To: FairOpinion
Well, well, well. What do we have here?
Sure doesn't look good if Saudi envoys had ANYTHING to do with aQ ops getting into Iraq.
If true, the only question that remains is "What do we call Saudi Arabia after we take it over?"
9 posted on
12/24/2003 5:43:47 PM PST by
Bosco
(Remember how you felt on September 11?)
To: Bosco
If true, the only question that remains is "What do we call Saudi Arabia after we take it over?" TEXACO
11 posted on
12/24/2003 5:44:57 PM PST by
AlGone2001
(If liberals must lie to advance their agenda, why is liberalism good for me?)
To: Bosco
"What do we call Saudi Arabia after we take it over?"
East Texas
13 posted on
12/24/2003 5:54:19 PM PST by
1066AD
To: Bosco
The only part of Saudi Arabia with an appreciable amount of oil is the Eastern Province. It is also the only part which Mohammed never set foot in. It is entirely possible that the few genuinely pro-American elements in Saudi Arabia could declare an independent state under American protection. It would make Iraq look like a cakewalk by comparison. Without the oil province, Saudi's would basically have to go back to raising sheep, goats, dates and humping camels.
Occasional food aid could be released subject to good behavior.
To: Bosco
"What do we call Saudi Arabia after we take it over?"Dubyastan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson