditioners posted by Joe Montana on 11/23/99
3 posted on 01/14/2004 9:15:56 AM PST by snopercod (I talk to myself because I like dealing with a better class of people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
No need to excerpt articles in the NYT.

FMCDH

4 posted on 01/14/2004 9:23:34 AM PST by nothingnew (The pendulum is swinging and the Rats are in the pit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Tuesday's decision, by a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in New York, appears to put limits on the power of a new president to reverse policies of his predecessor. It establishes that once a rule is published in the Federal Register, it cannot be reversed without a lengthy administrative process, even if it has not yet taken effect; the air-conditioner rule does not become effective until 2006.

This is ridiculous. I sure hope it gets reversed on appeal.

5 posted on 01/14/2004 9:38:54 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
This efficiency standard for air-conditioners was so important for the environment that Klintoon decreed it in the last minutes of his term in office.

Bah Humbug!

6 posted on 01/14/2004 10:18:01 AM PST by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
ping
7 posted on 01/14/2004 10:31:51 AM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RicocheT
Clinton...the gift that keeps on giving...

(overturn on appeal before it goes into effect in '06...sheesh!!)

8 posted on 01/14/2004 11:14:09 AM PST by 88keys (never vote for a person who can do nothing right...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson