Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Federalist 78; LPM1888
I just checked out LPM1888's profile page and this is what he/she says about homosexuality, so this explains his/her support of their agenda:

"Homosexuals

Some people seem to fear homosexuals, particularly around children. There are several homosexuals in our extended family and they have never tried to entice or otherwise seduce my children. Certainly some homosexuals have been known to do so but so have straights. I suspect the percentage of pedophiles is the same in each group. Based on sheer numbers that means that there are more straights to be watched closely than gays or lesbians.

I am also firmly convinced that genetics is a major factor in sexual determination. One of my friends who is a lesbian has bodily features that are so obviously male that she alone constitutes a very strong proof of genetic disposition. Anyone she meets knows immediately that she is a lesbian and that she didn't have any choice, she's built like a Mack Truck. I also had a male cousin who was almost a full double cousin (ours fathers were brothers and our mothers are first cousins). On his side, the only genetic lineage we do not share included an uncle who was definitely homosexual and a concert musician. My double cousin was homosexual and he said he never had a desire for a female in his life, he also was an accomplished musician and had a brief career in ballet. I on the other hand am completely straight and tone deaf. Those two people have completely convinced me about the genetic aspects of homosexuality. I am proud to have both of them as family members. "


Note to LPM1888: Just because you FEEL something to be so, based on what your imperfect eyes have seen and then computed with your imperfect (limited) mind, does not make something TRUE. If you really want to know the truth about homosexuality, you need to study. If you don't want to study, that means you don't want to know the truth.

Saying that you "know" homosexuality to be genetic, and to "know" that homosexuals are no more likely to molest children than heterosexuals, is like saying that you "know" the sun to really be flat like a plate because that's how it looks to your eyes.
15 posted on 12/27/2003 7:05:02 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah
it seems the homosexuals are actually scared of the FMA stopping their agenda. hence the posts opposing the amendment. We must have them on the run.
34 posted on 12/27/2003 9:00:40 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: LPM1888; little jeremiah
I suspect the percentage of pedophiles is the same in each group.

Unfortunately you suspect incorrectly and have been sold bogus information. Homosexuals, being around 2% (including bisexuals) of the population, account for a third of child molestations. Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.

There are some here who may whine about the numbers but have nothing to rebut the information at the above links. We've said over and over that we'd stop posting this information if anybody could demonstrate with credible sources the information we post is incorrect. Still, no takers.

39 posted on 12/27/2003 9:35:34 PM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah
Note to LPM1888: Just because you FEEL something to be so, based on what your imperfect eyes have seen and then computed with your imperfect (limited) mind, does not make something TRUE. If you really want to know the truth about homosexuality, you need to study. If you don't want to study, that means you don't want to know the truth.

Saying that you "know" homosexuality to be genetic, and to "know" that homosexuals are no more likely to molest children than heterosexuals, is like saying that you "know" the sun to really be flat like a plate because that's how it looks to your eyes.

Your approach to logic is faulty. According to your logic path any course of study that doesn't lead to your prechosen result is incomplete study. That is invalid and circular logic.

In my case one of the examples I use is extremely valid because my cousin's and my own gentic make-up and environments are so similar. We are almost double cousin's. Our mothers are sisters and our fathers are half brothers. We were both raised in good homes on farms about 1/4 mile from each other. We are the same age, both male, went to the same schools, attended the same church and had the same group of friends. The only difference is in the quarter of the family tree we do not share. One of his uncles (that I do not share) who lived over a thousand miles away was homosexual and a concert musician. My cousin is strictly homosexual and a concert musician. I can't carry a tune in a bucket and am strictly hetrosexual.

Our environments were identical yet we are polar opposites sexually. The only difference is in the portion of our genetic material that we do not share. As far as I'm concerned that's a strong indication for a genetic cause.

That's proof enough for me.

As far as the supposed inclination for homosexuals to be child molesters in greater numbers than hetrosexuals is concerned I have never encounterd any homosexuals attempting to molest a child. Although that does provide conclusive evidenece of any kind it also does not seem to support your claims that homosexuals are raving sex maniacs.

71 posted on 12/27/2003 11:34:17 PM PST by LPM1888 (What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts? - Lazarus Long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson