Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Retired Florida cop who killed man in movie theater for texting acquitted of murder
NY Post ^ | February 26, 2022 | Jesse O’Neill

Posted on 02/26/2022 6:01:53 AM PST by conservative98

The retired Florida police captain who fatally shot a man inside a movie theater in 2014 was acquitted of murder by a jury late Friday.

Curtis Reeves, 79, was charged with second-degree murder after he gunned down 43-year-old Chad Oulson during a matinee screening of “Lone Survivor” in suburban Pasco County.

Defense lawyers and prosecutors were in agreement that Reeves asked Oulson to stop texting during the movie previews — which started an argument that ended with the former Tampa police captain opening fire.

Reeves pleaded not guilty on the grounds of self-defense.

His lawyers successfully argued that police training informed Reeves’ decision to open fire, as he believed his life was in danger when the victim threw his cellphone at his face and appeared ready to climb over the seat and attack him.

Reeves “had more knowledge, more experience, more study in that area than anyone in this courtroom,” defense attorney Richard Escobar said. “It’s a dangerous world.”

Prosecutors countered that Reeves’ ego was bruised when Oulson threw popcorn in his face, and there was no real threat.

“In his entire career that is the most he has ever been scared? Absolutely unreal,” prosecutor Scott Rosenwasser said of the former homicide bureau, fugitive apprehension and SWAT team commander.

“He didn’t fear anything.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: banglist; chadoulson; curtisreeves; excop; fairtrial; florida; lonesurvivor; lookwhohatescops; lookwholovestyrants; pascocounty; police; popcorn; richardescobar; scottrosenwasser; selfdefense; texting; theatershooter; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 02/26/2022 6:01:53 AM PST by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: conservative98

sounds like nonsense to me, but for sure that movie was pretty bad.


2 posted on 02/26/2022 6:07:02 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie (Let's go Brandon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Not sure special police training is required to decide if your life is in danger.


3 posted on 02/26/2022 6:08:17 AM PST by ARW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

He did not kill a man for texting, he killed him because he got attacked by him.

The headline should read “idiot attacks man who complained about texting, gets shot”


4 posted on 02/26/2022 6:09:36 AM PST by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

“...cop who killed man in movie theater for texting...” Once again, a false headline from our enemies in the media.


5 posted on 02/26/2022 6:09:39 AM PST by Hazwaste (Socialists are like slinkies. Only good for pushing down stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

“In his entire career that is the most he has ever been scared? Absolutely unreal,”

**********

Yep gotta watch out for that ‘popcorn’.
It’ll scare you every time.


6 posted on 02/26/2022 6:10:00 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Sounds good. Now what can we do about that guy who talks back to the screen?


7 posted on 02/26/2022 6:12:08 AM PST by sam_whiskey (Peace through Strength. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

The events described in this article bear little resemblance to the actual trial. I watched the trial, I doubt that this reporter saw any of it. I agree with the verdict, but it was a close call for the jury. Clearly, they did not believe the prosecution and I don’t either.


8 posted on 02/26/2022 6:16:16 AM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_whiskey

Get him a parrot. He needs someone to talk to.


9 posted on 02/26/2022 6:16:22 AM PST by DrGunsforHands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Attached by popcorn? I mean really?


10 posted on 02/26/2022 6:16:48 AM PST by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016 democratic )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

There are other witnesses to the event.

He didn’t merely toss popcorn and sit down.


11 posted on 02/26/2022 6:25:22 AM PST by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: conservative98
His lawyers successfully argued that police training informed Reeves’ decision to open fire, as he believed his life was in danger when the victim threw his cellphone at his face and appeared ready to climb over the seat and attack him.

Sounds like a civilian would have been convicted under the same circumstances. A case of police privilege, something I don't care for.

Based upon my limited knowledge of the case, I'd have voted to convict.

12 posted on 02/26/2022 6:25:29 AM PST by Angelino97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98
He wasn't texting. Testimony during trial confirmed he was playing games on his phone. Then he attacked Reeves. The man shot, Oulson, was huge, 6'4" and enraged.

Classic disparity of force.

13 posted on 02/26/2022 6:26:48 AM PST by marktwain (Amazing people can read a persons entire personality and character from one photograph.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Did the wife also attack him? He shot her in the hand. On the surface, it sounds like there was over reacting going on all around.


14 posted on 02/26/2022 6:27:39 AM PST by Savage Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

There are other witnesses to the event.

He didn’t merely toss popcorn and sit down. He threw his cell phone at his face and was climbing over the seat.

What do you think was going to happen next? Should he have waited to find out?


15 posted on 02/26/2022 6:27:52 AM PST by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

In a dark theatre it’s difficult to know what weapons your opponent may be hiding... So it’s always best to shoot first and then ask questions later... Worked out pretty good for this dude.


16 posted on 02/26/2022 6:28:31 AM PST by jerod (Nazi's were essentially Socialist in Hugo Boss uniforms... Get over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARW

While I think his response was unwarranted at the point he shot, I could see escalation being his reasonable fear.

However, his training and experience as a cop should’ve made him more able to anticipate and defuse the situation. His retired cop status should’ve made the jury more doubtful of his actions. In many states, a retired cop still carries arrest powers etc. I think he had options.

In the end, his police elitism earned him an acquittal, in my opinion.


17 posted on 02/26/2022 6:29:58 AM PST by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: conservative98
Is this the end of Corn Pop?


18 posted on 02/26/2022 6:31:23 AM PST by Bobalu (Lord, keep your arm around my shoulder and your hand over my mouth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

So he wasn’t killed for texting he was killed for physically attacking the man.


19 posted on 02/26/2022 6:34:35 AM PST by jughandle (Big words anger me, keep talking. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

“when the victim threw his cellphone at his face and appeared ready to climb over the seat and attack him.”

Right; fake news headline indicates he executed someone for “texting”...


20 posted on 02/26/2022 6:37:00 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson