Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Long-Lost Near-Earth Asteroid Spotted
New Scientist ^ | 10-16-2003 | Jeff Hecht

Posted on 10/16/2003 10:39:44 AM PDT by blam

Long-lost near-Earth asteroid spotted

17:35 16 October 03

NewScientist.com news service

A large and potentially hazardous asteroid that went missing for almost 66 years ago was re-discovered by astronomers on Wednesday morning. The good news is that its next fly-by, on 4 November, will miss the Earth by a relatively comfortable seven million kilometres.

Asteroid 1937 UB, later dubbed Hermes, set a record for closest recorded approach to the Earth on 30 October 1937. The record lasted for 50 years. Hermes is one to two kilometres in diameter and would cause global devastation if it hit the planet.

So, given its near approach, observers in 1937 were extremely keen to characterise its orbit and assess whether future passes would target the Earth. But with only four days of observations, Hermes was lost soon after it passed by.

Its rediscovery was an accident. Brian Skiff, of the Lowell Observatory in Arizona, spotted an interesting bright object with the LONEOS telescope in the early hours of Wednesday morning. Recognising from its motion that it was close to the Earth, he alerted the Minor Planet Center at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

Tim Spahr was up before dawn on the US east coast checking asteroid reports for the Minor Planet Center, and posted an alert asking other astronomers to make confirming observations.

Track back

Before the Sun rose in California, Jim Young saw it and made independent observations at the Table Mountain Observatory that helped narrow down the orbit. With this data, Spahr and others were able to track down unrecognised observations of the asteroid dating back to 26 August.

Then Brian Marsden, at the Minor Planet Center, combined the observations and calculated an orbit close to that of the long-lost Hermes - and revealing the safe fly-by on 4 November. The new orbit does not match the original one perfectly, but gravitational perturbation caused by the asteroid's close approaches to Earth and Venus could account for the variation.

Marsden hopes astronomers can pin down the orbit better by making radar observations as the asteroid passes Earth. "I would be very surprised if it wasn't Hermes," Marsden told New Scientist.

Hermes has been on asteroid-hunters' wish list for a long time. "It's the traditional long-lost one that really came close," says Marsden, who calculated an orbit 1969.

Others had continued searching without success, although in 2001 Lutz Schmadel and Joachim Schubart of the University of Heidelberg predicted that October 2003 would be a good time to look.

Jeff Hecht


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: asteroid; earth; long; lost; minimoon; minimoons; quasisatellite; quasisatellites; spotted; toutatis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: blam
Caught you reading Scientific American.

Interesting that we got about three weeks notice on this one.
21 posted on 10/16/2003 10:55:33 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat

Preparing For The Big One

22 posted on 10/16/2003 10:56:08 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: blam
AAAH! THE ATMOSPHERE!!!
23 posted on 10/16/2003 10:57:04 AM PDT by Constitution Day (Vitiositas Aliquantulus Classis™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Lucifer's Hammer is about to strike.

BTW, is it related to the spotted owl?

24 posted on 10/16/2003 10:57:44 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Probably right. But I'm betting that includes a lot of people who haven't been born yet and won't include everybody who is alive today. We're going to find the secret to immortality sometime during the 21st Century, imho.
25 posted on 10/16/2003 10:58:26 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: js1138
"Caught you reading Scientific American. "

I was just discussing this subject with my son in Glendora last night. I couldn't remember where I read that. Thanks

26 posted on 10/16/2003 10:59:19 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Don't worry, it will burn up in the atmosphere and anything that hits Earth will be no bigger than a Chihuahua head.
27 posted on 10/16/2003 11:22:31 AM PDT by NYFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: blam
In the next 120 years, 6.3 billion humans will die.

Actually, that is an underestimate...several billion more who haven't even been born yet will have died by 2123.

28 posted on 10/16/2003 12:55:40 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blam
I wonder when it will make its next pass by earth? (maybe thats when we will all die)
29 posted on 10/16/2003 1:00:27 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass
>> ...women and chill'ren, gays hurt the most, news on A2..NYT :))

The correct NYT/Boston Globe headline is:

World to End Friday
Women, Minorities Disparately Impacted, Experts Say

30 posted on 10/16/2003 1:03:34 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Uday and Qusay and Idi-ay are ead-day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior
"Lucifer's Hammer is about to strike."

Hmmmm! Maybe I should get the olde surfboard out and waxed.

31 posted on 10/16/2003 2:18:43 PM PDT by SuperLuminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
..women and chill'ren, gays hurt the most, news on A2..NYT :))///The correct NYT/Boston Globe headline is: World to End Friday Women, Minorities Disparately Impacted, Experts Say

I defer to your porper grammar... :))

32 posted on 10/16/2003 6:27:09 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid,doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: blam
Couple of the gems of the story:

Recognising from its motion that it was close to the Earth, he alerted the Minor Planet Center at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. [picture this phone call in your mind]

. . . Lutz Schmadel and Joachim Schubart . . . predicted that October 2003 would be a good time to look.[picture these guys]


33 posted on 10/16/2003 6:34:41 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
The correct NYT/Boston Globe headline is: World to End Friday Women, Minorities Disparately Impacted, Experts Say

(HIT forehead) I defer to your proper use of standard English and grammar. :))

34 posted on 10/16/2003 6:35:58 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid,doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
No. It missed earth by "only" 500,000 miles in 1937.

That's just over 7 hours in Earth's orbit around the sun.

66 years ago

That's .082% margin of error in the calculations between observations.

35 posted on 10/16/2003 6:55:01 PM PDT by Phsstpok (often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam
Dang, gotta pay the taxes another year or so.
36 posted on 10/16/2003 7:04:31 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
Too bad he isn't on his way to deepspace.
37 posted on 10/16/2003 7:06:54 PM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Snagging one of this size and parking it in a Lagrange point would sure save some space station building dough...
38 posted on 10/16/2003 7:45:08 PM PDT by Axenolith (Hey, look at that little critter...Yaaaa! GET IT OFF! GET IT OFF!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
A lot of the ejecta would probably exceed lunar escape velocity and provide for a really cool meteor shower :)
39 posted on 10/16/2003 7:47:17 PM PDT by Axenolith (Yakboy made me put this tag here, I swear it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass
I defer to your proper use of standard English and grammar. :))

Actually, I was just reading the New York Times style book. It says right here on page 27 that any time there's a catastrophe, the subhead needs to contain one of a selection of similar lines to the one sited. They conveniently supply a list of experts who will reliably back up the disparate impact claims, most of who are Professors at Ivy League universities.

40 posted on 10/17/2003 6:23:55 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Uday and Qusay and Idi-ay are ead-day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson