Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Protect Marriage Without Constitutional Amendment
NewsMax.com ^ | Friday, Dec. 26, 2003 | Mike Thompson

Posted on 12/27/2003 3:08:49 PM PST by Federalist 78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-123 last
To: Kahonek
"homosexuality is not really attraction toward men, it is a form of hatred: in particular, hatred of women"

I just happened to run across this aging thread and your fascinating post. I've always wondered about this assertion. If being gay is all about the hatred of women, how come gay guys have so many close women friends?>>

They hate women *physically*. They despise real men on an emotional level because their manhood is a rebuke, but they hate women on a visceral, physical level. It's revulsion toward that which should attract, attraction toward that which should revolt.

Why? One word: MOTHER. Freud was right. Gay men are made, not born; they are trained by Mama, untrained by Dad, then recruited by Bruce, usually at a very young age.
121 posted on 01/17/2004 6:27:28 PM PST by Ronly Bonly Jones (the more things change...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Ronly Bonly Jones
I've never been much for Freudian theory, but I'm still not sure how you would explain why gay men have so many female friends if they have a visceral hatred of women, and why many of them report being attracted to "real" men if they despise them. Is this what Freud would have termed a "reaction formation?"
122 posted on 01/17/2004 6:48:46 PM PST by Kahonek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Kahonek
I've never been much for Freudian theory, but I'm still not sure how you would explain why gay men have so many female friends if they have a visceral hatred of women, and why many of them report being attracted to "real" men if they despise them. Is this what Freud would have termed a "reaction formation?">>

Possibly. I prefer to express it symbolically:

An exchange between a manly heterosexual and a gay man would reflect the dialogue between Morgana and Merlin in the movie "Excalibur".

Gay man to Real Man: "Perhaps you ache for that which you have never known."

Real Man to gay man: "Perhaps you lust for what you cannot have!"

Needless to say, the secure heterosexual's pity and contempt for the gay man is intolerable to the latter.
123 posted on 01/17/2004 7:56:54 PM PST by Ronly Bonly Jones (the more things change...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-123 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson