Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why isn't CND cheering Bush?
The Sunday Telegraph (U.K.) ^ | 01/11/04 | Leo McKinstry

Posted on 01/10/2004 7:24:16 PM PST by Pokey78

The Stars and Stripes should be now flying over the Islington headquarters of CND. Yes, the anti-nuclear pressure group still exists and has been at the forefront of the current anti-war movement. Within CND HQ, the peace activists should be raising their glasses of organic carrot juice in gratitude to President George W Bush. For the ostensible aim of CND is make the world a safer place by reductions in arsenals of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons.

Through his toughness, the President is triumphantly achieving that goal. Only last week North Korea offered to suspend the testing and production of nuclear weapons, following the recent promise by Libya to give up all its weapons of mass destruction. In December, Iran agreed to a new round of UN inspections, as well as the suspension of its uranium enrichment programme. Best of all, the shadow of Saddam Hussein, who was obsessed with the development of a nuclear capability, has been removed.

It might be thought that CND's members would rejoice at Mr Bush's success in demilitarising the most dangerous regimes on the planet. But they could not care less. Trapped in their anti-Western ideology, they continue to trumpet the claim that America represents the greatest threat to world peace, wilfully ignoring the obvious truth that it is the reality of US force which persuades - or compels - rogue states to disarm.

Such myopia has been at the heart of CND since its creation in 1958. Peace campaigners have only ever been interested in British or American disarmament. They never marched against Soviet missile programmes, never organised demonstrations outside the Chinese embassy. I should know, because I was a member of CND for most of the 1980s, driven by the shallow, self-righteous emotionalism which consumes so many young people. But every CND event with which I was involved was anti-American and anti-British in flavour.

The fall of the Berlin Wall made me grow up. I recognised that the Soviet Empire was destroyed by American might, not candle-lit vigils. There are, though, some deluded souls who still believe the West can protect itself through unilateral pacifism. This amounts to nothing more than cowardice, as CND admitted last year in explaining its opposition to action in Iraq: "War greatly increases the risk that instead of being disarmed, Iraq's weapons of mass destruction may be used." So, like Mr Bush and Tony Blair, CND actually believed Saddam had WMD, but was too terrified to do anything about them.

But fear is often accompanied by something much more sinister. In 1945, George Orwell wrote of those "intellectual pacifists whose real, though unacknowledged, motive appears to be a hatred of western democracy and an admiration for totalitarianism". Over the last three decades, that has been precisely the spirit of CND. During the Cold War, too many activists were pro-Soviet in outlook. Even today, the leader of CND, Kate Hudson, is a member of the Communist Party. At a Left-wing conference in 1997, she gave a speech lamenting "the passing of the Soviet Union and the Berlin Wall".

CND's instinct for supporting the enemies of the West has now been translated into a grotesque partnership with Islamic fundamentalism. In campaigning against Bush, CND is now in a formal alliance with the Muslim Association of Britain, a viciously anti-Semitic organisation which refuses to condemn al-Qaeda. Dr Azzam Tamini, the association's spokesman, has said: "The Israelis have guns; we have human bombs. We love death; they love life," hardly the sentiments of pacifism. But CND has always been more vexed by the resolution of those who protect our freedom than those would destroy it.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: cnd
CND = Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament
1 posted on 01/10/2004 7:24:16 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
17 Ohio 590.00
17
34.71
440
1.34
582.25
18

Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

2 posted on 01/10/2004 7:25:35 PM PST by Support Free Republic (Freepers post from sun to sun, but a fundraiser bot's work is never done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Same thing happened with Reagan. Instead of BS arms reduction treaties that were waiting to be violated, Reagan lowered the threat of nuclear war by actually defeating the USSR. Imagine that. Peace through strength.
3 posted on 01/10/2004 7:27:13 PM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Peace campaigners have only ever been interested in British or American disarmament

Here's your answer.

They think they'd prefer living under Islamic rule, but the reality is that they'd be the first to be swinging from the lamposts under a Sharia'h regime.

4 posted on 01/10/2004 7:30:13 PM PST by Guillermo (It's tough being a Miami Dolphins fan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Article is right on target.

"Such myopia has been at the heart of CND since its creation in 1958. Peace campaigners have only ever been interested in British or American disarmament. They never marched against Soviet missile programmes, never organised demonstrations outside the Chinese embassy. I should know, because I was a member of CND for most of the 1980s, driven by the shallow, self-righteous emotionalism which consumes so many young people. But every CND event with which I was involved was anti-American and anti-British in flavour."

Another sad lesson learned on getting in bed with the left.

5 posted on 01/10/2004 7:31:37 PM PST by reed_inthe_wind (That Hillary really knows how to internationalize my MOJO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby
I remember the cry of the Hate Reagan crowd (US and European) was that Reagan would get us into nuclear war.

They cringed when Reagan called the USSR the "Evil Empire," just like the wackos of today cringe when they hear Bush talking in terms like "good and evil."
6 posted on 01/10/2004 7:31:40 PM PST by Guillermo (It's tough being a Miami Dolphins fan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Why isn't CND cheering Bush?

Because honesty, much less consistency, is not valued by the Left. The only thing they revere is power -- in their hands. Everything else can be sacrificed in that pursuit.

7 posted on 01/10/2004 7:32:17 PM PST by Eala (Sacrificing tagline fame for... TRAD ANGLICAN RESOURCE PAGE: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reed_inthe_wind
Another sad lesson learned on getting in bed with the left.

Getting in bed with the left? Hell I bet they were founded and funded by Soviet agents.

8 posted on 01/10/2004 7:39:10 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I am amazed that so few people have figured these guys out yet.
9 posted on 01/10/2004 7:40:48 PM PST by McGavin999 (Don't be a Freeploader-Have you donated yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
PJ O'Rourke's "Holidays In Hell" contains a hilarious visit by him to the CND offices right after Reagan bombed Libya.
10 posted on 01/10/2004 7:42:38 PM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
What the heck is CND? Don't these JR "jounalists" know that they are supposed to write out the complete name before inserting the acronym? Cuckoo-No brained-Dems? Yeah, that's right!
11 posted on 01/10/2004 7:45:01 PM PST by Libertina (If it moves, tax it. If it doesn't move it's a sitting duck - tax it TWICE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Why isn't CND cheering Bush?

Because they're a bumch of Marxists.

12 posted on 01/10/2004 7:54:00 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
This says it all.
13 posted on 01/10/2004 8:48:42 PM PST by baseballmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"Such myopia has been at the heart of CND since its creation in 1958. Peace campaigners have only ever been interested in British or American disarmament."

YES, BUT THAT WAS BECAUSE IT WAS A FRONT GROUP FOR THE COMMUNISTS AND THE SOVIET UNION!!

14 posted on 01/10/2004 9:16:49 PM PST by WOSG (I dont want the GOP to become a circular firing squad and the Socialist Democrats a majority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertina
I had to google to find out myself: Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament.
15 posted on 01/11/2004 8:11:22 AM PST by kaylar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kaylar
Thanks Kaylar - I guess we're out of touch with extremist leftie pop kulture vocabulary ;)
16 posted on 01/11/2004 5:52:54 PM PST by Libertina (If it moves, tax it. If it doesn't move it's a sitting duck - tax it TWICE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson