Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tucker: Rep. Dan Crenshaw is LIAR re: TikTok bill; Crenshaw responds
Twitter/X ^ | March 15 | Tucker Carlson

Posted on 03/15/2024 7:40:33 PM PDT by RandFan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: RandFan

Re: 18 - it’s clear that none of this happens unless a foreign adversary controlled application is involved.


21 posted on 03/15/2024 8:40:07 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Re: 20 - no, I’m not wrong.

Show specifically where ANY news site or web site can be “shut down”.


22 posted on 03/15/2024 8:41:40 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Fury

Oh yeah so why have they made it broad and “at the determination of the President”?

Also re “FOREIGN” have you heard of FISA (”FOREIGN Intelligence Security Act”)? They use(d) that DOMESTICALLY

It’s a trojan horse. Stop shilling for it


23 posted on 03/15/2024 8:42:48 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Fury

I just gave it to you? You’re ignoring it

They can get at the ISPs and App stores which are IN THE USA ... not “foreign”.


24 posted on 03/15/2024 8:44:02 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

I’m not shilling - you’re reading the bill wrongly.

Nothing happens to any website, any software, any app, unless:

8 “It shall be unlawful for
9 an entity to distribute, maintain, or update (or en-
10 able the distribution, maintenance, or updating of) a
11 foreign adversary controlled application by carrying
12 out, within the land or maritime borders of the
13 United States, any of the following:

It’s right there - nothing happens unless a foreign adversary controlled application is involved. It’s very clear.


25 posted on 03/15/2024 8:50:39 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Fury

Keep telling yourself this and maybe it’ll be true !

IT should be a one line bill the reason it isn’t is because they have stuffed all kinds of nonsense and broad definitions into it.

Think before you post

It unlikely to survive a court challenge


26 posted on 03/15/2024 8:54:20 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Fury

Re: 25 - Passed bill here:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7521?s=1&r=1


27 posted on 03/15/2024 8:54:51 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Fury

All of it “at the determination of the president”

Which can be of either party or persuasion

You trust SENILE Joe to make the right determinations?


28 posted on 03/15/2024 8:55:31 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

I’ve not only thinking before I posted, I’ve read the bill.

Have you?


29 posted on 03/15/2024 8:55:43 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

It does not give the president any authority. It gives him specific authority.


30 posted on 03/15/2024 8:56:25 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fury

You’re ignoring the troublesome parts and cherry-picking


31 posted on 03/15/2024 8:57:24 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Re: 28 - Biden can’t do anything unless a “covered company” and that is controlled by a foreign adversary is involved.


32 posted on 03/15/2024 8:59:31 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Re: 31 - no, I’m reading the entire bill.

Do you know what a “foreign adversary” is as defined in the bill?

Do you know what a “covered company” is as defined in the bill?


33 posted on 03/15/2024 9:01:20 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Fury

I think you are mistaken. I am tired of the erosion of our Bill of Rights. This has to stop. And I am no fan of most of the social aps.


34 posted on 03/15/2024 9:01:26 PM PDT by antceecee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Too bad that IED only took his eye.


35 posted on 03/15/2024 9:01:29 PM PDT by dadgum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fury

If you say so

I’ve got to do things now:)

Just ask yourself why not a one line bill to force the sale ?

Why all this that we’re arguing over ?

They’ve got their eye on more than just TikTok for Havens sake!


36 posted on 03/15/2024 9:02:38 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Heavens*


37 posted on 03/15/2024 9:03:08 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dadgum

Re: 35 - what a trashy thing to say.

It’s sad that more and more posters are anti-military.

But it is what it is.


38 posted on 03/15/2024 9:05:25 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Fury

Not anti military - anti RINO garbage.


39 posted on 03/15/2024 9:07:41 PM PDT by dadgum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Exactly.


40 posted on 03/15/2024 9:10:41 PM PDT by kiryandil (what Krynky doink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson