Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Something Feels Really Off About Jill Stein's Recount Effort
Pajiba ^ | November 25, 2016 | Dustin Rowles

Posted on 11/25/2016 9:14:46 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Hillary Clinton’s lead in the popular vote has increased now to 2.1 million votes and counting. She has received more votes than any other white or female candidate in the history of the United States. Indeed, Donald Trump may have garnered more votes than any other Republican in history, but he’s getting trounced in the popular vote. By the time counting has finished, Clinton’s 2+ million vote lead over Donald Trump will be a bigger vote lead than 28 eventual Presidents had over their opponents.

It’s not exactly a landslide (Obama beat McCain by 9 million votes, and Romney by 5 million), but it’s sizable enough that it should erase any question about Donald Trump having a mandate. He does not, and as infighting among his own administration continues and eventually carries over into infighting with the GOP-led Congress (which is inevitable), that will become clear.

What is also clear is this: Donald Trump won the Electoral College. Fair or not, that’s what matters, but now there are attempts being made to cast doubt on even that after Jill Stein decided — after playing spoiler in the general election — to use her standing to challenge the vote counts Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania.

It’s a Hail Mary, but it’s my fear that it might be the kind of Hail Mary pass that’s picked off in the end zone and ran back for a touchdown. The thing is: I don’t trust Jill Stein. She did not seem to have the best interests of the country in mind during the general election, and I’m not so sure she does now. As much as I’d like to see the election overturned somehow over a recount, I have a sneaking suspicion that this is not about ensuring a fair election, or attempting to sneak Hillary in the back door, but about Jill Stein.

Stein has so far raised $4.5 million in her efforts to force a recount in those three states, although her original goal was only $2.1 million, and then it was $4.5 million, and now it is $7 million, ostensibly to cover legal costs. My guess is that she will get the $7 million, because those of us on the left are desperate for some hope, moreso after each and every cabinet appointment is announced. The $4.5 million that Jill Stein has raised so far, as I understand it, is more than her entire general election campaign raised.

(TWEET-AT-LINK)

My fear, however, is that it won’t matter. Maybe — maybe — it results in a win for Hillary in Michigan, where the margin is only 10,000 votes. However, short of unearthing a discovery that might undermine our entire Democratic electoral process in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, it’s not likely to tilt the election back in Clinton’s favor. And when it doesn’t, we have to suffer that humiliating defeat all over again, notwithstanding the popular vote lead we are clinging to as though it can slow the march toward what will surely be the most corrupt Presidential administration in the history of the United States.

Do we really want to be taunted again by Trump and Kellyanne Conway?

(TWEET-AT-LINK)

Besides, what would actually happen if the electoral college swung back in favor of Clinton? I mean, I really don’t know. Does she get to take back her concession? Would she even want to? Will the election get tied up for months in legal challenges? Will it fall to the Supreme Court again to decide the election, where it is tied 4-4, which would likely mean the lower court vote stands? Not to mention what might happen with the angry, gun-toting Trump supporters fueled by fake news who might go absolutely apocalyptic in the event that Clinton somehow takes back the White House.

Why does this all feel like a really bad season of Scandal?

We might be better off pinning our hopes (and money) on Foster Campbell, a Democrat set to face off in a run-off election for a Senate seat on December 10th in Louisiana. His hopes of winning are slim (he’s down by 15+ points in one poll), but if Democrats could somehow get a massive turn-out-the-vote effort for an election that probably would have an otherwise low turnout, we could at least narrow the Senate lead to 51-49, which might give us some more hope in weeding out Trump’s hardline, inexperienced cabinet appointments (and preventing Trump from pushing through a wholly incompetent Supreme Court justice).


TOPICS: Campaign News; Issues; Parties; State and Local
KEYWORDS: 2016recount; democrats; electoralcollege; hillary; hillaryrecount; recount; sorosrecount; stein; steinrecount
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
Some of the left are figuring out the scam?
1 posted on 11/25/2016 9:14:46 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Stein is being pushed by Hillary’s donors, so the stink doesn’t rub off on her considerable ankles.

The Left is the Left is the Left. This is what they do.


2 posted on 11/25/2016 9:18:01 AM PST by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So Jill Stein is the front-man for a Hillary/Soros-sponsored recount which will go nowhere, while the court system is going after Debbie-Hillary-Donna for the fixed Primaries against Bernie. So...Soros is working to get Bernie sworn in as the 45th President of the US. Do I have it all straight?


3 posted on 11/25/2016 9:18:49 AM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator Goldwater

She was bought the same way Bernie was bought with a vacation house after “losing”.


4 posted on 11/25/2016 9:20:05 AM PST by max americana (For the 9th time FIRED LIBERALS from our company at this election, and every election since 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hey lefties.

Jill could care less about this election.

She is going to be the hard socialist thorn in your side for a generation.

She will easily siphon away 10% of the democrat vote


5 posted on 11/25/2016 9:20:08 AM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It couldn’t POSSIBLY be that ol’ Jill wants somebody to pony up $6 or $7 Million$ for a “recount”, and then her canary dies, or her cat gets a hairball, and the “recount” never happens; do you? Naaaah! A democRAT would never do something like that./S


6 posted on 11/25/2016 9:20:37 AM PST by Tucker39 (Welcome to America! Now speak English; and keep to the right....In driving, in theolog and politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It’s democrats who use mass voter fraud... if she gets her way we’re gonna take a long hard look at Philly and Detroit...

That might be why the Clinton’s aren’t backing her.


7 posted on 11/25/2016 9:20:46 AM PST by GOPJ ("Fear is a good thing. Fear is going to lead you to take action"...Steve Bannon 2010 interview.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“...what will surely be the most corrupt Presidential administration in the history of the United States. “

HAhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah. If Hillary had been elected then statement would be true. They are completely delusional, bonkers, insane and just plain stupid.


8 posted on 11/25/2016 9:21:55 AM PST by Castigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It WILL MATTER as far as vote integrity information. So I’m for it, at least in Wisc and Mich- Pa is a another mess entirely.

But NO, it won’t change the result.


9 posted on 11/25/2016 9:23:45 AM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I gotta believe that Stein is just building up a massive Jill Stein slush fund, taking advantage of credulous donors.


10 posted on 11/25/2016 9:24:05 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Psephomancers for Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Angry gun toting Trump supporters... Yes. Be warned.


11 posted on 11/25/2016 9:24:23 AM PST by BigEdLB (To Dimwitocrats: We won. You lost. Get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Hillary Clinton’s lead in the popular vote has increased now to 2.1 million votes and counting

Which, oddly enough, is roughly the same number of illegals who were registered to vote in California.

12 posted on 11/25/2016 9:25:03 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Instead of Hillary or Bezos , I hope Trump goes after Soros.


13 posted on 11/25/2016 9:25:42 AM PST by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Do we really want to be taunted again by Trump and Kellyanne Conway?

I hope the author is a Monty Python fan. Otherwise, he's just pathetic.


14 posted on 11/25/2016 9:26:16 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

Hillary’s claiming that she was cheated in a game of chess by claiming the rules of checkers were broken.


15 posted on 11/25/2016 9:26:39 AM PST by myerson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"The thing is: I don’t trust Jill Stein. She did not seem to have the best interests of the country in mind during the general election, and I’m not so sure she does now>"

Oh, now that's funny..!! Since when has ANY leftist EVER had the best interest of America in mind...?? And I think we can be "pretty sure" they never will..!

16 posted on 11/25/2016 9:26:51 AM PST by unread (Joe McCarthy was right.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

How amusing author thinks Foster Campbell has any hope for Louisiana Senate Seat.


17 posted on 11/25/2016 9:27:44 AM PST by donozark (It is true after all. Hillary Clinton really IS the Fouke Monster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Isn’t the author confused? If there is a problem with the Electoral College, the House decides the election not the Supreme Court.


18 posted on 11/25/2016 9:28:21 AM PST by Atlantan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
...as though it can slow the march toward what will surely be the most corrupt Presidential administration in the history of the United States.

I guess this guy hasn't heard the news. Hillary did not win. We avoided the corruption.

19 posted on 11/25/2016 9:28:26 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Castigar
“...what will surely be the most corrupt Presidential administration in the history of the United States. “

More corrupt then Obama..? THAT would be one tough job to do...

20 posted on 11/25/2016 9:32:32 AM PST by unread (Joe McCarthy was right.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson