If this is genuine, the artist would have been an extinct human species that died out about 150,000 years ago.
Posted on 10/20/2003 9:58:38 AM PDT by yankeedame
Last Updated: Monday, 20 October, 2003, 11:11 GMT 12:11 UK
Ancient carved 'faces' found
By Dr David Whitehouse BBC News Online science editor
If this is genuine, the artist would have been an extinct human species that died out about 150,000 years ago.
Cliff face
Local inhabitants say that prehistoric human faces are nothing new to the region and point to a rock cliff that they believe has been sculpted. They call it the Face of Borzone.
In 2001, in a pile of rubble collected for use as building material, Pietro Gaietto, from the Museum of the Origins of Man, saw something unusual in one particular head-sized rock.
"If I had not spotted it, it would have been covered in concrete and put into a wall," he told BBC News Online
Pietro Gaietto says it shows two heads, facing outwards and joined at the neck. One of the faces is bearded; the other is beardless.
Conceptual thought
"It has a very expressive face," he says. "The beardless face has two eyes, a mouth and a wide nose."
The Face of Borzone
He says close inspection of the rock reveals that it has been carved and knocked into shape.
Gaietto believes the sculpture is 200,000 years old, and would have been used in rituals.
He says it would have been made by an extinct species of human called Homo erectus, of which there is evidence in the region.
Older still
Gaietto's claims are controversial because hominids such as Homo erectus are not thought to have been capable of the symbolic thought needed to create art.
The earliest examples of human artwork that scientists feel confident to describe as such are all less than 100,000 years old. The most notable items are probably the 70,000-year-old engraved ochre pieces found in the Blombos Cave of South Africa.
But there are items some researchers have claimed to be art that are even older than the faces of Borzonasca. The so-called Tan-Tan object unearthed in Morocco in 1999 is said to be a 400,000-year-old sculpted figurine.
Mainstream science, however, believes these items are not man-made at all. It argues the distinctive features have very probably been moulded by geological processes.
Proof positive that the lost Midlerites did, in fact, exist.
This is my opinion also. As an avid artifact and rock hunter sometimes rocks will naturally resemble something. Heck i even saw my ex-bosses face in the wood paneling once. But i used to party alot back then.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this ping list.
Why does every discovery have to be sacred or related to rituals? Why can't it just be that BillyBob had nothing better to do than carve a face into a rock?
Or the face on Mars.
lmao at #6!
"You know, if I were a single man, I might ask that hominid out. That's a good-looking hominid."
--Bubba erectus
Are you kidding! BillyBob would have been way too busy trying to discover Budlite!
Probably because almost everything we do is ritualistic.
Looks more like the rumored race of Timcurrities.
thank goodness for electricity and bic lighters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.