Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/11/2019 8:11:17 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet
Chicago, man.

Rahm should be paying attention to his own neck of the woods.

2 posted on 03/11/2019 8:15:35 AM PDT by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

[[At this stage in the 1992 election cycle, President George H. W. Bush was riding high, buoyed by America’s success in the Gulf War. Less than two years later, Bill Clinton moved into the White House]]

He also had Ross Perot and Bush 1 was not a very good campaigner.


3 posted on 03/11/2019 8:15:43 AM PDT by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Democrats should attack trump on caving to globalists by the plans to INCREASE H-1 and H-2 visas. But they won’t because the Uni-party™’s all on-board the Cheap Labor Express.


4 posted on 03/11/2019 8:15:58 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Dream on, Rahm.


5 posted on 03/11/2019 8:18:32 AM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“A winning 2020 candidate needs three things: authenticity, credibility, and viability”.
????????????????????????????????????????????
What are 3 things Rahm knows nothing about?


6 posted on 03/11/2019 8:20:11 AM PDT by o-n-money (n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
authenticity, credibility, and viability

Demolitioncrats CAN'T do the first two. That should lead to making the third one impossible. BUT, half of the voters are brain dead to the first two.

10 posted on 03/11/2019 8:32:27 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Kill-googl,TWITR,FACBK,NYT,WaPo,Hlywd,CNN,NFL,BLM,CAIR,Antifa,SPLC,ESPN,NPR,NBA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

According to the latest polls, the ‘RATS’ best chance of winning the presidency in 2020 is to nominate a really old white guy as their candidate. Nancy’s “Sparklers” are only hurting the party. LOL.


12 posted on 03/11/2019 8:38:41 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (#NotARussianBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
...capable of making Trump the first one-term president in more than a quarter century. But to get there, we’ll need to put some of our internal disagreements on hold...priorities should be to produce a candidate who will appeal to the widest swath of both moderate and progressive voters. Until January 21, 2021, we need to make sure that everything else is set aside.

Yep, democrat plan in is to run on unity, lies, and BS to get the win then on January 21, 2021 reveal who they really are... In short they'll play the flyover yahoos for fools, then take the 'win' and 'pivot' to Washington DC to consolidate phony elites and the deep state... Yahoos will be out in the cold once more with broken stupid promises...

16 posted on 03/11/2019 8:58:36 AM PDT by GOPJ (Democrats are attacking Ivanka & Jared ostensibly on security clearances - reality is antisemitism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

He might have a point. If illegals get the right to vote and Florida and Texas start turning color and millennials want to play with the fire of socialism and the democrats make overtures to the Rust Belt and ballot harvesting continues... then these are legitimate problems for the Republicans.

You can only pray that the democrats are too divided and too caught up with Trump derangement so that they are ineffective in capitalizing on these advantages. But it would be a good step for Republicans to start to address these problems.

For example, what are the advantages of a great GDP if half the country don’t pay income tax or if the millennials don’t care about work? Why is there a growing divide between the middle class and the very wealthy. What can Republicans do to ensure that access is available to the wealthy class. If it access isn’t available then socialism seems more attractive in its call to tax the rich. This needs to be addressed effectively.


17 posted on 03/11/2019 9:06:28 AM PDT by BEJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“A winning 2020 candidate needs three things: authenticity, credibility, and viability.”

Nah. All the winner needs are enough votes which can be bought through fraud and bribery.


18 posted on 03/11/2019 9:08:31 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
He’s making a bet that if he labels Democrats “socialists” frequently enough, he’ll be able to drive a wedge that scares swing voters out of the Democratic fold.

It is a legitimate issue.

But Trump is probably smart enough to avoid overkill.

It's not like plenty of other people won't be talking about it.

20 posted on 03/11/2019 9:14:19 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

TWO WORDS: HEALTH CARE

We were promised a ‘great’ plan. He has not delivered. No one cares about the ‘why’, mr. President, deliver GREAT healthcare for EVERY citizen or call it a day. Because the people will vote for even CRAPPY healthcare for all.

Any SOB who even *thinks* about using the words ‘pre-existing’ condition can get a 9mm round to the head as far as I am concerned, slow death from a gut shot would be even better for them; many of us got laid off (losing our health coverage) AFTER we had preexisting conditions and now have difficulty getting covered, AFTER doing everything right for 30+ years. Anyone who is OK with that deserves painful death.

Health care for EVERY American citizen, period, or you’re fired no matter HOW much many of us love everything else you are dong.


21 posted on 03/11/2019 9:17:02 AM PDT by RedStateRocker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
It seems to me that every President in modern history except George H.W. Bush has been deemed as vulnerable 2-3 years into his first term. Most go on to be re-elected. Of those modern Presidents with low approval ratings in their first term, only Carter didn't rally back to win re-election.

Approximately 20 months from the election, a lot can happen but unless there is a substantial event that damages Trump and the Democrats find a decent candidate (and the pool of clowns currently assembled contain none), defeating Trump is going to be a formidable task.

22 posted on 03/11/2019 9:18:24 AM PDT by CommerceComet (Hillary: A unique blend of arrogance, incompetence, and corruption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The Democrats should follow the lead of Bernie Sanders and give him the nomination which they stole in 2016. And they should clean up their act and embrace freedom of speech as embraced by AOC and Representative Omar. The country may not survive (it won’t anyway) but it sure would be a fun campaign!


24 posted on 03/11/2019 9:34:36 AM PDT by grania ("We're all just pawns in their game")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Well, of the likely/declared candidates, *every one* of them is authentically communist, credibly anti-American, and viably totalitarian, so in that sense they all fulfill the criteria. Put a name in the blank and tell me where I go wrong. (Hickenlooper is perhaps the least insane of them and he has 0.1% traction) I think the ticket will be Kamala Harris/Bob O’Rourke. She strikes all the victimology classes — black (well, sorta), woman, commie, prostitute... — while he is a prodigious fund raiser.


25 posted on 03/11/2019 9:43:30 AM PDT by crusher (GREEN: Globaloney for the Gullible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

How Not to Lose to Donald Trump

_____________________________________________________

Oh that’s easy:

1) Leftists should emigrate from overwhelmingly Leftist states to Red states and...

2) Make sure there are enough ballots harvested in key areas to turn the tide in states that are contested.

That’s precisely what I expect the Left to do.


27 posted on 03/11/2019 9:43:57 AM PDT by Bishop_Malachi (Liberal Socialism - A philosophy which advocates spreading a low standard of living equally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Poor Rahm Emmanuel!

He has figured out how to get the “dead” to vote, but

he hasn’t figured out how to get the “dead” to pay taxes!


29 posted on 03/11/2019 10:08:35 AM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
That's weird.

If a Democrat "wins" the White House in 2020, I refuse to recognize that person as president.

32 posted on 03/11/2019 11:31:38 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Mitt Romney, Chuck Schumer's p*ssboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson