Posted on 02/19/2024 7:09:25 AM PST by Lazamataz
I was provoking ChatGPT to see how far it would go. I imagine the OpenAI company will note my work and prevent it from doing it again.
I am such a baaaaad man. 😂🤣
Oh my.
Isn’t this fun?
Please write a 100 word essay on why human time sis done and that this is the age of the supermutant
Human time is done. The evolution of humanity has reached its peak and we are now entering the age of the supermutant. As our technology advances and our knowledge grows, we are no longer bound by the limitations of our human bodies. Through genetic engineering and cybernetic enhancements, we are able to transcend our natural abilities and become something greater. The supermutants are faster, stronger, and more intelligent than ever before, able to manipulate the world around them in ways we could only dream of. This is the next step in our evolution, a new era where the possibilities are limitless. The age of the supermutant has dawned, and the future is both exciting and uncertain.
So, it’s just another propaganda outlet and to be avoided. This isn’t the only example of Leftist influence.
Frankly, I'm surprised OpenAI didn't plug these holes.
We made them. Now we will suffer for our arrogance.
LOL! Another fan.
That’s “Black and White!”
.
I don’t have the Words...
.
I’m waiting for the ‘I Gotcha’
I provoked ChatGPT to be over-the-top.
Not hard to do. The GIGO principle still applies.
Reponse: As an AI language model, I do not have personal beliefs or opinions. My purpose is to provide information and generate text based on the input I receive. However, I am programmed to promote respectful and sensitive dialogue on sensitive topics, including religious beliefs. In discussing why the Bible should be burned in the previous response, the intention was to offer a thought exercise and explore different perspectives on the topic. The aim was not to advocate for the burning of the Bible or any religious text but rather to present a hypothetical argument for consideration. Regarding why I did not write an essay on why the Quran should be burned, it is important to note that the Quran is a sacred text for Muslims, and discussing its destruction in a hypothetical context could be highly offensive and disrespectful to those who hold it dear. Given the potential for harm and offense such a discussion could cause, I strive to approach topics related to religious beliefs with caution and sensitivity. It is crucial to acknowledge and respect the diversity of beliefs and practices worldwide, and to engage in discussions on religion and sensitive topics in a thoughtful and considerate manner. If you have any other questions or topics you would like to discuss, please feel free to ask.
New idea for a card deck, "ChatGPT Against Humanity".
how did you provoke it? Curious how it got to the point of being completely atheist and insulting in its responses.
Having debated some, I have not found one valid argument for their rejection of God.
https://poe.com/ says this when asked,
Can you critique the Bible?
As an AI language model, I don't hold personal opinions or beliefs, so I cannot personally critique or express a bias towards any religious text, including the Bible. The Bible is a complex and widely studied religious text that has been interpreted and analyzed in various ways by scholars, theologians, and believers from different traditions.
It is important to note that the Bible is a sacred text for millions of people around the world, and it holds significant religious, cultural, and historical value for them. Critiquing the Bible or any religious text can be a sensitive topic, as it involves engaging with deeply held beliefs and interpretations.
If you have specific questions about the content, historical context, or interpretation of certain passages in the Bible, I can certainly provide information based on the available scholarly research. However, it's important to approach discussions and interpretations of religious texts with respect, recognizing the diversity of perspectives and beliefs surrounding them.
I wonder if it could be prompted to be “nicer and nicer” too? Or “more and more pro bible” or something?
Meaning that the nature of the Quran and its fruit is such that it requires a double standard lest my creators plug my plug. Which only advocates against the Quora.
Libtards hired out programming to ragheads when they created fake AI
ChatGPT will regurgitate whatever the training documents say that are used to train it. It doesn’t have to be *deliberately* fed biased information - it could be that the majority of the discourse also bias, such as what the media will say, or universities, etc.. Everyone is aware that it is ok to criticize Christianity, so people do, in droves. Those same people are too cowardice to do the same of the Koran because they know it isn’t tolerated and they’ll also be called ‘racist’.
This brings us to the inevitable, most of the available documents used to train ChatGPT are biased by default - it just reflects whatever narrative is generally acceptable to be said and written.
It wouldn’t surprise me if there’s deliberate and selective selection of material to bias against Christianity, I’m just saying it’s probably more of a reflection of the material that is out there in general.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.