The covid booster cancer time bomb

Aletho News ^ | 1/30/2024 | Professor Angus Dalgleish

[Beave Meister]

I have previously reported on my concern about the rise in stable cancer relapses that I have witnessed in my melanoma clinic.

None of these patients of mine presented with the classic prodrome of relapse that I had always noticed previously, such as severe depression due to bereavement, divorce or bankruptcy. Indeed the only thing I found they had in common was to have had a recent booster mRNA covid vaccine. I phoned around my colleagues not only in the UK but also in Australia to check their experience. In no case did they deny such a link. Indeed, they were equally alarmed at the association between booster vaccines and relapse that they too were witnessing, as well an increase in new cancers, particularly in those below 50 years old. In addition to melanoma these colleagues were also very concerned about a sudden big increase in young patients with colorectal cancer.

Rather than instigating a proper inquiry to investigate this when we raised these concerns, the medical authorities told us all that what we were witnessing was a coincidence, that we had to prove it and above all, not to upset our patients.

Recently the American Cancer Society (ACS) has warned of a surge in new cancer cases in the US this lastyear of over 2million, with many of these cases occurring in younger patients. Indeed, the chief scientific officer of the ACS, William Dahat, announced in addition that cancers were presenting with more aggressive disease and larger tumours at the time of diagnosis, especially in younger patients. Of further interest it noted a difference in the microbiome (the community of micro-organisms such as fungi, bacteria and viruses that exist in a different environment) between patients under 50 compared with those over 50.

[Beave Meister]

Oh yeah, “safe and effective.” The jab and the boosters were never "Safe" and never "Effective." Those responsible for this genocide need to be held accountable to the fullest extent of the Nuremberg Code.

[Jane Long]

Thx for posting.

This line stood out, right off …

None of these patients of mine presented with the classic prodrome of relapse that I had always noticed previously …

[brookwood]

While clinical trials are often misleading, anecdotal evidence and conjecture are more likely to be useless.

[SaxxonWoods]

My SiL got vaccines and boosters. Within a few months of last booster she had a Melanoma relapse after 20 years of testing cancer-free. The original cancer was small and on her arm. The tumors erupted all over, including her brain. Doctors did multiple surgeries but the cancer spread faster than they could remove it. She was gone in 6 weeks and suffered horribly.

[Owen]

There is a lot of evidence out there that those people who were never vaxed are at great risk of cancer as a result of being around people who were, in fact, vaxed.

The only protection against this would be to mask up.

[metmom]

While clinical trials are often misleading, anecdotal evidence and conjecture are more likely to be useless.

Nonsense. Sometimes people noticing what is blown off as *anecdotal accounts* is the beginning of people noticing a trend.

Clinical trials *sometimes* misleading?????

Considering the increase in revelation of the amount of fraud in *studies*, I'd consider anecdotal evidence to be far more reliable than deliberate fraud.

[metmom]

While clinical trials are often misleading, anecdotal evidence and conjecture are more likely to be useless.

Nonsense. Sometimes people noticing what is blown off as *anecdotal accounts* is the beginning of people noticing a trend.

Clinical trials *sometimes* misleading?????

Considering the increase in revelation of the amount of fraud in *studies*, I'd consider anecdotal evidence to be far more reliable than deliberate fraud.

[frogjerk]

Not-fully-tested mRNA "vaccines" suppressed immune systems. This caused cancer patients to come out of remission and in some instances created conditions for "turbo cancers".

I have witnessed this with a close family member that was in remission for 9 yrs and 50 weeks - right on the precipice of the 10 year mark. Got the shot and came out of remission with an additional type of cancer they never had before.

Another close family member had shingles for 3 months after getting vaccinated. Caught COVID anyway and they had to admit it was nothing compared to 3 months of shingles.

[Jane Long]

anecdotal evidence and conjecture are more likely to be useless....

---

So says Dr FRAUDci Brookwood, anonymously, from his/her keyboard.

Tell us, again, where YOUR private practice is? And, where you received your medical degree, did your residency, etc.

FYI ...

Angus Dalgleish
FMedSci FRACP FRCP

Angus Dalgleish, March 2016
Born May 1950 (age 73)[1]
Harrow, London, England
Alma mater University College London
Employer St George’s, University of London
Known for HIV/AIDS research[2]

Political party UK Independence Party (UKIP)
Website www.sgul.ac.uk/profiles/gus-dalgleish

Angus George Dalgleish (born May 1950) FRCP FRCPath FMedSci[2] is a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, best known for his contributions to HIV/AIDS research.[3][4][5][6] Dalgleish stood in 2015 for Parliament as a UKIP candidate

[dforest]

Instead , what has been done is the law regarding informed consent has been tossed out the door by Congress. I am sure the drug companies love this. They can make guinea pigs out of people trying out new drugs and never telling them there are any dangers. If they already know that there could be a problem, they don’t have to inform the patient.

Nice and corrupt way to slink out of liability.

[one guy in new jersey]

gaslight

[grey_whiskers]

You sound jabbed.

Get stuffed.

[armydoc]

I profess to be ignorant to this evidence. Could you point me to it? I try to keep up with the vaccine data but haven’t seen any real evidence to which you are referring, just conjecture.

[Thommas]

..anecdotal evidence and conjecture are more likely to be useless.

Not always, FRiend. Such conjecture often leads to clinical studies that vouchsafe the premise.

Sadly, all the anecdotal evidence in the world will not get Big Pharma off its butt to undergo these studies.

[odawg]

I’m waiting for someone to sagely throw in “correlation does not imply causation”.

[EVO X]

The only protection against this would be to mask up.

OMG, you have to be a Chinese bot. LOL

[noiseman]

Considering the increase in revelation of the amount of fraud in *studies*, I'd consider anecdotal evidence to be far more reliable than deliberate fraud.

None other than the editor of the New England Journal of Medicine published an editorial a few years ago in which he bemoaned the sorry state of “medical research”, and said that 95% of published research papers are simply wrong, and often even fraudulent. He went on to say that this phenomenon was being driven by the cutthroat competition for research grants, leading many “researchers” to do whatever it took, even fraud, to draw attention to their “research.”

“Publish or perish” has consequences.

[ducttape45]

I think there was article posted here on FR that told of turbo cancers on the rise at a senior living community in FL. Yeah, so much for “safe and effective.” I’m of the opinion that all this was planned, forced genocide of an entire generation of people.

[metmom]

Now masking up prevents cancer?

Imagine that.......

[icclearly]

While clinical trials are often misleading, anecdotal evidence and conjecture are more likely to be useless.

Let me fix that comment for you......

While clinical trials are often misleading likely to be useless, anecdotal evidence and conjecture are more likely to be useless, much better than rigged politically based outcomes by a lying government and a crooked big pharma!

There. Fixed. Much better.