Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Families First Tax Reform Plan
Gen. Clark's campaign website ^ | Gen. Wesley Clark

Posted on 01/05/2004 12:39:12 PM PST by phil_will1

Monday in Nashua, New Hampshire General Wes Clark announced his Families First Tax Reform, the most sweeping tax plan to be offered by a presidential candidate in years. His tax-simplification plan will make the tax code more progressive, relieve the working-family squeeze and reduce poverty.

Under the Clark plan, a family of four making up to $50,000 will pay no federal income taxes, and all tax-paying families making up to $100,000 with children will get a tax cut.

"The bottom line: our tax system is broken," Clark said, "and I want to fix it. The Republicans are always talking about family values. It's time in America that we started valuing families. It's time we put America's families first again."

Families like Lance and Leah Adams from Jaffrey, New Hampshire, see the benefits of this plan. Lance is a construction site supervisor and earns $42,000 per year. Leah develops a website for a non-profit organization. She makes $3,500 per year - just enough to pay for day care for their two children, Sophie and Owen.

Clark's tax reform plan is designed for families like the Adams. Under his plan, they won't pay any federal income tax. Instead, they'll receive a check from the U.S. government, for a total tax break of $1,500.

"I believe those who work hard and excel should be rewarded," Clark said. "But I also believe that all Americans must share the burden of preserving our country. Freedom is not free - all of us benefit from the liberty and laws of our great nation, and the protections bestowed by our Constitution. We all have a responsibility to contribute our fair share."

Relief for working families will be fully paid for by closing corporate loopholes and by a five percentage point rate increase on income greater than $1 million per year. The rate increase will only affect the top 0.1 percent of taxpayers. 99.9 percent of taxpayers will not pay a dime more.

Families First Tax Reform is Straightforward.

Families will only need to fill out a three-line form to find out if they need to pay federal income taxes, providing their income, number of children, and marital status. The majority of families will no longer be required to file tax forms at all.

Families First Tax Reform is Progressive.

It provides relief for middle-income parents struggling not to fall behind in the Bush economy and to lower-income families struggling to lift themselves out of poverty.

Families First Tax Reform is Responsible.

The plan will provide $33 billion annually in tax relief for working families without increasing the deficit. "Wes Clark's Families First Tax Reform is a bold tax reform plan that is good for hard-pressed, working, American families and good for the American economy," said Laura Tyson, Dean of the London Business School and a former top advisor to President Bill Clinton.

"It provides much needed simplification to the U.S. income tax code; it offers substantial tax relief to lower- and middle-income families struggling to make ends meet; it reduces poverty; it restores progressivity to the federal income tax at a time when income and wealth inequalities in the United States are at record highs and continuing to rise; and it is fiscally responsible."

Under President Bush, typical families have seen their incomes fall by nearly $1,500 - while Bush provided an average tax cut of $128,000 to taxpayers making more than $1 million.

"Right now, the sad fact is that too many Americans are working harder and harder and earning less and less," Clark said.

Under Wes Clark's Families First Tax Reform:

A married couple with two children making $50,000 will get a $1,583 tax break, meaning they will pay no federal income tax at all.

A married couple with three children earning $21,000 annually will get a $2,287 tax break.

A married couple with two children making $85,000 will get a $975 tax cut.

31 million working families will get tax relief, with the typical family getting a $1,477 tax cut. "We need a higher standard of leadership in America," Clark concluded. "One that puts America's interests above special interests. One that promotes open, honest government, and holds its leaders accountable with real, measurable goals. And not just for the next election, but for the next generation."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2003; clintonistas; lauratyson; reform; sockpuppet; taxes; taxreform; wesleyclark; whataweasel
Oh terrific! Another version of the income tax in the name of simplification. When will they ever understand that the whole notion of a simple income tax as a way of efficiently raising the federal government's revenues is a complete oxymoron? We have been trying to do this for almost 90 years now and it is a complete and absolute failure!
1 posted on 01/05/2004 12:39:12 PM PST by phil_will1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
4 New York 716.00
18
39.78
669
1.07
308.00
19

Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

2 posted on 01/05/2004 12:40:34 PM PST by Support Free Republic (If Woody had gone straight to the police, this would never have happened!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1
A tax plan designed for the Adams family ???
3 posted on 01/05/2004 12:49:39 PM PST by HEY4QDEMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1
I believe any credit/refund should be the result of taxes having been withheld, and tax refunds should not be made into another government "entitlement" program. These prostitute politicians are all sickening.
4 posted on 01/05/2004 12:51:58 PM PST by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1
If one of the Dems had the gonads to talk about eliminating the income tax and replacing it with a consumption tax, Bush wouldn't stand a chance. That in its self indicates it matters not who the president is.
5 posted on 01/05/2004 1:18:23 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1
Yeah, but people don't understand economics. They view it as zero sum. The more they get "back" from the government, the better. Period.
6 posted on 01/05/2004 1:26:34 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative ("Howard Dean is incontrovertible proof that God is on Bush's side in the 2004 election"- Dick Morris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1
When you rob Peter to pay Paul, you can always count on the support of Paul.
7 posted on 01/05/2004 1:39:59 PM PST by AmusedBystander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1
So now that I have finally raised my kids under the tax burdens, I get screwed again to help raise my neighbor's kids while that rabbit pays nothing.

Sounds too much like Bill and Hill.

The Gen’ral

I‘d say that you’re invalid,
Even though you served.
The Clintons really like you,
That’s why I am unnerved.
You seem to be a sissy,
Too light in your old loafers.
I’d say it seems for Bill and Hill,
You’re just one of their gofers.
Retired your stars and that is best,
For you’ve not got a clue.
I’d vote for Sharpton, Gen’ral Clark,
Before I’d vote for you.

Conspiracy Guy 12/17/03
8 posted on 01/05/2004 1:46:28 PM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Lazamataz stole my tagline. If you see him tell him I want it back. Soon!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drypowder
Although I share your support for a consumption tax, I seriously doubt that that issue alone would change the dynamics of this campaign. There simply aren't enough people out there who are educated on the enormous benefits that taxing consumption would provide, as much as I wish it were otherwise.

Also, as disappointed as I am that this administration has not taken a leadership position on Fundamental Tax Reform, I do believe that the President would sign the FairTax bill if it were passed by congress. I am not nearly as confident that President Dean, Clark or Gebhardt would. In that sense, it does matter who sits in the oval office relative to this issue. There is also the distinct possibility that President Bush is sincere in his previously stated desire to take up this issue in his 2nd term.
9 posted on 01/05/2004 1:48:57 PM PST by phil_will1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1
Relief for working families will be fully paid for by closing corporate loopholes and by a five percentage point rate increase on income greater than $1 million per year. The rate increase will only affect the top 0.1 percent of taxpayers. 99.9 percent of taxpayers will not pay a dime more.

More lies for the unwashed, uninformed class envy crowd. More "soak the rich" yammering. The people that will be the object of the taxation are the same people who employ the people that dumbass claims he wants to help. The solution to the increased tax burden is to layoff a proportionate amount of payroll burden or outsource to reduce labor costs while maintaining the same level of productivity. Either way, more taxation equals more unemployment.

10 posted on 01/05/2004 2:02:24 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1
I can see the three line tax form now.

A) Enter income ___________
B) Enter $50,000 ___________
C) subtract B from A ___________


If C > $0 amount you owe the government
If C < $0 amount the government owes you
11 posted on 01/05/2004 3:09:26 PM PST by nh1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1
I am not nearly as confident that President Dean, Clark or Gebhardt would. In that sense, it does matter who sits in the oval office relative to this issue

I agree that President Bush would be more apt to act on a tax code overhaul than any of the Dems but my point is that I am convinced it is not going to happen, at least in my life time. If I'm not mistaken, Clark is the only candidate thus far to even bring up the subject of changing the tax code. The tax subject does attract attention but I doubt that his plan will aid him in his run for president.

12 posted on 01/05/2004 7:45:18 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: drypowder
"The tax subject does attract attention but I doubt that his plan will aid him in his run for president."

I agree, Fundamental Tax Reform is conspicuously absent from the Presidential debate so far. I don't consider Gen. Clark's proposal, nor Gov. Dean's, to be real FTR. However, the FairTax bill is definitely picking up momentum, as evidenced by more than 40 co-sponsors on the House bill (with more to come soon), and the anticipated designation of the bill as a priority by the AFFB (American Federation of Farm Bureaus). If you haven't checked out www.fairtax.org, you definitely should.
13 posted on 01/11/2004 11:18:06 AM PST by phil_will1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson