Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obscure GOP rivals challenge Bush
Seattle Times ^ | Sunday, November 30, 2003 | Stephanie Simon

Posted on 11/30/2003 3:05:21 PM PST by bipartisan

ST. LOUIS — Blake Ashby seems just a bit anxious. "I have nothing but respect for the president," he declares in his standard opening line. He follows it up by announcing, with all due respect, that he's running for George W. Bush's job. The respect is important because Ashby, 39, a Missouri entrepreneur, has been a committed navy-suit-and-red-tie Republican since he first studied GOP values during a civics class in his sophomore year of high school. He wouldn't want voters to think he's down on the president.

He just happens to believe he could do a better job. And he's willing to put his money on the line to try to prove it.

Ashby is one of 13 Republicans challenging Bush in New Hampshire's primary Jan. 27, the first balloting of the presidential election season. Other candidates include Bill Wyatt, who owns a T-shirt store in Los Angeles; John Donald Rigazio, who recently switched parties in a rage after the Democrats kept him off their ballot; and Millie Howard, who avoids the nuisance of updating her Web site for each of her campaigns by titling the introduction "Millie Howard for President USA 1992 and Beyond."

The field, in short, sounds an awful lot like the crowd that mesmerized — or mortified — Californians in their recent gubernatorial recall election.

Why are they running? "Some of it is just to be able to say you ran for president. Some of it is vanity. Some is mental instability," said Andy Smith, a political-science professor at the University of New Hampshire.

Some, too, is admirable dedication to a lonely cause.

Howard wants to abolish the IRS. Rigazio aims to pull the United States out of the World Trade Organization. Wyatt has built his campaign around the all-capital-letters rallying cry: "NO NEW WARS!" Each cared enough to pay a $1,000 filing fee in the hope of using their candidacies to call attention to their agendas.

Few of the candidates — Wyatt is a notable exception — express anger at Bush or his policies. Don't expect a lot of mudslinging from these folks; the race as they see it is all about them, not the man they would like to replace.

"There are a lot of reporters running around the state, so maybe (these candidates) get more attention here than they would anywhere else," said Linda Fowler, a professor of government at Dartmouth University.

The urge to run seems timeless and somehow above the political fray, Fowler noted. No matter who is in the White House — or who leads the opposition — at least a dozen fringe candidates from each party clog the New Hampshire ballot every four years. None receives more than 100 or so votes — "and that would be a generous estimate," Fowler said.

Bush, who expects to build a re-election war chest of up to $200 million, has not acknowledged his 13 challengers. His campaign declined to comment.

Local GOP officials for the most part act as if the president were running unopposed; some states have canceled their Republican primary to save money.

"It's like being invisible," Wyatt complained. "There are not going to be any forums in which George Bush even recognizes that anyone else is running."

Despite that embittering fact, Wyatt, 43, a father of three, plans to spend about $20,000 on his anti-war candidacy. Asked what his wife thought of his plan, he laughed: "Let's just say I like her honesty. She thinks it's stupid." He has given away hundreds of free T-shirts and miniature Wyatt-for-president lawn signs. He's flown across the country to camp out in front of mainstream campaign events, introducing himself to anyone who will listen.

"I never served in the military, but I have run for office a lot and have stood up for a lot of causes. And to me, that's serving the country, too," he said. Plus, he said, his civic activism is teaching his kids "not to be afraid to participate."

Acknowledging that he's "not 100 percent up on most issues," Wyatt has invited voters to write his Web site at www.billwyatt.org with suggestions on how to run the country. "Maybe 10 have written in so far," he said. "It's not hugely popular now, but I hope the momentum will build."

From his home base in St. Louis, Ashby also is counting on momentum as he tries to distinguish himself from his opponents — a couple of whom, he suggests, are only "looking for dates."

His campaign is more organized than most; he has two press secretaries and a team of Web gurus helping him get his message out online, at www.ashby2004.com. He won't say how much money he's willing to commit, but he plans to spend three weeks shaking hands with voters in New Hampshire and aims to put his name on the ballot in more than a dozen other states. He even hints that his budget might allow TV ads. Ashby says he's running because the spiking deficits and "bloated budgets" of the Bush administration outrage him. He says he can't believe a Republican president would support huge new entitlements such as expanded farm subsidies and a prescription-drug benefit for Medicare even as the national debt soars.

Ashby hopes to gain enough force as a protest candidate to start steering the GOP back toward what he calls its founding principles of "limited government and fiscal restraint."

"I want people to think, 'What would happen if a bunch of us did vote for this guy? We could send a message to the Republican Party. We could express frustration with current policies,' " Ashby said.

"But if I should lose in the primaries," he said, ever respectful, "I will certainly vote for the president."


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ashby; buhbye; duh; dusucks; election; electionpresident; ozone; primary; republican; troll; zot
Seems like this Ashby fellow is running on a fiscal conservative policy.
1 posted on 11/30/2003 3:05:22 PM PST by bipartisan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bipartisan; Admin Moderator
This guy seems suspicious. I read the zotted post from yesterday. Is this the same guy?
2 posted on 11/30/2003 3:09:13 PM PST by WinOne4TheGipper (Bush/Cheney 04- 61% of the vote. Count on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bipartisan
Bipartisan
Since Nov. 30, 2003
Going. Going. Gone.
3 posted on 11/30/2003 3:19:43 PM PST by WinOne4TheGipper (Bush/Cheney 04- 61% of the vote. Count on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightcoast; South40
Returning troll zot ping!
4 posted on 11/30/2003 3:29:13 PM PST by WinOne4TheGipper (Bush/Cheney 04- 61% of the vote. Count on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: will1776
lol! Good riddance.
5 posted on 11/30/2003 3:30:40 PM PST by South40 (My vote helped defeat cruz bustamante; did yours?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bipartisan
The field, in short, sounds an awful lot like the crowd that mesmerized — or mortified — Californians in their recent gubernatorial recall election.

Whatchu ben smokun Steffy?

6 posted on 11/30/2003 3:30:59 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (Chilling Effect-1, Global Warming-0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: will1776
Well, I won't say whether or not Bipartisan should go. But if this silly article is in the Seattle Times, it's a legitimate post. It shows how truly desperate they are.

Notice, too, that they manage to focus on the ONLY candidate whom they say is actually angry at Bush. I wonder why?
7 posted on 11/30/2003 3:59:11 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I gotta agree with one of his statements though. Having the gov't. pay for senior's prescription drugs is STUPID! I don't care if people are old or not, if we as a country can't pay for stuff, why can the government afford it?? Same people !
I don't want to pay for Bill Gates' drugs when he gets old.
SM
8 posted on 11/30/2003 4:08:02 PM PST by Senormechanico ("Face piles of trials with smiles...it riles them to believe that you perceive the web they weave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Senormechanico
My understanding is that even critics of the bill, such as Chuck Hagel, have praised it for having means-testing. There is a cutoff based on how much income one makes, so we will not be paying for medicine for wealthy seniors.
9 posted on 11/30/2003 4:44:35 PM PST by jagrmeister (-I'm not a conservative. I don't seek to conserve, I seek to reform.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bipartisan
Watch as I perform a magic trick with your handle!
I'll saw it in half and magically..
ooops...
I haven't been able to get it right yet.
10 posted on 11/30/2003 5:42:37 PM PST by Darksheare (Even as we speak, my 100,000 killer wombat army marches forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Oddly, our poster of last night, Republican Challenger (nee: John Buchanan), didn't make the Seattle Times cut.

Tsk, tsk. And him a "journalist", too...

11 posted on 11/30/2003 5:54:34 PM PST by okie01 (www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bipartisan
OK, in keeping with my tendency to make overly serious replies to humorous threads (ZOTS), I think it's interesting looking for conservative alternatives to Bush.

My quandry is I trust only Bush to fight the war on terrorism, but Bush has fiscal constraint at all.

The $40b for AIDS in Africa OK, the Kennedy education bill, OK. Even the Dept. of Homeland Security I could deal with.

But this Medicare bill pushed me over the edge. Nowhere in any of the news articles did I find details about how we're supposed to *pay* for this behemoth.

If a candidate ran who was a limited government conservative and strong on the WOT, he/she would have my vote.


12 posted on 11/30/2003 5:58:59 PM PST by mikenola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01
With his Walter Mittyish self delusion about his own capacities, he probably is used to missing the cut. American folklore celebrates those who go for the gold, but the dirty little secret is that those that do that succeed, had a fighting chance of succeeding, due often to hard work in positioning themselves. This guy is just wrapped in the pyschotic cocoon of hubris he has constructed for himself.
13 posted on 11/30/2003 6:03:01 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Torie
"This guy is just wrapped in the pyschotic cocoon of hubris he has constructed for himself."

The guy bragged about building a Los Angeles ad agency -- a $3 million business.

I was in the ad business...and a $3 million business is (and was) peanuts. That's billings -- total client expenditures. The "business" itself is based on the commission income. Which, at the customary 15%, makes it a $450K business. And that's not a large agency, even in Shreveport.

The guy's a small-time grifter, with a big-time ego. And if it hadn't been for the "big corporations" and the "ol' boy network", he'd have made it big, yada, yada, yada...

We all know the type, don't we?

14 posted on 11/30/2003 6:38:55 PM PST by okie01 (www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson