Posted on 11/05/2003 11:23:58 PM PST by kattracks
NEW YORK (AP) - In protesting "The Reagans," the miniseries that CBS decided to pull this week, supporters of the former president were defending not just a man, or a politician, but his principles. "This was a left-wing smear of one of the nation's most beloved presidents and CBS got caught," says Brent Bozell, founder of the conservative Media Research Center, which had asked advertisers to consider boycotting the film.All modern presidents have their advocates, but Ronald Reagan's legacy is guarded with an intensity not seen among supporters of Jimmy Carter or Gerald Ford. For many, Reagan personifies the conservative movement, and attacks against him are regarded as attacks on what he stands for - low taxes, a large military, traditional social values.
"You see this sort of cultural war that began in the '60s being carried out two generations later with Reagan ... becoming the symbol of what is good or what is not good," says biographer Lou Cannon, whose new book, "Governor Reagan," covers Reagan's two terms as governor of California.
CBS said Tuesday it will not air "The Reagans," handing it off to the Showtime cable network, which is owned - like CBS - by Viacom. Conservatives, including a son of the former president, had charged that the miniseries depicted Reagan as uncaring about AIDS and passive about his job. Few have seen the completed program.
While CBS said it was not responding to political pressure, critics said that was exactly the case, and worried about pre-emptive strikes on future work. Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., said CBS' decision "smells of intimidation to me."
Reagan was once his own best defender, the "Great Communicator" who so effectively presented his views to a mass audience. But since announcing in 1994 that he had Alzheimer's disease, he has rarely appeared in public.
Instead, others speak on his behalf. He is revered among contemporary Republicans, and a wave of sympathetic books has come out over the past few years, including Dinesh D'Souza's "Ronald Reagan: How an Ordinary Man Became an Extraordinary Leader" and Peggy Noonan's "When Character Was King," the title a dig at President Clinton.
Reagan's own words have been featured in "I Love You, Ronnie," consisting of letters to his wife, Nancy, and in "Reagan, In His Own Hand: The Writings of Ronald Reagan That Reveal His Revolutionary Vision for America."
"There's a very real campaign going on, and some of these books are designed to address issues about his image," says Richard Reeves, who has written biographies of Richard Nixon and John F. Kennedy and is now working on a Reagan book.
"For instance, one of the criticisms of Reagan has been about his intelligence, that he wasn't the fastest on the draw. So the book of his speeches is a response to that."
Every president's reputation has changed over time and legacies are often debated. Recent books have defended William McKinley, Ulysses S. Grant and Rutherford B. Hayes, none of whom is regarded as a major president. Even Warren G. Harding, often at the bottom of historians' polls, will be the subject of a sympathetic biography coming out next year, written by former Nixon aide John W. Dean.
Contemporary politics dictate the urgency of the debate over a president's standing. While David McCullough's Pulitzer Prize-winning biography of John Adams greatly helped the image of the second president, it had little effect on current affairs. But with a conservative president, George Bush, in office, anything said about Reagan could reflect on Bush.
"If your philosophy is to have tax cuts on a huge scale, as Bush's is, then you're going be concerned that the tax cutting approach isn't discredited. And that's tied in with perceptions of Reagan," says historian Kevin Phillips, whose books include "The Emerging Republican Majority" and "The Politics of Rich and Poor."
"I think all of this debate reflects what's going in the United States right now. We're at a stage when an awful lot is hanging in the balance and nothing is working out very well. So you end up fighting over history, over who did what."
Every president's reputation has changed over time and legacies are often debated. Recent books have defended William McKinley, Ulysses S. Grant and Rutherford B. Hayes, none of whom is regarded as a major president. Even Warren G. Harding, often at the bottom of historians' polls, will be the subject of a sympathetic biography coming out next year, written by former Nixon aide John W. Dean.
After writing a fairly even handed piece, the author tosses in this paragraph after talking about sympathetic books for Reagan, implying that Reagan belongs in this same group of bottom-of-the-barrel presidents.
-PJ
Could be. I believe the statistic is 85% of reporters are Dims.
For all practical purposes, it can be rounded off to "nine out of ten" fall over on the Left:
| Professor's Study Shows Liberal Bias in News Media | ||||||
|
Great Debate#9 Break up Microsoft?...Then how about the media "Big Six"? [ ... -Poll confirms Ivy League liberal tilt--
A poll by the Center for the Study of Social and Political Change in 1992, eighty-three percent of film and television writers, directors and producers voted for Bill Clinton. Eighty-three percent. The vote that Clinton received in the country at large, forty-three percent.
|
||||||
Don't think they aren't trying. It's probably fewer than 41, too. They started with Bush Sr. with "It's the economy, stupid!" when the economy was just starting to turn around anyway. Then the went after Jefferson and his "love child" in order to diminish the impact of Clinton's affairs. JFK was a hero of Clinton's, but they savaged JFK's press secretary Pierre Salinger when he dared to dispute the TWA 800 "findings." Now they're rewriting Reagan's biography.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.