Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BARE-BUTT BRITNEY BURNED UP
NY Post ^ | October 10, 2003 | Dick Johnson

Posted on 10/10/2003 7:42:49 AM PDT by presidio9

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:17:05 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

WHILE men the world over drooled over the latest cover of Esquire, which featured Britney Spears mimicking a famed 1966 Angie Dickinson photo, Spears herself was livid. Sources say the singer - who appears in less and less clothing with each successive magazine cover - was "humiliated" by her bottom-baring pose, which had her standing sideways in a skin-tight sweater and white stilettos. The photo was shot by James White for Esquire's "70 Years of Women We Love" issue. "Britney thinks the pictures are too naked and is really angry at Esquire," a magazine insider said. "But really, is she out of her mind? I mean, her brother was at the shoot. Exploited? Is she crazy? Look at the photos she has done for everyone else. The Rolling Stone cover was practically naked, too - but she wasn't exploited by them?" Relations between Esquire and Spears have been frosty ever since editor David Granger thought he had an exclusive on the pop tart - and then she posed for other magazines without telling him. A rep for Spears declined comment.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: angiedickinson; brit; britanny; britannysbehind; britannysbutt; britney; brittney; canoesforfeet; esquire; idlovetotapthat; noboobsbabs; nudepantyhose; rollingstone; spears
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 10/10/2003 7:42:49 AM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


2 posted on 10/10/2003 7:44:23 AM PDT by presidio9 (Countdown to 27 World Championships...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

GOD BLESS OUR MILITARY
THANK A VET!
MAKE A DONATION TODAY

Keep Our Republic Free

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com


STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER and say THANKS to Jim Robinson!
IT'S IN THE BREAKING NEWS SIDEBAR
Thanks



3 posted on 10/10/2003 7:44:33 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Looking for an excuse to post that pic again, eh? ;^}
4 posted on 10/10/2003 7:44:50 AM PDT by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Sources say the singer - who appears in less and less clothing with each successive magazine cover - was "humiliated" by her bottom-baring pose, which had her standing sideways in a skin-tight sweater and white stilettos.

Then why did she let them take the picture?

5 posted on 10/10/2003 7:45:10 AM PDT by Pest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
Looking for an excuse to post that pic again, eh? ;^}

All I do is pass on the news as I find it. I have no editorial bias.

6 posted on 10/10/2003 7:46:05 AM PDT by presidio9 (Countdown to 27 World Championships...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I never realized what a huge ... career she has.
7 posted on 10/10/2003 7:46:17 AM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Protestations of modesty from 'the reluctant virgin'? How quaint.
8 posted on 10/10/2003 7:46:46 AM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
To tell you the truth, I'm not a fan. She has limited talent and I do not ususlly find her attractive, but I find this pose quite appealing.
9 posted on 10/10/2003 7:48:26 AM PDT by TankerKC (NEWS ALERT: SEXUAL HA(R)ASSMENT (D)EEME(D) SE(R)IOUS ONCE AGAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"All I do is pass on the news as I find it. I have no editorial bias."

Excellent! Keep up this very hard work your doing, we all appreciate it. I'd like to edtitor her bias.

10 posted on 10/10/2003 7:49:23 AM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper
Simply a technique (taught to her by her mentor, Madonna) to generate more press for her new CD/video (which features Madonna). The girls just can't get enough.
11 posted on 10/10/2003 7:49:49 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC
but I find this pose quite appealing.

Personally I like the original batter.

How big a slut do you have to be before you bring your brother to a nude photo shoot? Eeeewwwww.

12 posted on 10/10/2003 7:51:59 AM PDT by presidio9 (Countdown to 27 World Championships...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I always thought Britney was unusually pretty and that is a pretty decent derriere. I even think she was at one time a basically nice girl.

Unfortunately I think her years around the Hollywood scum has had it's usual effect. She has now joined them in becoming trash.

13 posted on 10/10/2003 7:52:30 AM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf
Excellent! Keep up this very hard work your doing, we all appreciate it. I'd like to edtitor her bias.

Apparently the moderator did not. This got moved to chat awful fast. Prudes.

14 posted on 10/10/2003 7:53:29 AM PDT by presidio9 (Countdown to 27 World Championships...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
From the waist up, I think Angie looks better, on the other hand Britney does have a better bottom.

For some reason this thread reminds me of a girl I knew in high school. She was pretty and had an unusually well developed rear. She really wasn't flat chested but I guess we all must have been concentrating on her best feature because a lot of guys called her "no boobs Babs".

15 posted on 10/10/2003 8:16:27 AM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Spears without the makeup

16 posted on 10/10/2003 8:18:17 AM PDT by PaulJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog; PaulJ
From the waist up, I think Angie looks better, on the other hand Britney does have a better bottom.

Two things:
1) Angie is a little older.
2) I am almost postive Britany is wearing "nude" pantyhose. Spandex is a modern miracle.

(ok I admit, I may have studied the picture a little too closely)

17 posted on 10/10/2003 8:41:37 AM PDT by presidio9 (Countdown to 27 World Championships...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Thank you!
18 posted on 10/10/2003 9:37:25 AM PDT by b4its2late (Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late
What's the story with yourtagline. Are you French?
19 posted on 10/10/2003 10:13:46 AM PDT by presidio9 (Countdown to 27 World Championships...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Danged if she ain't got canoes for feet, though. (Britney, that is)
20 posted on 10/10/2003 10:32:14 AM PDT by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson