Skip to comments.
Smucker sued over '100 percent' fruit label
CNN ^
| 10/20/2003
Posted on 10/21/2003 12:23:49 PM PDT by Born Conservative
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:03:17 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) --A California woman with a "sensitive palate" has filed a proposed class-action lawsuit against the J.M. Smucker Co. claiming that its familiar label is misleading since its spreadable jam is less than half fruit.
The case was filed last week in Los Angeles Superior Court on behalf of anyone who bought the Smucker premium brand in the past four years.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 10000nunsandorphans; grapesofwrath; smuckers; withanamelikesmucker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
To: Born Conservative
41
posted on
10/21/2003 12:59:43 PM PDT
by
M. Peach
(eschew obsfucation)
To: Born Conservative
Smucker's is still the best.
100% fruit would likely be a bit hard to spread and acidic. IMHO
42
posted on
10/21/2003 12:59:53 PM PDT
by
Cold Heat
("It is easier for an ass to succeed in that trade than any other." [Samuel Clemens, on lawyers])
To: presidio9
Better yet she get laughed out of court and has to pay court costs!
To: Always Right
I'd like to give her the razzberry!
44
posted on
10/21/2003 1:01:56 PM PDT
by
JimVT
To: CSM
Liberals for a Food Free America. It's for the children.
45
posted on
10/21/2003 1:04:44 PM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Taglines are for the curious to read and the talented to write. Would someone write me one?)
To: Born Conservative
The premium jam also contains fruit syrup, lemon juice concentrate, fruit pectin, red grape juice concentrate and natural flavors, What part of the above is not "fruit"?
Smuckers should countersue, and include the guy's law school for imitating a place of higher education.
To: All
Isn't fruit syrup made with sugar? If they use sugar to make their fruit syrup then technically it is not 100%. We buy "spreadable fruit" to avoid the corn syrup that goes into "everything".
47
posted on
10/21/2003 1:05:44 PM PDT
by
okkev68
To: Born Conservative
Smuckers is 100% Fruit. That's F-R-U-I-T, as in apples, lemons, grapes, etc.
Bloody liberals, they can't read!
48
posted on
10/21/2003 1:07:02 PM PDT
by
HolgerDansk
(Vikings: The Original Amphibious Warriors)
To: Flurry
If it saves just one, it is worth it! Plus, it causes second hand food a clear danger to the children!
SAVE THE KIDS!
49
posted on
10/21/2003 1:07:26 PM PDT
by
CSM
(Congrats to Flurry and LE!)
To: Argh
Hope this gets jammed up in the court dockets.
It all boils down to greed.
The idea for a lawsuit never gelled until she read the research.
She'll need a better batch of lawyers to win this.
We should stop this from spreading.
To: Born Conservative
Tomorrow's headline today:
Schwebel & Schmuck Shyster Sigal Sue Smucker
To: January24th
BWWAAAAHAhahahaha, very nice, Miss Jan! Long time, etc. I hope she doesn't put them out of business, they make a seedless raspberry jam I really like!
52
posted on
10/21/2003 1:13:22 PM PDT
by
Argh
To: Born Conservative
This must be the same lady that caused the manufacturers of KY Jelly to place the warning "For external use only" on thier tubes.
To: Born Conservative
From an old SNL parody commercial: "If it's called Painful Rectal Itch, it HAS to be good!!"
To: Revolting cat!
I can't even say that one time real fast. LOL!
To: KellyAdmirer
"No wonder lawyers have such a bad reputation"
...Yep! It's mother smuckers like her who give it to them.
To: Born Conservative
This proves that we need tart reform...<p.And torte reform. I think Smuckers is owned by a French outfit. It is not allowed in my house.
To: Born Conservative
This why we should kill all the lawyers, as per Shakespeare.
58
posted on
10/21/2003 1:20:46 PM PDT
by
jslade
To: CSM
Second hand food is disgusting and dangerous. In addition to the toxins and carcinogens it is highly flamable and in a closed environment EXPLOSIVE. It most be stopped. The best way to stop second hand food is to ban food. If no one consumes food then second hand food will not be produced. Did you know that 100% of the people who consume food will die. Food was the cause of my grandfather's death at 90 years of age. My grandmother died a few months later from her own addiction to food and all those years of exposure to grandpa's second hand food. Food was so debilitating to grandpa that in his last few years he often said, "I'm so full I can barely bend wind". Then he'd smoke a cigarette and rip one or two. Lucky for he and grandma that he didn't blow the house up.
59
posted on
10/21/2003 1:22:12 PM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Taglines are for the curious to read and the talented to write. Would someone write me one?)
To: Conservative_Rob
"This must be the same lady that caused the manufacturers of KY Jelly to place the warning "For external use only" on thier tubes".
...What have you got against Kentucky jelly?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson