Skip to comments.
In Breitbart’s Last Column, Did He Endorse Newt Gingrich?
The Election 2012 News Blog ^
| March 5, 2012
Posted on 03/05/2012 9:46:59 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
What say you?
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I don’t think this is his final “vetting.”
2
posted on
03/05/2012 9:50:02 AM PST
by
struggle
(http://killthegovernment.wordpress.com/)
To: onyx; Jim Robinson
3
posted on
03/05/2012 9:54:07 AM PST
by
2ndDivisionVet
(You can't invade the US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.~Admiral Yamamoto)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Breitbart is stopping short of anything approaching an official endorsement — in keeping with his promise at CPAC to support whomever is chosen to run against Obama in election 2012That is the definitive statement. Anything else is just speculation. Had Breitbart wished to endorse a candidate he would have done so in very clear language.
4
posted on
03/05/2012 9:55:04 AM PST
by
citizen
(The Dims will all unite for Zero. We must soon unite behind our challenger and back him to victory!)
To: citizen
5
posted on
03/05/2012 9:59:00 AM PST
by
CainConservative
(Santorum/Huck 2012 w/ Newt, Cain, Palin, Bach, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Petraeus in the Cabinet)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Let’s do an SAT type question.
Which two of the following do not fit:
A: Andrew Breitbart
B: Sarah Palin
C: Newt Gingrich
D: Mitt Romney
E: Rick Santorum
just sayin.......
To: citizen
Agreed. Andrew had no problem with saying what was on his mind.
7
posted on
03/05/2012 10:02:02 AM PST
by
SuzyQue
To: citizen
Really? The implication is clear to me who it is of the three candidates that already posesses (in spades) the only
“strategy” Breitbart points to, lauds, wants and recommends.
Wake up.
“If any of the candidates can resist the media, and parlay Newt’s strategy into a nomination, we’ll have the choice between an imperfect but well-known Republican and the real “Baraka”.....
8
posted on
03/05/2012 10:04:31 AM PST
by
RitaOK
(LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt knows where all the bodies are buried, because he buried them.)
To: C. Edmund Wright
9
posted on
03/05/2012 10:05:22 AM PST
by
CainConservative
(Santorum/Huck 2012 w/ Newt, Cain, Palin, Bach, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Petraeus in the Cabinet)
To: RitaOK
Some Santorum supporters, like CC, do not have the brain power to deal with nuances and even clear implications. They are sort of sad that way.
To: CainConservative
BWAHAHAHAHA!
Santorum in clerical collar and seen whining now against DRUDGE, is NOT a strategy Andrew would be seen recommending.
Brietbart was pointedly speaking of *strategy”, not who can squeal the loudest.
chuckle, chuckle, snort.
11
posted on
03/05/2012 10:12:43 AM PST
by
RitaOK
(LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt knows where all the bodies are buried, because he buried them.)
To: C. Edmund Wright
"Which two of the following do not fit:" Palin and Romney. The rest are males.
12
posted on
03/05/2012 10:15:25 AM PST
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Joe 6-pack
TOUCHE. Good one.
If you keep that up, I’m going to have to back down on my claim that all Santorum supporters are humorless!
To: CainConservative; citizen
Mentioning “satan,” in a 2008 speech makes one some kind of nut, but gathering around the séance table to divine the hidden endorsement of Breitbart is a perfectly rational act.
14
posted on
03/05/2012 10:19:15 AM PST
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: RitaOK
Oh, speaking of Drudge. Do you think it’s any coincidence that Breitbart’s plan was to open up a competitor to Drudge Report after the Drudge report shredded Newt openly and obviously for months?
To: 2ndDivisionVet
GO Newt!
Dear God, I miss Andrew Breitbart.
16
posted on
03/05/2012 10:20:00 AM PST
by
onyx
(SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
To: C. Edmund Wright
Yes, nuance for sure, and sometimes it’s also clear that even the *obvious” whizzes right over the cranial region, causing some exposure for other regions.
Puts one in mind of Sarah’s non-endorsement endorsement of Newt.
Hidden in plain sight.
17
posted on
03/05/2012 10:20:12 AM PST
by
RitaOK
(LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt knows where all the bodies are buried, because he buried them.)
To: RitaOK
Yep.
Though credit where it is due: Joe 6 Pack did make a funny......a talent Ive yet to see in CC or AC or Naps or even Rick himself....
To: kristinn; Ron C.; conservativejoy; Marguerite; Cincinatus' Wife; true believer forever; ...
In Breitbart’s Last Column, Did He Endorse Newt Gingrich?
19
posted on
03/05/2012 10:24:57 AM PST
by
onyx
(SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
To: C. Edmund Wright; RitaOK
Why wouldn’t one brilliant, masterful, hero warrior be for the only other brilliant, masterful warrior?
20
posted on
03/05/2012 10:29:43 AM PST
by
onyx
(SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson