To: RolandBurnam
Her husband also is seeking that amount in damages, claiming that as a result of his wife's injuries he has been deprived of her attention and comfort and suffered a loss of consortium.
Oh, for the love of Mike. For consortium, use of her foot is not strictly needed.
6 posted on
01/08/2004 8:34:01 AM PST by
Xenalyte
(I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
To: Xenalyte
For consortium, use of her foot is not strictly needed.
That's not the case in West Hollwood, from what I understand....of course, there isn't any "she" involvement over there.
12 posted on
01/08/2004 8:36:27 AM PST by
ErnBatavia
(Some days you're the windshield; some days you're the bug)
To: Xenalyte
Oh, for the love of Mike. For consortium, use of her foot is not strictly needed.You must have lived a very sheltered life...
15 posted on
01/08/2004 8:38:06 AM PST by
Poohbah
("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
To: Xenalyte
> For consortium, use of her foot is not strictly needed.
Oh, I don't know...where's your imagination. ;-p
21 posted on
01/08/2004 8:41:55 AM PST by
MrConfettiMan
(Whatever happened to Preparations A through G?)
To: Xenalyte
" For consortium, use of her foot is not strictly needed."
Perhaps that has nothing to do with the foot, but rather he needed the bag to put over her head.
55 posted on
01/08/2004 10:46:59 AM PST by
Grig
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson