Yes, I missed Dr. Rose's Process 1 & Process 2 issue
Continuing your post:
"Bottom line: the jabs that the public got were NOT the ones submitted to the FDA for EUA approval - totally different process
. ..then we start getting into the Process 2 DNA contamination issues , E.coli endotoxin, SV40 enhancer that is oncogenic and did not need to be in the shots,
so were intentially included .... and on & on the horror show goes."
Then this is also an INTENTIONAL case of criminal "bait and switch" on the general public,
as well as a criminal corporate Big Pharma fraud.
If so, then bring on the "Nuremberg Code" trials in the Hague.
Then this is also an INTENTIONAL case of criminal “bait and switch” on the general public, as well as a criminal corporate Big Pharma fraud.
**************
It would seem so and should break their liability shield. The lawyer bringing actions in Australia has signed McKernan up as an expert witness (as well as others on the panel in the past).
In the interest of accountability and justice, Nuremberg 2 should happen ... the “discoveries” that just happened should make it easier since there was a ‘bait & switch’ plus certain inclusions in the ‘switched’ shots foisted on the public were not only undisclosed, but harmful/deadly and intentional.
I believe the us gov already knows something is up. The last few weeks have been full of government officials claiming the Vax was optional and not mandated. Why would they even try that BS?
“Bring on the Nuremberg Code trials”
At the very least let us consider something like the Camp LeJeune (sp?) contaminated water legal case. Our government has agreed to compensate many people for any harm caused there. The US military supervised the water system. The US government supervised and made rules regarding the vaccination system.
Another note: Pfizer and Moderna both gave their first vaccines unidentifiable names—Comirnaty (Pfizer), and Spikevax (Moderna). Better to hide from readers with.