To: 2ndDivisionVet
Breitbart is stopping short of anything approaching an official endorsement — in keeping with his promise at CPAC to support whomever is chosen to run against Obama in election 2012That is the definitive statement. Anything else is just speculation. Had Breitbart wished to endorse a candidate he would have done so in very clear language.
4 posted on
03/05/2012 9:55:04 AM PST by
citizen
(The Dims will all unite for Zero. We must soon unite behind our challenger and back him to victory!)
To: citizen
5 posted on
03/05/2012 9:59:00 AM PST by
CainConservative
(Santorum/Huck 2012 w/ Newt, Cain, Palin, Bach, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Petraeus in the Cabinet)
To: citizen
Agreed. Andrew had no problem with saying what was on his mind.
7 posted on
03/05/2012 10:02:02 AM PST by
SuzyQue
To: citizen
Really? The implication is clear to me who it is of the three candidates that already posesses (in spades) the only
“strategy” Breitbart points to, lauds, wants and recommends.
Wake up.
“If any of the candidates can resist the media, and parlay Newt’s strategy into a nomination, we’ll have the choice between an imperfect but well-known Republican and the real “Baraka”.....
8 posted on
03/05/2012 10:04:31 AM PST by
RitaOK
(LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt knows where all the bodies are buried, because he buried them.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson