Once you go down that road, if it’s ok for a woman to kill a baby because she doesn’t want the burden, then it’s discriminatory to not allow the man the same option (”Your choice? Ok, you deal with your own choices and leave me out of it”)
And it next logically follows, that unrelated humans who are inconveniently needy can be disposed of by the same reasoning.
Under American law the financial support belongs to the child, not the parent. The end result is that neither parent can unilaterally get out of payment without a court order. I understand the argument but I side with the court on this. No matter what the argument is before hand once a kid exists both parents have a duty towards it.