Posted on 02/19/2024 7:11:30 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Back in the mid-1980s, there was a highly successful ad campaign that ran for about a dozen years. Promoted and sponsored by the American Dairy Board, the campaign featured the tagline, “Milk: It Does A Body Good,” and it stressed how milk was necessary for strong bones, healthy joints, and attractive body.
Then, in 1993, another national campaign was started by MilkPep (Milk Processor Education Program) that initiated the “Got Milk” Phrase. That later expanded to include celebrities who appeared with milk mustaches.
Aaahh, the good old days. Even if you weren’t much of a milk drinker, and by then I was not, there was something wholesome about those commercials. Now, though, my oh my, how things have changed.
The Telegraph reported that a leaked letter from a University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust medical director claimed that milk produced by trans women, with the help of drugs, is “comparable to that produced following the birth of a baby.” This is a hospital that has driven over the woke edge of reality. This is the place that coined the ridiculous terms “chestfeeding” and “human milk.” It created what it called the “first clinical and language guidelines supporting trans and non-binary birthing people.”
The letter went on to convey certain guidelines that allow trans women to produce milk through “induced lactation.” They must take the hormone progesterone to develop milk-producing glands. Other drugs, such as domperidone, which is given to biological women who are having difficulty breastfeeding, are needed to help stimulate the production of prolactin, another hormone that signals the body to produce breast milk.
Last year, the hospital, which is willing to be as woke as possible, defended the World Health Organization’s guidance of “overwhelming evidence” that stated “human milk” is better for a baby than formula.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
True
The woke group kept saying chestmilk (ugh) is nutrition identical to breastmilk, but no references or studies were given. I’ve websearched for nutritional information for chestmilk with zero results. And where are the studies verifying antibody transference, plus something else I think was important, but I forgot. Anyways, where are the nutritional analysises of chestmilk? Plus, the fact that domperidone causes heart problems in affected infants. #pweetingonceagain.
Oy vey.
Yes. They never cited studies to validate their claim. Science forgotten or never therw?
You’ve summed up the demonic lefts’ (or Demonicrats) final solution.
I just read “LGBTs need to do something about their Pedos ASAP” I was going to post it. Oh, well, I can add keyword coming4yourchildren.
Whew, progesterone.... morning sickness incoming :-/
Sadly the UK is even more sick than the USA. Pity those poor babies.
Disgusting - and in a sane world based on reality it could never be considered necessary.
Given that company’s history that doesn’t even sound far fetched.
Gross.
“There is a reason why mother nature set it up this way for real mothers”
Let me fix it for you...
There is a reason why God set it up this way for real mothers
There is no “mother nature” only Father God.
Are you a believer in Gaia? A FALSE god.
THAT won’t get you to heaven, only hell. Oh well, its ONLY for ETERNITY. Just wait out the torment until the end of eternity.
Yeah, like Tang is "comparable" to orange juice. They are both orange.
Why believe a cabal of mass murderers when it comes to child health?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.