Posted on 11/19/2023 7:07:51 AM PST by rod5591
A former South Carolina teacher was arrested Wednesday for preying on a 17-year-old high school football player, according to a local news station.
Married mother-of-two Reagan Anderson, 27, is facing two counts of sexual battery on a Holly Hill Academy student for the alleged abuse, WCSC reported.
The alleged victim's mother blasted Anderson at a bond hearing on Thursday.
"A trusted coach, teacher and friend that abused our trust and violated her oath as an educator. She has ruined our son's life," the teen's mother read from a statement in court.
"He should be 100% focused on being a fun-loving football-playing young man, but this predator has robbed him of that ability. No young quarterback or athlete is safe in our community if this woman is free," the outraged mother continued.
The judge set Anderson's bond at $2,500 and told her not to have any contact with the victim or his family. She was released with a GPS monitor the same day.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Let’s hear from the victim...
“He should be 100% focused on being a fun-loving football-playing young man”
I think he was having some fun.
The family of the 17 year old boy just released the information that he has been hospitalized due to severe shoulder damage due to thousands of high-fives. Our thoughts and prayers are with him.
BS, the kid has great memories that will last a lifetime.
His only regret will be that he couldn't keep his mouth shut, and likely bragged to his buddies.
LOL!
Meanwhile in Ohio and the recently passed Constitutional Amendment:
Article I, Section 22. The Right to Reproductive Freedom with Protections for Health and Safety
A. Every individual has a right to make and carry out one’s own reproductive decisions, including but not limited to decisions on:
1. contraception;
2. fertility treatment;
3. continuing one’s own pregnancy;
4. miscarriage care; and
5. abortion.
B. The State shall not, directly or indirectly, burden, penalize, prohibit, interfere with, or discriminate against either:
1. An individual’s voluntary exercise of this right or 2. A person or entity that assists an individual exercising this right,
“Every individual” it says. “Included but not limited to” it says.
So if a 27 year old teacher decides to be impregnated by a 17 year old student, is it constitutionally protected? If a 17 year old student decides to be impregnated by a 27 year old, is it constitutionally protected?
I wish she was my teacher when I was 17
Charged with Battery. I guess the battery in her pocket rocket died.
Married with kids, not cool.
If anything, it will ruin the husband and the childrens’ lives.
Half the guys in my high school class way back in the dark ages were poring the teachers. These stories do nothing but ruin many lives. It’s nit nice to fool Mother Nature...
“”LOL”
ALL the replies fit that one!!! LOL
I agree. Like it or not, the double standard still lives. The boy is 17, not 13, What happened to him is still called getting lucky among 17 year old boys. I never heard of a 17 year old boy winding up in therapy for getting lucky with an attractive “older woman”. Having said that, since she was his teacher, she needs to be fired for violating school policy.
Yeah sure! Give us a break.
Who is that in the second pic? Certainly not the “victim”.
No matter what the law presumes, the kid was as lacking in good sense and moral standards as the teacher. His parents surely played a role in that.
The 17-year-old student is old enough to go to war. He should have been grateful and kept his mouth shut.
The student was 17, not 13. And boys are different from girls.
There is homewrecking involved here, so it isn’t to be taken lightly. But let’s not make it out to what it isn’t.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.