Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wesley Clark's "Victory" In Kosovo
AIM ^ | October 6, 2003 | Cliff Kincaid

Posted on 10/14/2003 3:03:49 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

On both sides of the Atlantic, the media have highlighted the credentials of Wesley Clark, the retired general who has entered the Democratic race for president. Bob Herbert of the New York Times said Clark "led the successful military operation in Kosovo in 1999," while The Guardian of London called him "the U.S. hero of Kosovo." Human Events is the only newspaper we have seen which noted that the Kosovo war was initiated by Bill Clinton "without seeking prior authorization from Congress."

But it’s far worse than that. Ignoring the constitutional role of Congress, Clinton waged his war through executive order and presidential directive. Clinton used executive orders to designate a "war zone," call up troops, proclaim a "national emergency" with respect to Yugoslavia, and impose economic sanctions on the Belgrade government.

Without any acknowledgment of the role of Congress, Clinton claimed the power to wage war on Yugoslavia through his "constitutional authority" to conduct "foreign relations," as "Commander in Chief" and as "Chief Executive." Clark was technically the supreme Allied Commander of NATO, but Clinton actually delegated command-and-control of U.S. forces to NATO and its then Secretary-General Javier Solana, who had the authority to order U.S. troops into military action. Without getting Congressional approval, Clinton also announced a new "Strategic Concept" for NATO that went far beyond the defensive purposes of the alliance outlined in the NATO treaty. This new document was never submitted as a treaty for ratification by the Senate.

Several dozen members of Congress filed a lawsuit under the War Powers Act to compel the President to follow the Constitution. The 1973 law permits the President to conduct hostilities for a maximum of 60 days without Congressional authorization. He must, however, notify Congress within 48 hours of engagement in hostilities. Clinton complied with that requirement but exceeded the 60-day limit. The House explicitly refused to approve the action in Kosovo on a tie vote but the Clinton administration continued to wage the war anyway.

To validate his own actions, Clinton later signed another executive order, this one to establish a "Kosovo Campaign Medal" for certain military personnel participating in the operation. But criteria developed by the Pentagon meant that it was limited only to those who served in and around the Balkans. Clark, who was based at NATO, was ineligible for the award but finally received it after getting a special waiver. Earlier, Clinton had cited Kosovo in giving Clark a Presidential Medal of Freedom.

The continued deployment of U.S. troops in Kosovo is one reason why some observers say the U.S. doesn’t have enough troops in Iraq. A Congressional Budget Office report says that the Pentagon could free up additional units for rotation to Iraq by withdrawing Army forces from Bosnia, Kosovo and other areas. This would enable the Pentagon to increase the size of the force in Iraq by another 12,000 to 13,000 military personnel.

(Excerpt) Read more at aim.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2004; aim; balkans; cliffkincaid; kosovo; wesleyclark; wesleykanne
Our Illegal War - April 26, 1999 - "It is a remarkable spectacle to see the Clinton Administration and NATO taking over from the Soviet Union the role of sponsoring "wars of national liberation." More remarkable still, and even more unsettling, is the fact that the beneficiary in the case of Kosovo — the so-called Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) — is a collection of Maoist drug-peddlers and terrorists who have been armed by Iran and provided with training and support by Saudi terrorist financier Osama bin Ladin, who is the world’s most notorious sponsor of international terrorism."
1 posted on 10/14/2003 3:03:49 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

The page cannot be found

The page you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is unavailable.

Please try the following:

  • If you typed the page address in the Address bar, make sure that it is spelled correctly.
  • Open the www.freerepublic.com home page, and then look for links to the information you want.
  • Click the Back button to try another link.
  • Click Donate to help support the best site on the web. Face it, you don't want to sit down to start freeping someday, only to see...


HTTP 404 - File not found




2 posted on 10/14/2003 3:04:13 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
INTREP - KLINTONISTA CLARK
3 posted on 10/14/2003 3:16:27 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Exactly. That was was illegal, immoral, and against our national security interests. We not only were guilty of flagrant war crimes, we fought on the wrong side. I fervently wish that Bush had pulled our troops out when he had the chance. But if not then, now. Why on earth are we still mixed up in that nightmare? To make sure clinton continues to get his cut of the drug money?
4 posted on 10/14/2003 5:39:30 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson