Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Mean Girl’ Tina Fey Paid Me Nothing for Hit Franchise: Author
New York Post ^ | March 18, 2023 | Sara Nathan

Posted on 03/18/2023 8:36:58 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Writer Rosalind Wiseman has watched as “Mean Girls” became a global cultural phenomenon.

She should be thrilled that her book, “Queen Bees and Wannabes,” was turned into a hit movie, then a Broadway musical — and now the musical is to be turned into a movie too.

But while writer and producer Tina Fey and Paramount Pictures have made millions out of the franchise, Wiseman has made just over $400,000 after signing a deal to sell her film rights back in 2002, and not a cent since. Now, she is speaking out against a real-life Mean Girls culture and the “painful experience” that has stopped her from getting her alleged dues — revealing Paramount has even told her the studio has not made any profit from the franchise.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: hollywood; meangirl; meangirls; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkpost; paramountpictures; rosalindwiseman; saranathan; saturdaynightlive; saturdaynightvile; tinafey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 03/18/2023 8:36:58 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
But while writer and producer Tina Fey and Paramount Pictures have made millions out of the franchise, Wiseman has made just over $400,000 after signing a deal to sell her film rights back in 2002, and not a cent since.

She should probably blame her agent, not Fey.

2 posted on 03/18/2023 8:38:49 PM PDT by Drew68 (Ron DeSantis for President 2024. The real conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The studios use “creative accounting” to try to say that they’ve not made money on films. They’ve been doing it forever.

CC


3 posted on 03/18/2023 8:39:22 PM PDT by Celtic Conservative (My cats are more amusing than 200 channels worth of TV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Tina Fey is a tw@t. Don’t whitewash it.


4 posted on 03/18/2023 8:40:16 PM PDT by sauropod (“If they don’t believe our lies, well, that’s just conspiracy thmkeorist stuff, there.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

The “net” is never positive. Should have asked for a cut of the gross. Standard hollywood accounting.


5 posted on 03/18/2023 8:41:32 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

She didn’t sell for a share of the profit. She sold it straight-up and it became an unexpected hit.

That’s just how the ball bounces sometimes.


6 posted on 03/18/2023 8:42:05 PM PDT by Jonty30 (It is not how many that go into Mexico that counts. It is how many that return from Mexico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

As I read once, “You don’t get what you deserve, you get what you negotiate.”


7 posted on 03/18/2023 8:43:22 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
She should probably blame her agent, not Fey.

She was a nobody back in 2002. You have to establish yourself as a star before you can ask for more money.

8 posted on 03/18/2023 8:47:38 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Same deal as music labels. When an artist signs for a percentage of profit, somehow those releases never seem to make any money. Weird.


9 posted on 03/18/2023 8:48:15 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

That’s because Mrs. Fey is a flaming lefty, just like all the other Harveywood miscreants.


10 posted on 03/18/2023 8:51:14 PM PDT by No name given (Anonymous is who you’ll know me as.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

What a bunch of con artists and chumps.


11 posted on 03/18/2023 8:51:43 PM PDT by No name given (Anonymous is who you’ll know me as.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The author of the book that became the movie “Sideways” was griping a week or two ago about the pittance that he’s made off that film. Same situation. At some point, a deal is a deal. No one has a crystal ball about whether a movie will even be made, let alone become a hit. At the time this woman sold the movie rights to her book for $400k, she undoubtedly thought it was a good deal. And if the movie had never been made or it turned into a flop, her $400k would look pretty good. If you want to avoid having to watch your work turn into a blockbuster you’re not profiting from, then ask for the Alec Guinness deal (i.e., a percentage of the gross rather than a lump sum).


12 posted on 03/18/2023 8:54:41 PM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler

Also, if Tina Fey did not own the name Mean Girls, she would have done the same thing under a different name that she did own and told a slightly different story. Mean Girls the musical exists because Fey owns the rights. Not because anyone read this ladies book.


13 posted on 03/18/2023 9:01:08 PM PDT by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

She sold it for $400K. Seller’s remorse.


14 posted on 03/18/2023 9:08:27 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy ( Dementia Joe is Not My President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
revealing Paramount has even told her the studio has not made any profit from the franchise.

The only way a movie and the studio directly make a profit is if the movie is a complete surprise blockbuster. Otherwise the studio piles up expenses on the movie for catering, production costs, film distribution, advertising expenses, etc., etc., etc. which are then routed back into the studio but no longer officially as profits for the movie. Few things in the world are more crooked than Hollywood accounting. Even the Treasury takes lessons from them.

First rule of Hollywood is take money as cash up front or (as a second choice) as a percentage of the gross. Never, ever, ever, ever take a percentage of the net. You're better off getting two movie posters and a voucher for a box of popcorn.

15 posted on 03/18/2023 9:11:37 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Gain of Pfunction. Gain of Pfunding. Gain of Pfizer. Now in control of Project Pferitas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler
Winstom Groom, who wrote the movie Forrest Gump was based on, was supposed to get 3% of NET. But of course the movie, which made $678 million in box office, on a $55 million budget, lost money, so he got no money.
16 posted on 03/18/2023 9:13:28 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

George Lucas claim that Return of the Jedi never turned a profit.


17 posted on 03/18/2023 9:27:11 PM PDT by Seruzawa ("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

AMC had to pay Frank Darabont a lot of money over this issue.


18 posted on 03/18/2023 9:57:22 PM PDT by 31R1O (The people who can control themselves ought to be able to defend themselves from the people who cann)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
The only way a movie and the studio directly make a profit is if the movie is a complete surprise blockbuster.

All of real life is graded on a curve. Only about 10% of movies ever make a profit, and that general rule applies to areas of endeavor where conscious beings make an evaluation. Only about 10% of businesses, restaurants, books, shows, websites, video loggers, beauty contestants, college students, etc., find enough success to make their work efforts worth it. However, the winner-take-all profits from that 10% success rate make trying worth it. It's not possible to predict ahead of time which of the 10% will be winners. All players must try their hardest, and only 10% will be happy with their results.

Leftism is motivated by a desire to spread out life's winnings evenly, minus the government bureaucracy's 50% redistribution fee. But it never works out in reality. The only way to successfully distribute all the winnings evenly is to make sure there are no winnings to redistribute.

19 posted on 03/18/2023 10:10:57 PM PDT by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Tina Fey received at 13th Annual Kennedy Center the Mark Twain Prize for American Humor on November 9, 2010

Carol Burnett did not get the award till the 16th Mark Twain Prize for American Humor and only after people made lots of comments about how unfunny Tina Fey is and that Carol Burnett is funny.

Tina is just snarky.


20 posted on 03/18/2023 10:47:15 PM PDT by minnesota_bound (Need more money to buy everything now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson