(From the article:)
”Key Statements and Questions to be Addressed:”
-”Bacterial DNA in mRNA vaccines: It has come to our attention that bacterial DNA has been found in some mRNA vaccine vials.
We recognize the importance of understanding the potential implications of this discovery. “
”-Foreign DNA instructing mRNA production: There are claims that this foreign DNA could instruct our bodies to produce mRNA and foreign proteins.
We aim to explore the validity of these claims and assess their impact on vaccine safety and efficacy. “
”-SV40 genetic sequence in COVID-19 vaccines: Reports suggest the presence of a cancer-promoting genetic sequence called SV40 in the Covid-19 vaccines.
We seek to gather expert insights and evaluate the significance of these findings.”
”-Global confirmation and regulatory response: It has been alleged that these discoveries have been confirmed in a dozen laboratories worldwide.
We will examine the scientific evidence supporting these claims and discuss the actions taken by medical regulators in response. “
(My Opinion) : An investigation research by a highly competent medical board is long overdue considering the following the alleged uncertainties of the covid #*vaccine*# ,
which isn't within the historical accepted medical standards of a true vaccine.
The description of the covid #*vaccine*# had to be adjusted in order to sell this experimental concept to the general public, along with the complying mass media.
Unknowns still exist related to genetically being passed down to future generations as naturally occurring immune genetic code may have been permanently changed for future generations
Such a genetic experiment has never before been approved, accepted, or even been conducted, much less than on such a massive scale.
Given the secrecy afforded Big Pharma by the FDA/CDC regarding the contents of the #*vaccine*#,
as well as missing clinical studies under which it was approved leaves many unanswered questions.
Also, the unique indemnity from civil lawsuits given to Pharma from possible harm from the #*vaccine*# is highly questionable given their prior history and previous civil lawsuits.
Let us not forget that this previous unknown covid disease is a direct result of genetic tinkering with “Gain of Function” research that has international ramifications.
Those who authorized it, funded it, and still remain silent still walk among us.
Also hiding the #*vaccines*# contents for a proposed 72 years by the licensing agency is previously unheard of, much less tolerated.
Did you pick up the Process 1 & Process 2 issue? Dr. Rose got into it.
From:
Report 86: Pfizer’s Clinical Trial ‘Process 2’ COVID Vaccine Recipients Suffered 2.4X the Adverse Events of Placebo Recipients; ‘Process 2’ Vials Were Contaminated with DNA Plasmids.
https://dailyclout.io/pfizer-process-2-vaccine-had-2-4-times-adverse-events/
What is Process 2, and why all the fuss?
The terms ‘Process 1’ and ‘Process 2’ were mentioned by Pfizer in the different iterations of the clinical trial protocol for this novel drug platform that would be used worldwide. The ‘process’ refers to the way the ‘vaccine’ was manufactured.
The original manufacturing process of BNT162b2, Pfizer’s COVID ‘vaccine,’ for the clinical trial used a messenger RNA duplication (amplification) technique known as PCR (polymerase chain reaction) — essentially like a photocopier, multiplying/cloning the original mRNA. This is known as ‘Process 1’.
*** Pay special attention to THIS NEXT paragraph ****
Commercially, this type of process is expensive and would have to be significantly ramped up to provide doses for the whole world. The commercial scaling of the product used a proven way of mass production using e. coli bacteria. This mass production technique is ‘Process 2’. The thorny issue was that ‘Process 2’ used a completely different manufacturing process than that used for the product in the clinical trial (Process 1), and the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the ‘vaccine’ was granted based on Process 1. Moreover, Process 2 was not compliant with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP). Note the FOIAed national contracts with Pfizer from South Africa and Albania.
Revelations from gene sequencing of the residual product in the vials produced using Process 2 by Kevin McKernan, confirm other groups’ reporting of the determination that there is marked contamination of the modified mRNA with high levels of DNA plasmid fragments.
******
Bottom line: the jabs that the public got were NOT the ones submitted to the FDA for EUA approval - totally different process. Those in the ‘trial’ for Process 2 did not sign up for what they got. That being said, then we start getting into the Process 2 DNA contamination issues, E.coli endotoxin, SV40 enhancer that is oncogenic and did not need to be in the shots, so were intentially included .... and on & on the horror show goes.
I just discovered another report regarding scientific study of vaccines and our immune system. This in Time, last year. This study of Pfizer vaccine only compared Covid or vaccine effects on the T cell portion of the Immune System. This 4 month study enrolled 72 people. They looked at CD 4(helper) and CD 8(killer) T cells at various times before and after vaccination(s) and illness with Covid-19. Normally T 4 and 8 increase after infection, but Covid seems to make T4 increase, while T8s decrease over time. The scientists suggest this may be part of the Long Covid problem. They urge larger and more complex studies involving various vaccines.
https://time.com/6265510/covid-19-weaken-immune-system/
This next link is what I found while looking for the first article I read on “Class Switch” of IgGs from IgG1 to more IgG4s. Since it appears that more IgG4s appear in the blood after repeated shots for allergies like pollen or bee sting this may not be a good thing where getting sick from Covid is concerned. If you are stung by a bee, higher IgG4s will lower your response to the sting resulting in lower anaphylactic shock reactions. This is a good thing. On the other hand if you catch Covid-19, apparently higher IgG4s may react less to fight the virus. This could be a bad thing.
For some reason I found this article even harder to read than the first Class Switch study I read, perhaps because it goes into even more detail with technical terms. Many abbreviations are used. These appear in parentheses after their first use. I find it helpful to write down each abbreviation and the words it means, thus having a list to refer back to. In this report I found more terms that I would have to search elsewhere to better understand what they are describing or mean. Perhaps someone can give the link(s) to the first or other IgG4 related studies.
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciimmunol.ade2798
Bottom line, the researchers agree a lot more longer studies with more participants are needed. All aspects of the immune system need to be looked at for a number of both old, common, and new vaccines. Fauci’s moves to put almost all of his $6 billion annual research funds into new drugs needs to change. A lot more of this kind of basic research needs to be funded. Moreover, this Covid pandemic has enabled some researchers to discover the value of Vitamins D3 and C, zinc, Ivermectin, and HCQ. Therefore, these and other known items with potential value need a lot more thorough study with larger numbers of participants. These studies are unlikely to make drug companies rich. But,it is our TAX MONEY that Fauci and others have been using. Tell your Congresscritters to target money toward helping all of us, not mostly toward making drug producers richer.