Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Deaths from COVID-19 with no other underlying causes
UK Office for National Statistics ^ | December 16, 2020 | UK office for national statistics

Posted on 01/22/2022 1:58:13 PM PST by absalom01

You asked ​​Please can you advise on deaths purely from covid with no other underlying causes.

We said Thank you for your request.

We are responsible for the production of mortality data for England and Wales, this is derived from death certificates in the process of death registration.

For mortality figures where COVID-19 was the sole cause of death, please see: Pre-existing conditions of people whose death was recorded with an underlying cause of COVID-19, this dataset can be found in section 8 of the Monthly mortality analysis bulletin. This dataset provides a greater insight into the leading pre-existing cause of death groups, for deaths occurring in England and Wales, in 2020 and the first two quarters of 2021 that were due to COVID-19.

Please see 'table 1a, row 28' (2020) and 'table 1, row 29 (2021)' for deaths where COVID-19 was listed as the underlying cause, but had no other pre-existing conditions recorded on the death certificate, England and Wales. Table 1b represents these figures for England and table 1c figures are for Wales.

This publication will be updated quarterly. COVID-19 deaths involving pre-existing conditions is split by broad age groups between 1-64 and 65+.

Please see below for death registrations for 2020 and 2021 (provisional) that were due to COVID-19 and were recorded without any pre-existing conditions, England and Wales.

2020: 9400 (0-64: 1549 / 65 and over: 7851)

2021 Q1: 6483 (0-64: 1560/ 65 and over: 4923)

2021 Q2: 346 (0-64: 153/ 65 and over: 193)

2021 Q3: 1142 (0-64: 512/ 65 and over: 630)


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Health/Medicine; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: ccpvirus; covid; statistics
Well this is interesting. The UK ONS responded to an information request with the following data, that are, roughtly, a couple orders of magnitude smaller than we might have been lead to believe.

The MSM have of course ignored this, but curious that the alternative media haven't discussed this at all.

What's interesting is that here are some hard statistics that show clearly that the Wuhan flu can certainly be deadly to a subset of the population, but everyone else should worry more about the seasonal flu and RSV than the 'rona.

2020: 9400 (0-64: 1549 / 65 and over: 7851)

2021 Q1: 6483 (0-64: 1560/ 65 and over: 4923)

2021 Q2: 346 (0-64: 153/ 65 and over: 193)

2021 Q3: 1142 (0-64: 512/ 65 and over: 630)

1 posted on 01/22/2022 1:58:13 PM PST by absalom01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: absalom01

2 posted on 01/22/2022 2:03:31 PM PST by Daffynition (*This admin tells us *A* story; but they don't tell us *THE* story* & :) ~ D Bongino)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: absalom01

Starting with the current death toll for the UK (153,787), I did some rough calculations to back out deaths since the 3rd quarter of 2020 and deaths occurring in Scotland (which was apparently not part of the given data). It came out to about 13-15% of the total Covid deaths being due to Covid alone.


3 posted on 01/22/2022 2:14:23 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: absalom01

I wonder if there will ever be an authentic accounting, what with so many people and institutions vested so heavily.


4 posted on 01/22/2022 2:32:55 PM PST by gloryblaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gloryblaze

We need spies in the bureau of statistics, hard copies, digital copies, videos of the head honchos talking about the numbers ( Ala project veritas).Otherwise we will not know in our lifetimes. We must somehow map out a plan for severe punishment for those who gave the greenlight to falsify the information, if indeed, that is the case. Be it governmental, or private. Legally, of course.


5 posted on 01/22/2022 2:43:53 PM PST by Getready (Wisdom is more valuable than gold and diamonds, and harder to find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: absalom01

Counting covid deaths is like counting votes.


6 posted on 01/22/2022 2:44:08 PM PST by Neverlift (When someone says "you just can't make this stuff up" odds are good, somebody did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: absalom01
" The UK ONS responded to an information request "

I have never read of the CDC doing so to a private person. However, from the CDC: As of 12–05-21, for over 5% of reported COVID-19 deaths, that virus was the only cause mentioned on the death certificate, and “for deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 4.0 additional conditions or causes per death.” While this does not necessarily mean the virus was not the leading contributor in the other 94% of the deaths, and it certainly does not mean it was the leading contributor in all the other 94% of these deaths.

More data, by the grace of God.

7 posted on 01/22/2022 3:27:58 PM PST by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save + be baptized + follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: absalom01
-— “The MSM have of course ignored this, but curious that the alternative media haven't discussed this at all.”

From the Drosten RT-PCR test based on Chinese data in January of 2020 — now called “faulty” by the CDC/FDA — to the WHO declaration using altered definitions two months later and their April 2020 directive for how to enhance death certificates to make deaths into Covid deaths, and the massive anomalies in all the “official” reports. the media-driven frenzy has been a fraudulent construction.

Else, as this month ---

Johns Hopkins University's "official" data -- ( 5,547,903 "global deaths" / 7,921,131,915 global population ) x 100 = 0.070% of the global population.

https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/

Worldometer's "official" data -- ( 5,583,850 "global deaths" / 7,921,131,915 global population ) x 100 = 0.070% of the global population.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

8 posted on 01/22/2022 4:07:41 PM PST by Worldtraveler once upon a time
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: absalom01

While data of deaths caused by covid is important to report, I am MUCH more interested in data of deaths caused by being VACCINATED against covid. If a one- or two-page summary of deaths due to the vaccinations was available and routinely updated, I would use such report as defending evidence if my employer - or state - were to mandate my being vaccinated. I don’t know if the VAERS report is sufficiently legitimate and updated, or if there are other, brief summaries available.

The reports I am interested in are simple summaries - including references, in case I want to read them for myself - not pages of plots and raw numbers. I have the option to review the reference and judge if its reporting seems logical. Granted, any summary is likely to include false data - deliberately or not, such as covid patients dead due to having other underlying conditions and reporting deaths solely due to covid. But if the report summarizes data from many different sources, I feel it would be a step in the right direction. I haven’t seen such reports yet.

D&D


9 posted on 01/22/2022 9:36:48 PM PST by Deaf and Discerning
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson