Skip to comments.
Iraqi officers: Al Qaida operatives were trained near Baghdad (Saddam recruited Al Qaeda)
Geostrategy Direct ^
| Dec. 30, 2003
| Geostrategy-Direct
Posted on 12/24/2003 5:33:52 PM PST by FairOpinion
Saudi nationals helped Saddam Hussein recruit and finance Al Qaida insurgents to confront U.S. troops in Iraq. Iraqi officers who have been interrogated by the United States and coalition officials said Saddam's contacts with Al Qaida preceded the group's Sept. 11, 2001 strikes on New York and Washington. They said Saudi envoys helped Al Qaida insurgents to enter Iraq and begin training in camps around Baghdad.
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaedaandiraq; insurgents; iraqiofficers; trainingcamps
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Smoking gun!!!
To: FairOpinion
I hope this is it. If it is, both the democrats and the Saudis are sunk.
To: FairOpinion
They said Saudi envoys helped Al Qaida insurgents to enter Iraq and begin training in camps around Baghdad. Our "friends" the Saudi's again. Add them to the nations that support terrorism list.
3
posted on
12/24/2003 5:36:35 PM PST
by
Reagan is King
(The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who is winning an argument with a liberal.)
To: FairOpinion
Another smoking gun like Salman Pak.
4
posted on
12/24/2003 5:36:50 PM PST
by
flamefront
(To the victor go the oils. No oil or oil-money for islamofascist weapons of mass annihilation.)
To: flamefront
"Another smoking gun like Salman Pak."
==
Which the Democrats and the media are still succeeding in ignoring, and pretending it doesn't exist.
To: FairOpinion
Of course the Mad Hatter Howard Dean will give cause to NOT believe the Iraqis.
6
posted on
12/24/2003 5:38:39 PM PST
by
rintense
To: FairOpinion
No, No, No, this never happened. Everyone knows that Iraq had nothing to do with Al Qeada terrorism and is absolutely pure and innocent.
7
posted on
12/24/2003 5:41:17 PM PST
by
Rebelbase
To: McGavin999
Eventually it will be the Saudis' turn, but Iran and Syria will come first.
Priorities, you know.
8
posted on
12/24/2003 5:42:45 PM PST
by
Publius
To: FairOpinion
Well, well, well. What do we have here?
Sure doesn't look good if Saudi envoys had ANYTHING to do with aQ ops getting into Iraq.
If true, the only question that remains is "What do we call Saudi Arabia after we take it over?"
9
posted on
12/24/2003 5:43:47 PM PST
by
Bosco
(Remember how you felt on September 11?)
To: McGavin999
I have a feeling that the administration has known that 9/11 was a Hussein project for a long time. I bet we'll hear a slow trickle of news over the next year that will make it incontrovertible.
10
posted on
12/24/2003 5:44:45 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
("I will do whatever the Americans want because I saw what happened in Iraq, and I was afraid"-Qadafi)
To: Bosco
If true, the only question that remains is "What do we call Saudi Arabia after we take it over?" TEXACO
11
posted on
12/24/2003 5:44:57 PM PST
by
AlGone2001
(If liberals must lie to advance their agenda, why is liberalism good for me?)
To: thoughtomator
I have a feeling that the administration has known that 9/11 was a Hussein project for a long time. I bet we'll hear a slow trickle of news over the next year that will make it incontrovertible. In Saddam's trial, 9/11 should be included in the offenses with which he is charged.
12
posted on
12/24/2003 5:49:18 PM PST
by
Salvey
To: Bosco
"What do we call Saudi Arabia after we take it over?"
East Texas
13
posted on
12/24/2003 5:54:19 PM PST
by
1066AD
To: FairOpinion
What, if anything, do we know about this source? This is the first time I have seen it.
14
posted on
12/24/2003 5:56:51 PM PST
by
billhilly
(If you're lurking here from DU, I trust this post will make you sick)
To: 1066AD
ping for oil.... maybe we can send Ambassador Powell to smooth ruffled robes.....
15
posted on
12/24/2003 5:59:51 PM PST
by
pointsal
To: Rebelbase
Let's face it, the media will never report and the left will never admit that there was a connection between Iraq and
al-Qaeda. Before we even moved into Iraq, common sense said that Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden were cooperating. Indeed, Clinton had flogged intelligence supporting that connection during Nov-Dec '98, when he was launching attacks on Iraq.
Once we rolled into Iraq in March, there has been a regular flow of evidence and testimony supporting the connection between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda. Hardly a week goes by without some new revelation.
But the New York Times, the Washington Post and the alphabeteers studiously ignore every development. And, to many, if these jerks don't report it, it didn't happen.
The left has a vested interest in the public's ignorance.
16
posted on
12/24/2003 6:00:13 PM PST
by
okie01
(www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
To: Salvey
It may not yet be prudent to reveal what we know about Saddam and 9/11, as that could give tips to the enemy with regard to who our spies might be, and what other SIGINT abilities we have.
17
posted on
12/24/2003 6:10:23 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
("I will do whatever the Americans want because I saw what happened in Iraq, and I was afraid"-Qadafi)
To: Bosco
The only part of Saudi Arabia with an appreciable amount of oil is the Eastern Province. It is also the only part which Mohammed never set foot in. It is entirely possible that the few genuinely pro-American elements in Saudi Arabia could declare an independent state under American protection. It would make Iraq look like a cakewalk by comparison. Without the oil province, Saudi's would basically have to go back to raising sheep, goats, dates and humping camels.
Occasional food aid could be released subject to good behavior.
To: FairOpinion
Hey don't post the tease if you don't post the full story. I am not going to sign up to read your myth.
To: FairOpinion
I truly believe the only reason the Saudis are still around is they provide near 30% of our oil. Once we make other arrangements, then ?????
20
posted on
12/24/2003 6:22:17 PM PST
by
microgood
(They will all die......most of them.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson