Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Going Native for 2004
The NY Times ^ | 120603 | David Brooks

Posted on 12/06/2003 4:43:40 AM PST by Archangelsk

Going Native for 2004 By DAVID BROOKS

To: Tom DeLay

From: A Concerned Conservative

Dear Tom,

This week I read that you have abandoned plans to house Republicans safely on a cruise ship off the island of Manhattan during the G.O.P. convention in New York this summer. Have you paused to consider what this will mean?

It will mean that instead of spending time in a secure environment offshore, kind, decent Republicans will be wandering innocently among packs of inflamed New York liberals. They'll be subjected to long harangues that rely heavily on the words "multilateral," "Kyoto" and "John Ashcroft." They'll get condescending looks when they go into a deli and order a strawberry and chocolate chip bagel with pineapple cream cheese — a perfectly acceptable bagel option in most suburbs. They will naïvely pick up The Village Voice, thinking it contains small-town news.

When the Utah delegation pauses to say grace before dinner at Elaine's, the cultural dissonance will be so great it will be measurable on the Richter scale.

Tom, New York is not a place where Republicans can feel at home. New York has Central Park, which is a large pastoral area without a single putting green. It is a city with nearly eight million people, none of whom own riding mowers.

New Yorkers suffer from liberal anhedonia, which is the inability to derive pleasure from grossly oversized pieces of machinery. So when a Republican starts a perfectly normal conversation about the glories of his powerboat, snowmobile, combine or hemi, the liberal is likely to screech out something about the ozone layer.

New York is a city of strange rituals. The people live in these vertical gated communities they call apartment buildings, but they don't seem to have normal family structures. If a Martian landed in a Manhattan playground, he would conclude that human beings start out small and white, and grow up to become middle-aged Jamaican women. In Manhattan, when an oldest child turns 12, entire families disappear overnight.

If we are really going to abandon the idea of having a secure cruise ship offshore, we've got to reduce Republican delegates' vulnerability by giving them the information and tools they will need to camouflage themselves as New York liberals. I am willing to work up an instructional video — "How to Be Ruth Messinger in 12 Easy Steps" — but in the meantime we need to send out a fact sheet.

We need to tell prospective G.O.P. delegates what sort of clothing they cannot wear in New York: pastels, pleated pants, khakis, Docksiders and tassels. If a Republican was seen walking down Riverside Drive wearing his normal outfit — tasseled loafers, no socks, green pants, a festive plaid sports jacket and a faded Hawaiian Tommy Bahama shirt — some New Yorker would come up and ask him if he could bring Paris Hilton out to his home for a reality series.

We also need to tell them what they will need to blend in: dark, rumpled clothing, frayed shopping bags from the Strand, logo-less sweatshirts, Yasir Arafat-style facial hair and those black rectangular glasses that make everybody look like a Dutch architect.

We're going to have to give them phrases they can use in case they are called upon to make elevator small talk. We have to give them examples of sentiments they should avoid ("You're Jewish? Oh, I love your Ariel Sharon!"), and examples of phrases they should use ("Nice weather we're having. Too bad about the climate of McCarthyism settling over the land.")

I don't like thinking about Orrin Hatch in a do-rag any more than you do, but this problem is going to require creative thinking. Liberalism doesn't just happen. It is a product of a certain environment. I'm afraid if our stouthearted Republicans find themselves in New York, with its insufficient closet space and inadequate kitchen counters, they may start turning liberal themselves.

They may start caring about what happens inside Condé Nast, taking Quentin Tarantino seriously, practicing therapeutic yoga and fantasizing about having Al Franken's baby.

What will you do then, when you call up your major donors and they ask you to phone back after "West Wing" is over? Then you'll rue the day you canceled that cruise ship idea. But then it'll be too late. By the summer of 2008 we'll be holding the G.O.P. convention in Bridgehampton.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; US: New York
KEYWORDS: brooks; davidbrooks; effeminate; nonconservative; nyc; rncconvention; snob
I've said this many times, Brooks is an effeminate, elitist snob and now he's a scumbag to boot. Anyone who sides with this metrosexual should consider switching parties and worldview.
1 posted on 12/06/2003 4:43:41 AM PST by Archangelsk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
Chill out! This is a hilarious satirical piece that attacks New Yorkers, not repubs.
2 posted on 12/06/2003 5:17:53 AM PST by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WL-law
Oh, you mean the same metropolitan New Yorkers who lost 3,000 of their fathers, mothers, sons, daughters, husbands and wives on 911? Those New Yorkers? Sometimes, the short memories of FReepers astounds me.

Eff Brooks.

3 posted on 12/06/2003 5:28:05 AM PST by Archangelsk (11 days and counting to the centenial anniversary. Go Orville! Go Wilbur!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
I don't know anything about Brooks--I don't even know who he is--but this is a clever satire.
4 posted on 12/06/2003 5:35:31 AM PST by Savage Beast (Has The Fall of California been averted--or merely postponed???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
Wow! This guy has nailed just how idiotic the left really is.

Pity that he obviously still thinks it's an honor to be part of that group.

5 posted on 12/06/2003 5:39:11 AM PST by New Horizon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
I don't know much about him, but he sure writes like a b--ch.
6 posted on 12/06/2003 5:41:05 AM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace (I'm from the government and I'm here to help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
Oh, you mean the same metropolitan New Yorkers who lost 3,000 of their fathers, mothers, sons, daughters, husbands and wives on 911? Those New Yorkers? Sometimes, the short memories of FReepers astounds me.

What's your point? New York will vote OVERWHELMINGLY for Dean or whoever the dem nominee is -- or do you doubt that for even a second?

So they REMAIN Dems, "even" after 9/11.

7 posted on 12/06/2003 5:57:00 AM PST by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
I do not understand what possessed Karl Rove to put the Pubbies in NYC for the convention.
Was if because of 9/11? Rove is supposed to be smart enough to know that the publics memory is not that long.
We would have been much better off in a marginally Republican state like Florida, especially if we had held the convention in Orlando rather than Miami.

The only possible reason for NYC is to help prepare to run Giulianni in '08 since he will be the only charismatic Republican we have to run against Hitlery.

So9

8 posted on 12/06/2003 6:01:18 AM PST by Servant of the 9 (A Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
Brooks has rather impeccable conservative credentials, iirc, coming from the Weekly Standard. One of their featured writers. (or was it NRO). I was shocked that the NY Times wanted him, but he's doing what he's supposed to do for that rag, present a conservative view.
9 posted on 12/06/2003 7:31:40 AM PST by chiller (could be wrong, but doubt it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WL-law
I am a new yorker and a conservative, I see no need to attack my city or portray the people around me as some unkempt uncoutch ghetto lefty's in such a collective fashion. This kind of elitism is what I have grown to loathe. This is despicable.
10 posted on 12/06/2003 7:43:10 AM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
I thought that the ship was a bad idea, let's spend our GOP big bucks in the city.
11 posted on 12/06/2003 8:46:00 AM PST by Mike Darancette (Proud member - Neoconservative Power Vortex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
I am a new yorker and a conservative, I see no need to attack my city or portray the people around me as some unkempt uncoutch ghetto lefty's in such a collective fashion. This kind of elitism is what I have grown to loathe. This is despicable.

Oh, come ON! Get a grip and lighten up!

Conservative New Yorkers (at least on the Upper East Side) are saying all the time that they are living in a sea of liberal culture-swamp, that they have to use 'code' to identify each other at parties, etc.

So what Brooks asserts is GENERALLY true. And comedy DEPENDS on noticing generalizations.

12 posted on 12/06/2003 1:59:49 PM PST by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: chiller
I'm glad to hear that because the article was very good satire and well written. Maybe Brooks can save those yokels at the New York Times from themselves.
13 posted on 12/06/2003 3:45:41 PM PST by Savage Beast (I see stupid people. They don't know they're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson