Posted on 12/17/2003 7:48:18 PM PST by leu25iso
Flu May Be Worst in Decades for U.S. Kids By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: December 17, 2003
Filed at 9:52 p.m. ET
The current flu outbreak may be the worst for young U.S. children in several years, some experts say, comparing it in Western states to the Hong Kong flu of 1968-69.
A government epidemiologist and other disease doctors predict flu deaths among babies and toddlers will exceed the estimated 92 who die in an average flu year.
``We would expect that number would be higher in a season like this. It would be more than 92,'' said Dr. William Thompson of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ``The question is how high. We can't estimate that from our data.''
Even so, flu deaths among children are still rare. An average of 8,400 normally healthy children between 6 months and 24 months are hospitalized with the flu each year. The virus and its complications are the sixth-leading killer of children age 4 and under.
With the flu now widespread across half the country, large hospitals have already admitted hundreds of young patients, including a few critically ill in intensive care. Nearly all eventually get better, but the deaths have been particularly worrisome.
``What I am hearing anecdotally is this is a very, very bad season for children,'' said Dr. Walt Orenstein, director of the National Immunization Program at the CDC.
However, CDC officials cautioned they will not know for sure until the season is over whether it caused more illness or death than usual in children.
Dr. Keiji Fukuda, the CDC's head of flu epidemiology, said the flu can switch to a less virulent strain in mid-season. ``We are concerned this could be a severe year, particularly for children, but right now we don't know that and won't know it for a while,'' he said.
So far, the CDC has learned of about three dozen deaths in children and teenagers. It is unclear how that figure compares to previous years because the agency doesn't keep track of flu cases.
For the first season in four winters, the dominant flu strain is a so-called H3N2 virus, which is the most dangerous of the three main varieties of the bug. For that reason alone, experts say, the number of pediatric deaths will be higher than average.
The CDC estimates that in an average year, about 36,000 people -- including 92 children under age 4 -- die of the flu. However, the totals vary from year to year, depending on the strain that is circulating. Through the 1990s, the annual tally has ranged from 17,000 to 65,000. In a year when the more benign B-strain of flu dominates, just 24 deaths under age 4 are expected.
Flu can be a serious disease for the young because they have not built up much natural defense against the virus. Most older children and adults can fight off severe illness, even if they get sick, because previous infections have strengthened their immune systems.
This year may be especially bad because many young children have never encountered an H3N2 virus. Making matters worse, this season's virus is genetically different from the one that circulated in the late 1990s, so older children who had the flu then may not have very strong immunity.
Flu is most dangerous for youngsters who already have heart and lung problems, such as asthma, cardiac birth defects and lung damage resulting from prematurity.
However, doctors said they are especially concerned by reports of flu deaths among children who are otherwise healthy. In Colorado, where the first child flu deaths appeared, state officials said that at least four of the 11 young flu fatalities had no underlying diseases.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
If 93 are confirmed dead and the season is not over, everyone should know for sure about the more than usual deaths question.
People don't die directly from the flu. Rather, they usually die from a superinfection, that is, a bacterial infection that sets in along with the influenza (which is a virus). The bacterial infection is usually a pneumonia, and this may spread to the blood, causing overwhelming sepsis and then death (unless treated promptly and appropriately).
Then again, some experts say, it may not.
The severity of the outbreak is a pretty easy call by looking at the sequence of the Fujian virus or the frequency of infections and deaths in children.
Some experts are wishful thinkers or don't want to admit that they blew it badly in February when they approved using Panama once again (for the 4th year in a row)to price an identical vaccine that the administered to 83 million and discarded another 12 million doses.
The epidemic is VERY easy to predict by anyone paying attention.
When you have children hearing "odds are" just isn't all that comforting.
Thank you for saying this. In ALL the news reports I have listened to or read NOT ONE has said this very basic statement. Very basic, yet I would bet 7 out of ten people don't really know this.
So as a doctor I ask you, what signs do I look for in a child that is ill?
My son (2.5) had what a presume to be a nasty bout with a flu about a month ago. This was before all the media hype about the pediatric deaths but because I had read of children dying in England and my newfound paranoia re: pnuemonia (thanks to SARS) I had to bring him into the md's office twice. Second time, it was a bacterial infection, ear infection, and, luckily, amoxicillin seemed to do the job.
So, I understand why people are flooding the doctor's offices after stories of children on the mend one day and dead the next, some with no other medical problems.
So we were told by Jeane Dixon.
Science is much more reliable (and alive). The sequences of the viruses have been published, and the predictions are very easy calls.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.