Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/26/2012 1:32:53 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

“inflammatory” tells you all you need to know about the author.


2 posted on 06/26/2012 2:12:31 AM PDT by TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The OBAMACARE panel gave me the feeling their decisions could deny my life without due process. Seriously. That could make it unconstitutional at the core.


5 posted on 06/26/2012 3:04:18 AM PDT by Rapscallion (Defy by silence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If ObamaCare is upheld....well the National DeathPanel all wear black robes and sits in a building behind Capitol Hill....we used to call the Supreme Court.


8 posted on 06/26/2012 3:21:14 AM PDT by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If 0bama0care is so great, why are the politicians and unions exempt from it?

And why did they want to be exempt from it?


9 posted on 06/26/2012 3:31:21 AM PDT by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The death panels are there.

Sarah is right.

No matter how the idiot that wrote this article tries to twist the truth,The truth is that there will be rationing and death because of it.


10 posted on 06/26/2012 3:34:22 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
But Palin's initial comments make no mention of the IPAB. At the time, she referred to a proposal in the House's healthcare bill to have Medicare reimburse doctors for discussing end-of-life planning with their elderly patients.

What an idiot.

Yes, she referred to "end-of-life planning" specifically as an example, but the broader point she was making was the a board of bureaucrats were going to make cost-based treatment decisions as a result of the law, which would basically be choosing who gets to live and die. Whether it was actually called a "death panel" or IPAB, or anything else for that matter, she accurately predicted what the logical result of the law would be.

11 posted on 06/26/2012 4:07:38 AM PDT by kevkrom (Those in a rush to trample the Constitution seem to forget that it is the source of their authority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Even one of the NYT resident socialists, Paul Krugman, has acknowledged MengeleCare will have Death Panels.


12 posted on 06/26/2012 4:12:14 AM PDT by newfreep (Breitbart sent me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Just look at the only graphic in Dr. Ezekiel Immanuel, et. al.’s article in the January 29, 2009, of Lancet, and the answer is apparent. Follow this with what is currently happening in “our pattern,” according the the man in charge in Washington, the NHS in Great Britian, and Palin’s conclusion just kind of gets nailed to the floor.

Us old folks who are not independently wealthy are in great danger of health care services being rationed because, according to them (read ‘death panel’), our useful life is fininshed.

Also, a side benefit is that our “early removal” will help lower the pressure on the SS funds held in the great “lock box” in the sky....what? There’s no lock box...who knew?


13 posted on 06/26/2012 4:13:56 AM PDT by jennings2004 (President Hayes, Mount Rushmore, telephone, Dear Leader...what a mix!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It is pretty obvious the death panels are coming...just look at the new “guidelines” for breast and prostate cancer screenings created by a group of government bean counters. The current standards for mammograms and PSA testing were developed by cancer researchers and physicians actually treating cancer. However according to government bean counters these are to be thrown out because there is no “statistical difference” in outcome and they might lead to “unnecessary” and expensive tests. Tell that to the thousands of Americans whose lives were saved by such frequent tests.


14 posted on 06/26/2012 5:52:44 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

No surprise, but Sam Baker just lied. It wasn’t Palin who brought up the end-of-life counseling provisions as the part of Obamacare she opposed. It was the media and many pols who jumped to that conclusion. Palin made two subsequent posts addressing these errors by the media.

In the link that Baker uses in this story, it’s Palin’s response to Obama referring to end-of-life counseling. Obama tired to steer people to believe that she was referring to end-of-life counseling when she referred to “death panel”. That was a lie, and here we are today with Baker lying about it again. Do you wonder why Baker didn’t link Palin’s original post where she first used the term “death panel”? It’s because she did NOT refer to end-of-life counseling in it. Again, the link that Baker has used here is a response to an erroneous conclusion by Obama and others.

Here’s the link to her initial post. Notice there is no mention of end-of-life counseling. It wasn’t Palin who called that counseling a “death panel”. As a matter of fact, Palin favors voluntary end-of-life counseling. http://www.facebook.com/note.p...

Some of you try to minimize the actuality that the IPAB is in essence a death panel, of which there is no appeal process, by writing that its the insurance companies that have the death panel. One has nothing to do with the other. Besides, as bad as insurance company decisions can be, you still have the right of multiple appeals as well as working with your state insurance commissioner to advocate for you. With the IPAB, there is absolutely no appeal process.

This article has nothing to do with facts. It has everything to do with trying to belittle Palin. She was right then and she’s right today. Sam Baker is a two-bit hack who either can’t comprehend the written word or he’s purposely lying. I suspect it’s both.


15 posted on 06/26/2012 6:17:27 AM PDT by RefudiateObama2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Gov. Palin is exactly right. The first place we will see death panels is in the neonatal intensive care units (NICU). No more will there be all out efforts to save every baby. Under Obamacare an assessment of their “worth” will have to be made according to government “guidelines” before these infants can have any treatment.


16 posted on 07/01/2012 7:35:53 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson