It’s what Dave said just after that, that most missed.
Yes the “Perhaps were are both wrong” perspective.
Sorry, “...we are both...”, too early to post for me i guess.
Once you go down that road, if it’s ok for a woman to kill a baby because she doesn’t want the burden, then it’s discriminatory to not allow the man the same option (”Your choice? Ok, you deal with your own choices and leave me out of it”)
And it next logically follows, that unrelated humans who are inconveniently needy can be disposed of by the same reasoning.