Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/05/2003 6:21:33 PM PST by Brian S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
To: Brian S
...and the liberals will try to use this how..?
2 posted on 11/05/2003 6:22:32 PM PST by GeronL (Visit www.geocities.com/geronl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S

Bummer.... ;)
3 posted on 11/05/2003 6:22:59 PM PST by SouthernFreebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
Perle's 15 minutes of fame are up. he needs to go away now.
4 posted on 11/05/2003 6:25:05 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
...the Pentagon received a secret message from a Lebanese-American businessman: Saddam Hussein wanted to make a deal.

I don't know who this "Lebanese-American businessman" is...but I know he now understands we do not negotiate with terrorists.

I hope he passes this message on....

5 posted on 11/05/2003 6:25:53 PM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
If this is true, Saddam could have made his case in any liberal American newspaper or the odious UN. Any one of them would have jumped at the chance to step in front of our tanks to be the hero.
6 posted on 11/05/2003 6:27:39 PM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
Ah yes, another completely unverifiable "The War Could Have Been Avoided" story.

I'll put this tall tale in my 'Revisionist History' file, along with the story that the Japanese surrendered after the first atomic bomb, but the mean old bloodthirsty Americans just couldn't stop themselves from killing more Japanese babies. Gag.

7 posted on 11/05/2003 6:29:58 PM PST by Skwidd (Fire Controlman First Class Extraordinaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
Oh sure, the whole, "Let's meet in Beirut to talk it over" routine. Right.
8 posted on 11/05/2003 6:30:44 PM PST by Trust but Verify (Will work for W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
I remember this was reported, and ignored for its transparency, as it happened.

Ho hum.

NYT: this all ya got?

9 posted on 11/05/2003 6:30:54 PM PST by moodyskeptic (weekend warrior in the culture war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
They also offered to hand over a man accused of being involved in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing who was being held in Baghdad.

Impossible. There were no terrorists in Iraq, let alone any who were connected to the bombing attempts on the WTC. The left has told us this repeatedly.

10 posted on 11/05/2003 6:30:58 PM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
"Mr. Hage said that when he told Mr. Obeidi that the United States seemed adamant about forcing Saddam Hussein to give up power, Mr. Obeidi bristled, saying that would be capitulation. But later, Mr. Hage recounted, Mr. Obeidi said that Iraq could agree to hold elections within the next two years."

ROFLMAO, Mr. Obeide sounds more like Baghdad Bob.

This is such garbage that I'm surprised it's in print. I don't doubt the story at all, it worked very well for them for through the 1990's to the "Peace at any price" crowd. But after 9/11 the bullsh*t games were over.

If the Liberals think this is some kind of big story, they need to take the Crack Pipe out of their mouth

12 posted on 11/05/2003 6:33:02 PM PST by MJY1288 (This is your tagline "Bush/Cheney04", this is your tagline on drugs "AnyOtherChoice/04")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
Mr. Perle said he found it "puzzling" that the Iraqis would use such a complicated series of contacts to communicate "a quite astonishing proposal" to the Bush administration. But former American intelligence officials with extensive experience in the Middle East say that many Arab leaders like Mr. Hussein have traditionally placed a high value on back channels communications, failing to understand that such informal arrangements are considered suspect in Washington.

Of course if Mr. Hussein really wanted to come clean he could have done so when Dan Rather came to visit.

13 posted on 11/05/2003 6:33:26 PM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
No meetings took place, and the invasion began on March 20. Mr. Hage, speaking in Beirut, wonders what might have happened if the Americans had pursued the back channel to Baghdad. "At least they could have talked to them," he said.

blah blah blah. saddam knew the risks. He brought his ticket. He knew what he was getting into. I say, let him crash!


17 posted on 11/05/2003 6:37:41 PM PST by new cruelty (Okay boys, lets get some pictures.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
This reads like the script for another Mini Series, that CBS may be considering.
18 posted on 11/05/2003 6:38:13 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (If you seen yourself as other people do, you'd laugh too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
Even if this guy is telling the truth, I doubt it was Saddam himself that wanted to broker peace. He could have easily done so secretly through more diplomatic channels. He had a U.N. ambassador in New York.

It sounds more like some Saddam official had a brief moment of clarity and tried to stop the war on his own.
20 posted on 11/05/2003 6:40:24 PM PST by Toskrin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
And we know how Saddam Hussein is (was) a man of his word.
22 posted on 11/05/2003 6:42:18 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
Uh...Saddam did hold elections, remember? Got purt near 99.9% of the votes, too. Popular fellow.
23 posted on 11/05/2003 6:42:25 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
Calling for the BS meter.
25 posted on 11/05/2003 6:43:15 PM PST by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
Mr. Perle said he found it "puzzling" that the Iraqis would use such a complicated series of contacts to communicate "a quite astonishing proposal" to the Bush administration.

Of course he found it "puzzling". I don't believe those people are capable of doing anything straightforwardly.

26 posted on 11/05/2003 6:43:34 PM PST by wimpycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
This whole thing sounds like what Schellenberg pulled off right before WW2, he captured an English agent and a Belgian. Claimed the Germans wanted to prevent a war.
29 posted on 11/05/2003 6:51:14 PM PST by sticker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
Iraq made tens, hundreds of "appeals."

France said no to enforcement.
30 posted on 11/05/2003 6:52:30 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson