Skip to comments.
Computer just predicted this party will win the White House in 2016
Fortune ^
| OCTOBER 15, 2015
| Laura Lorenzetti
Posted on 10/16/2015 5:10:46 PM PDT by entropy12
Likely more accurate than polling data.
Reuters built a computer model to predict which political party will win the presidency in next year’s election, and the results are in: a Republican will most likely be moving into the White House in 2017.
(Excerpt) Read more at fortune.com ...
TOPICS: Campaign News
KEYWORDS: 2016; election; general
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Better than Polling!
1
posted on
10/16/2015 5:10:47 PM PDT
by
entropy12
To: entropy12
To: entropy12
Truly a breakthrough in...the obvious.
To: entropy12; MeshugeMikey; Slings and Arrows; Nachum
* ERROR *
They simply MUST hire new investigators to see how the computer could support the Republicans. Must be some other answer...
4
posted on
10/16/2015 5:14:04 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Will Bernie Sanders run as an Independent if he does not get the nomination of the Democrat Party?)
To: entropy12
Is this the same computer model that predicted hockey stick global warming?
To: a fool in paradise
Chads and Jeremy.......
Looks like a trump devotee to me.......
6
posted on
10/16/2015 5:14:57 PM PDT
by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: a fool in paradise
7
posted on
10/16/2015 5:15:16 PM PDT
by
entropy12
(When you vote for a candidate, you are actually voting for his/her rich donors!)
To: entropy12
That means Trump will be the next POTUS
8
posted on
10/16/2015 5:18:34 PM PDT
by
rwoodward
("god, guns and more ammo")
To: MeshugeMikey
If HEILLery wins, America will be gone...
9
posted on
10/16/2015 5:19:09 PM PDT
by
newfreep
(TRUMP/Cruz 2016 - "Evil succeeds when good men do nothing" - Edmund Burke)
To: entropy12
Well, I'm certainly not going to count on some machine. I'm waiting to hear what Karl Rove predicts. Then, I'll know what's going to happen.
10
posted on
10/16/2015 5:20:04 PM PDT
by
Tau Food
(Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
To: a fool in paradise
11
posted on
10/16/2015 5:20:37 PM PDT
by
gorush
(History repeats itself because human nature is static)
To: entropy12
But contrary to the Great Weeping and Gnashing of Teeth that will accompany this Republican’s ascension, there will be no significant cutback in social welfare benefits.
12
posted on
10/16/2015 5:20:56 PM PDT
by
Mr. Jeeves
(Heteropatriarchal Capitalist)
To: entropy12
13
posted on
10/16/2015 5:21:29 PM PDT
by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
To: Tau Food
14
posted on
10/16/2015 5:21:31 PM PDT
by
doc1019
(Out of my mind ... back in 5)
To: Tau Food
Well, I'm certainly not going to count on some machine. I'm waiting to hear what Karl Rove predicts. Then, I'll know what's going to happen.Karl Rove? Are you kidding? Not Me! I'm waiting to hear what Dick Morris has to say!
To: entropy12
Likely more accurate than polling data. Really?? Why is that?
Having read about their model, it's just not that sophisticated. It'd make a good sophomore project for a 4yr Comp Sci degree.
16
posted on
10/16/2015 5:23:36 PM PDT
by
FourPeas
("Maladjusted and wigging out is no way to go through life, son." -hg)
To: entropy12
To: entropy12
Reuters built a computer model to predict which political party will win the presidency in next year’s election, and the results are in: a Republican will most likely be moving into the White House in 2017.Reuters?
Computer model?
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
Computer model?
Seriously?
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
This is such a blatant desperation misdirection hoping to suck the clueless GOPe into relaxing, not continue to attack the socialists, to relax fund raising, TV commercials and hammering the incompetent record of the last 7 years.
Fortunately, that has zero effect on the GOP front runners, who are not about to relax their effective momentum.
Reuters?
Seriously?
18
posted on
10/16/2015 5:27:15 PM PDT
by
publius911
(Pissed?? You have NO idea!)
To: FourPeas
At this point in election cycle, I doubt if Nostradamus can predict accurately.
19
posted on
10/16/2015 5:27:27 PM PDT
by
entropy12
(When you vote for a candidate, you are actually voting for his/her rich donors!)
To: entropy12
20
posted on
10/16/2015 5:29:31 PM PDT
by
FourPeas
("Maladjusted and wigging out is no way to go through life, son." -hg)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
