Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S.Supreme Court could consider Muslim's suit over Mississippi flag
AJC.com ^ | 12-30-03 | By JACK ELLIOTT JR.

Posted on 12/30/2003 5:44:05 AM PST by WKB

JACKSON, Miss. -- The U.S. Supreme Court will discuss Jan. 9 whether to hear arguments in a case in which a Muslim claimed the Confederate battle emblem in Mississippi's flag is actually a Christian symbol.

Lower federal courts had rejected John Ellis Briggs' argument that the Mississippi flag contains the St. Andrew's Cross and that the symbol represents state endorsement of a particular religion.

Briggs' lawsuit seeks punitive damages of up to $77 million. It also seeks to have the symbol "removed from display in public places."

Since 1894, Mississippi's flag has contained the Confederate battle emblem, a blue X with 13 whites stars over a field of red. Experts differ on whether the X in the Confederate battle emblem is the St. Andrew's Cross.

David Sansing, professor emeritus of history at the University of Mississippi, said Monday that people have claimed erroneously for years that the cross is the St. Andrew's Cross.

"What is in the Confederate battle flag is a blue saltier. The St. Andrew's Cross is a white diagonal cross on a blue field," Sansing said. "The man who designed the (Confederate battle) flag makes no reference to the St. Andrew's Cross."

Sansing said the designer of the flag described it to Gen. P.G.T. Beauregard as a blue saltier on a red field with one star for each of the 13 Southern states.

Sansing said the St. Andrew's Cross dates back to the Middle Ages and represents the X-shaped cross on which the apostle Andrew was crucified. Andrew was the patron saint of Scotland. The St. Andrew's Cross is Scotland's national flag.

"So, he's (Briggs) wrong to begin with. It's not a Christian symbol," Sansing said.

Briggs filed suit in federal court in Gulfport in 2001. A federal judge dismissed the lawsuit in 2002. Briggs appealed to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans, which ruled against him in June.

The 5th Circuit said it could not accept that "every X, or every X the straight-line connection of whose four points would form a square, is predominantly a religious symbol."

Appeals Judge Will Garwood, writing for himself and Judges E. Grady Jolly and Jerry E. Smith, said it was clear that a community's display of the flag was not an endorsement of religion.

Garwood said the debate over the flying of the Confederate battle flag, or its being a part of a state flag, has centered on its symbolism of the Confederacy and to what extent the symbol extolled or excused slavery.

"None of this concerns any religious symbolism related to any presence of the St. Andrews Cross in the flag," Garwood wrote.

Garwood said that in 1894 -- and in 2001, when voters declined to change the flag -- the Mississippi flag included the canton corner of identical design that was created by Confederate generals in 1861. He said the design was used by Confederate forces throughout the Civil War and became well known, at least throughout the South.

Garwood said those decisions had no religious intent.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: mississippiflag; muslimamericans; purge; scotus; stateflag
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

1 posted on 12/30/2003 5:44:05 AM PST by WKB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000; Hottie Tottie; MagnoliaMS; MississippiMan; vetvetdoug; NerdDad; Rebel Coach; ...
MS ping
2 posted on 12/30/2003 5:44:57 AM PST by WKB (3!~ A fine is a tax for doing wrong.; A tax is a fine for doing well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKB
Good grief (roll eyes)
3 posted on 12/30/2003 5:47:39 AM PST by kb2614 (".....We've done nothing and were all out of ideas!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKB
Good grief (roll eyes)
4 posted on 12/30/2003 5:47:50 AM PST by kb2614 (".....We've done nothing and were all out of ideas!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kb2614
Good grief (roll eyes)

Me too


BTW LOVE your initials
5 posted on 12/30/2003 5:49:35 AM PST by WKB (3!~ A fine is a tax for doing wrong.; A tax is a fine for doing well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WKB
OTOH, the Islamic calendar which predicted the 911 Atrocities months in advance.
and the 911 Atrocities themselves, are absolutely, positively acceptable to these people.


6 posted on 12/30/2003 5:50:02 AM PST by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WKB
Well, heck. For $77million, I'll be offended too!

[We need to clean that gene pool.]
7 posted on 12/30/2003 5:50:35 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKB
If they want to sue a state for having a cross on it's flag try Maryland.

There are two crosses on the flag and officialy the flagpole has to have a cross on it when the flag is flying.
8 posted on 12/30/2003 5:55:35 AM PST by American_Centurion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKB
I was a religous symbil, look out Union Jzck!!!
9 posted on 12/30/2003 5:55:51 AM PST by U S Army EOD (When the EOD technician screws up, he is always the first to notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKB
Hmmm. Interesting that the Muslims in the UK haven't tried this one yet.
10 posted on 12/30/2003 5:56:00 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American_Centurion

11 posted on 12/30/2003 5:57:15 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WKB
What a wonderful plan these local muslims have "to win the hearts and minds" of the locals.

Yep, great plan. Piss off everyone that just recently voted to defended that very flag.

12 posted on 12/30/2003 6:01:51 AM PST by realpatriot (Tagline moved to chat-tagline moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: realpatriot
Escort him and his lawyer out of the country. Problem solved.
13 posted on 12/30/2003 6:03:46 AM PST by KEVLAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: WKB
powder..patch.. ball FIRE!

Muslims aren't going to be very popular down south really soon now....

14 posted on 12/30/2003 6:04:01 AM PST by BallandPowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKB
My response to these whining muslims is this


15 posted on 12/30/2003 6:08:23 AM PST by NeoCaveman (lost tagline, reward offered for its return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
thanks,

Here is a pic of how it should be flown.

16 posted on 12/30/2003 6:13:06 AM PST by American_Centurion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WKB
Given the madness that has overcome the SCOTUS, I'll be surprised if the Muzzies don't win.
17 posted on 12/30/2003 6:13:38 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (It's not a blanket amnesty, it's amnistia del serape!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
Interesting that the Muslims in the UK haven't tried this one yet.

They tried something similar about two years ago. Moslem postal and police employees complained mightily of having to wear the (silver or gold) royal badge on their caps ... because the badge includes the image of the royal scepter, which is topped with a (tiny) cross. The cross itself, on the badge, was about the size of the head of a match but no matter, the Moslems in uniformed civil service bleated mightily about it. (It's worth noting that, for more than a century, there were Jewish employees in those uniformed services and, if any of them ever quibbled about the badge, nobody can recall it).

The British govt almost changed the badge to accomodate the Moslems but met with really loud public opposition. It may yet happen.

18 posted on 12/30/2003 6:13:50 AM PST by DonQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Bishop Dogbert gets around.
19 posted on 12/30/2003 6:24:00 AM PST by secret garden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: secret garden
So much stupidity, so little time.
20 posted on 12/30/2003 6:26:57 AM PST by NeoCaveman (lost tagline, reward offered for its return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson