YOO-HOO Ds! (espec. Howard and Susan): How to use MEMOGATE to take your party back. . .

THE MEMO | 11-05-03 | Mia T

[Mia T]

YOO-HOO Ds! (espec. Howard & Susan)
How to use MEMOGATE to take your party back. . .

 

by Mia T, 11-05-03

EMOGATE INDIRECTION: Rockefeller and Daschle are decoys, more cutout than cutthroat, less sockdolager than sock-puppet. Rockefeller's too genteel; Daschle's too "concerned." Neither, frankly, has the requisite utter disregard for life. And perhaps most important, (insofar as their decoy role is concerned), both are too bland to inspire sufficient opposition ire.

No. Memogate bears the indelible mark of clinton; that is, hillary, and by association, bill.

hillary talks: On White House Coverups

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org
fiendsofhillary.blogspot.com
fiendsofhillary.us
fiendsofhillary.org
fraudsofhillary.com

 

MEMOGATE MEANS, MOTIVE, OPPORTUNITY...

The scheme is more manifesto than memo; it is ludicrous to think that it could have been concocted by anyone other than the clintons. The clintons control the Democratic Party, have impressive presidential-coup field experience (on both ends, spanning three decades), and are beginning to understand that, for reasons ranging from Rudy to rape, they don't have forever to make their move. Hence, the scheme... and the memo.

TREASON OR ITS FIRST COUSIN

If what has happened here is not treason, it is its first cousin. The ones responsible - be they staff or elected or both - should be dealt with quickly and severely sending a lesson to all that this kind of action will not be tolerated, ignored or excused. --Sen. Zell Miller, D-Ga.

If the Ds really want their party back, they should make their move now. Someone out there can finger the clintons. He should do it. Now.

He mustn't delude himself into imagining that the Invertebrate Party will nail her. That will never happen. (Which, by the way, will cost the GOP votes. We will never again tolerate a party that puts its own power above national security... and that is precisely what the GOP will be doing if it allows a clinton (once again) to remain in office. (Didn't you guys learn ANYTHING from 911???))

P.S. Note the increase in defensive, diversionary dem mudslinging since the memo surfaced, especially by hillary's Boy in Harlem. Rangel's been on the tube 24/7 calling for Rummy's resignation. That should tell you something about hillary's vulnerability...

[Mia T]

Raw Data: Dem Memo on Politicizing Intelligence
Fox News ^ | 11-5-03 | Fox News

Wednesday, November 05, 2003

Following is the text of a memo written by a Democrat on the staff of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence that suggests how to make the greatest gain off of intelligence data leading to the war against Iraq. The memo was obtained by Fox News.

Transcript of a memo written by a Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee staff suggesting how to make the greatest gain off of intelligence data leading to the war against Iraq.

We have carefully reviewed our options under the rules and believe we have identified the best approach. Our plan is as follows:

1) Pull the majority along as far as we can on issues that may lead to major new disclosures regarding improper or questionable conduct by administration officials. We are having some success in that regard. For example, in addition to the president's State of the Union speech, the chairman has agreed to look at the activities of the Office of the Secretary of Defense as well as Secretary Bolton's office at the State Department. The fact that the chairman supports our investigations into these offices and co-signs our requests for information is helpful and potentially crucial. We don't know what we will find but our prospects for getting the access we seek is far greater when we have the backing of the majority. (Note: we can verbally mention some of the intriguing leads we are pursuing.)

2) Assiduously prepare Democratic "additional views" to attach to any interim or final reports the committee may release. Committee rules provide this opportunity and we intend to take full advantage of it. In that regard, we have already compiled all the public statements on Iraq made by senior administration officials. We will identify the most exaggerated claims and contrast them with the intelligence estimates that have since been declassified. Our additional views will also, among other things, castigate the majority for seeking to limit the scope of the inquiry. The Democrats will then be in a strong position to reopen the question of establishing an independent commission (i.e. the Corzine amendment).

3) Prepare to launch an independent investigation when it becomes clear we have exhausted the opportunity to usefully collaborate with the majority. We can pull the trigger on an independent investigation at any time-- but we can only do so once. The best time to do so will probably be next year either:

A) After we have already released our additional views on an interim report -- thereby providing as many as three opportunities to make our case to the public: 1) additional views on the interim report; 2) announcement of our independent investigation; and 3) additional views on the final investigation; or

B) Once we identify solid leads the majority does not want to pursue. We could attract more coverage and have greater credibility in that context than one in which we simply launch an independent investigation based on principled but vague notions regarding the "use" of intelligence.

In the meantime, even without a specifically authorized independent investigation, we continue to act independently when we encounter foot-dragging on the part of the majority. For example, the FBI Niger investigation was done solely at the request of the vice chairman; we have independently submitted written questions to DoD; and we are preparing further independent requests for information.

Summary

Intelligence issues are clearly secondary to the public's concern regarding the insurgency in Iraq. Yet, we have an important role to play in the revealing the misleading -- if not flagrantly dishonest methods and motives -- of the senior administration officials who made the case for a unilateral, preemptive war. The approach outline above seems to offer the best prospect for exposing the administration's dubious motives and methods.

[NYpeanut]

Daschle is deeply saddened that this memo got into the wrong hands.

[Mia T]

the clintons in treason's shadow _PING

Lib Author Regrets Voting (TWICE!) for clinton
"Sickened" by clinton's Failure to Protect America from Terrorism

MUST-READ BOOK FOR DEMOCRATS:
How clintons' Failures Unleashed Global Terror

The Man Who Warned America
(Why a Rapist is Not a Fit President)

UDAY: "The end is near… this time I think the… Americans are serious, Bush is not like Clinton."

(Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?)
 Q ERTY6_{It won't s-p-i-n} ^{utter failure}_BUMP

[mass55th]

That memo sounds just like a page out of the Al Qeyda handbook.

[bullseye1911]

1) Pull the majority along as far as we can on issues that may lead to major new disclosures regarding improper or questionable conduct by administration officials. We are having some success in that regard. For example, in addition to the president's State of the Union speech, the chairman has agreed to look at the activities of the Office of the Secretary of Defense as well as Secretary Bolton's office at the State Department. The fact that the chairman supports our investigations into these offices and co-signs our requests for information is helpful and potentially crucial. We don't know what we will find but our prospects for getting the access we seek is far greater when we have the backing of the majority. (Note: we can verbally mention some of the intriguing leads we are pursuing.)

Frist, are you listening? Grow some cajones, Nancy-boy! This ain't powder-puff!

[Mia T]

hillary talks: On White House Intimidation^PING
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

[Mia T]

Politesse and pusillanimity are luxuries of a pre-911 world. the GOP had better wake up, before it's too late....

[bmwcyle]

Good Morning Bump

[MeekOneGOP]

Wow !! Look at all those KEYWORDS !! lol !! ...

If what has happened here is not treason, it is its first cousin. The ones responsible - be they staff or elected or both - should be dealt with quickly and severely sending a lesson to all that this kind of action will not be tolerated, ignored or excused. --Sen. Zell Miller, D-Ga.

One of my first attempts at photoshopping. i need to try it again, i think ...

[cardinal4]

Daschle is deeply saddened that this memo got into the wrong hands

Why should he be? The GOP will cave, if the disinterested staffers I talked to this morning are any indication of GOP resolve..

[pawdoggie]

In that regard, we have already compiled all the public statements on Iraq made by senior administration officials...Intelligence issues are clearly secondary to the public's concern regarding the insurgency in Iraq. Yet, we have an important role to play in the revealing the misleading -- if not flagrantly dishonest methods and motives -- of the senior administration officials who made the case for a unilateral, preemptive war.

Note the first citation above. In the big "exclusive" ABC's Brian Ross is currently pimping (i.e. that the Bush Administration "ignored" a "peace feeler" from some Lebanese smuggler with dual American citizenship), ABC juxtaposes the story of the "peace feeler" against a Rumsfeld statement that the US had "exhausted every opportunity for peace". Of course, both the first and second citation clearly reveal that the Democrat members of the Intel Committee are proceeding from the foregone conclusion (or hope) that "Bush lied" about the intelligence on Iraq, and that they are simply looking for any information (no matter how specious) to support their conclusion. That's why I believe that the "Pentagon memos" that ABC said they possess (which supposedly show that the "feeler" from the smuggler was presumably passed up the DoD chain), came from the Democrats on the Senate Intelligence Committee.

[Helms]

The Clinton controlled Democratic Party is a Matrix of lies, distortion, dissembling and dishonesty.

[Mia T]

Precisely. Note the timing...

How much longer are the Ds going to tolerate the clintons? Surely, there must be multiple coups in the works.

With Memogate, the Ds are one Deep Throat away from a clinton-free par-tee...

[MamaLucci]

Good post, Mia T.
This memo definitely reeks of hillary!

[CyberAnt]

LOL! The FOX morning guys were saying that Rockerfeller's protestations of the memo being a draft which was probably taken out of a waste basket .. was just to cover up his guilt. I believe Shakespeare said, "thou protesteth too much".

As for a repub taking the memo out of a wastebasket, that is in and of itself ludicrous. Having been to the congressional offices myself, NO REPUB WOULD BE ALLOWED INSIDE A DEM'S OFFICE and be allowed to pilfer anybody's waste basket. Durbin's charge is stupid!

[Mia T]

If the dems are smart, they will seize this opportunity and turn the witch in.

[backhoe]

Cross-linking:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1015980/posts

MemoGate- sedition, slander-- or something worse?
Various FR links | 11-06-03 | The Heavy Equipment Guy

[Mia T]

The scheme is more manifesto than memo; it is ludicrous to think that it could have been concocted by anyone other than the clintons. The clintons control the Democratic Party, have impressive presidential-coup field experience (on both ends, spanning three decades), and are beginning to understand that, for reasons ranging from Rudy to rape, they don't have forever to make their move. Hence, the scheme... and the memo....

If the Ds really want their party back, they should make their move now. Someone out there can finger the clintons. He should do it. Now.

YOO-HOO Ds! (espec. Howard & Susan)
How to use MEMOGATE to take your party back. . .

 

A former member of the Clinton administration is being linked to a bombshell Senate Intelligence Committee memo outlining a strategy to use information gathered by the committee to help drive President Bush from office in 2004.

In an editorial Friday, the Wall Street Journal reports:

"[Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Jay Rockefeller, D-WV] refuses to denounce the memo, which he says was unauthorized and written by staffers. If that's the case, at the very least, some heads ought to roll. A good place to start would be minority staffer Christopher Mellon, who serves as deputy assistant secretary of defense for intelligence in the Clinton administration."

One of Mellon's former bosses, former first lady Hillary Clinton, has been sharply critical of the Bush administration's policy in Iraq. Last week she accused the White House of trying cover-up battlefield casualties and said Bush's decision to invade Iraq was "the antithesis of the rule of law."

The Journal recommended that, until those responsible for Democrats' decision to politicize intelligence are fired, the Intelligence Committee should be "shut down, cleaned out and reconstituted later, preferably after the next election."

Clinton Appointee Linked to Bombshell Anti-Bush Intel Memo
NewsMax.com ^ | 11/07/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

[firewalk]

Good morning
bttt