Posted on 06/25/2022 12:49:24 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla has said he is working on the creation of a new vaccine against COVID-19 that could be taken annually in order for people to become more “compliant” in taking COVID vaccines.
Bourla made the comment at a press briefing organized by the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers & Associations (IFPMA), which took place Wednesday and where he discussed the creation of a new COVID vaccine.
An annual vaccine to boost ‘compliance’
“What the world really needs is a vaccine that can last a year,” stated Bourla.
The head of the pharmaceutical giant described this idea as “the optimal public-health solution,” arguing that it would be easier to get the public to comply with a yearly vaccination, as opposed to vaccination every three or four months.
“A vaccine that will be taken once a year is way [easier] to administer and [to] have the population be compliant with it,” he said.
When asked by media briefing host Claire Doole about his prognosis regarding COVID and the alleged need for vaccination, Bourla replied that the virus is “very difficult to eradicate.”
“The most likely scenario is that the virus will continue being with us for the years to come,” he said.
Bourla laments lack of enthusiasm for short-term boosters..
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...
Like Novavax?
But with these mandates there have been some strange exceptions. CEOs and employees of BigPharma, Congress and many federal agencies and the CDC itself. Hmmmm. Rules for you but not for me.
Compliance? lol
Well, that ol jake leg don’t know this Texan.
This PureBlood shall not comply
May the pfizer ceo and like-minded individuals roast for eternity in the hottest part of hell.
If Pfizer and Moderna want to produce yearly variants of their vaccines targeting the latest seasonal variants, great - I’ll get one along with my yearly flu shot. But it better not be mandatory.
Fixed it.
So one shot a year for every person on the face of the Earth means how much profit for Pfizer???
DITTO!!!
Ditto.
Why would I want a shot that still allows me to catch the virus it’s supposed to prevent AND I can still transmit it. All for an ailment I have a 99.8% probability of recovering from as long as I don’t have FOUR comorbitities....not to mention the distinct possiblity of side effects from these shots that I may or may not ever recover from.
No thanks.
How ‘bout NOOoooo
I thought he was saying you're never going to get people to continue taking a vaccine every three or four months, but you might be able to get them to take it once a year. Never mentioned mandates.
I personally wouldn't take it once a year either, but his argument is common sense whether you choose to take it or not.
Pfizer CEO ain’t even vaxxed and he’s telling us to jab.
Let that sink in...
Since all of the original “vaccines” did not “protect” for more than three months (if at all) the drug companies need to demonstrate that an annual “vaccine” “protects” for a year without a series of followup boosters.
I could be wrong but it would seem “Compliance” implies coercion.
“...that I may or may not ever recover from.”
And am NOT allowed to sue for redress, not the drug companies, not the government.
Take a little Vitamin D3, Zinc and Magnesium and you don't need it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.